follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2014, 06:14 PM   #15
nunonuna
Senior Member
 
nunonuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: TN
Posts: 569
Thanks: 133
Thanked 174 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiv@Openflash View Post
Nice! Do you know what a stock FRS puts down on that Dyno Dynamics dyno?
I think Dynosty's dyno dynamic read 153.7 whp base fr-s.
nunonuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2014, 01:05 AM   #16
KonTheory
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: '14 FRS
Location: Wetcoast, Canada
Posts: 113
Thanks: 31
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nunonuna View Post
I think Dynosty's dyno dynamic read 153.7 whp base fr-s.
If thats the case I feel much better about 179.7

I was really hoping to crack the 180... but the guys there said it would have been a little higher if it wasnt so hot out..
__________________
'14 Raven FRS - Toyota Badges - Helix Smoked Side Markers - K&N Drop-in - 3" Nameless Axleback 4" Mufflers - Tinted Back Windows - RCE Yellow Springs - Openflash Tablet - OLM HID Kit - Cusco strut bar - TRD Quickshifter - 17x9 Enkei RPF1's with Nitto NT05's
KonTheory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2014, 02:48 AM   #17
nunonuna
Senior Member
 
nunonuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: TN
Posts: 569
Thanks: 133
Thanked 174 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonTheory View Post
If thats the case I feel much better about 179.7

I was really hoping to crack the 180... but the guys there said it would have been a little higher if it wasnt so hot out..
I will also try to dyno mine next Saturday which is gonna be same dyno, but I dont know what number its gonna show because the shop im visiting always shows lower reading than what other people get from other dyno shop with same dyno. will see how mine comes out.
nunonuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2014, 06:08 PM   #18
mid_life_crisis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: FR-S 10 #103 AT
Location: NC
Posts: 1,519
Thanks: 101
Thanked 599 Times in 347 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So I finally started looking at the tables. Can someone who understands tuning explain what has to be done to increase the rev limit? There is obviously a rev limit setting, and you need to add additional lines to other tables. Which tables need to be extended? I found that the ignition tables get altered so the highest rpm is listed as the target, but why is the timing changed to be a negative value? As rpm increase, shouldn't the timing continue to advance, or at least stay stable?
__________________
Necessity may be the mother of Invention but Desperation is quite often the father.
“Sex is like Bridge. If you don't have a good partner, you'd better have a good hand.” - Mae West
Papa said, "son there's a lot of evil temptations out there. Best to try 'em all so you know which ones to avoid."
mid_life_crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2014, 07:26 PM   #19
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mid_life_crisis View Post
So I finally started looking at the tables. Can someone who understands tuning explain what has to be done to increase the rev limit? There is obviously a rev limit setting, and you need to add additional lines to other tables. Which tables need to be extended? I found that the ignition tables get altered so the highest rpm is listed as the target, but why is the timing changed to be a negative value? As rpm increase, shouldn't the timing continue to advance, or at least stay stable?
The timing reduction is part of the soft rev limit as is the reduction in delta from 350 to 50 rpm in the rpm limit/fuel cut tables
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
mid_life_crisis (12-12-2014), RD1428 (01-01-2015)
Old 08-03-2014, 09:25 PM   #20
JB86'd
Senior Member
 
JB86'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: JAWS
Location: socal
Posts: 703
Thanks: 753
Thanked 437 Times in 224 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
@steve99 @Shiv@Openflash reducing the rev limit back to 7500 wouldn't require making any other changes correct? and disabling LC and FFS simply requires setting all associated tables to 0 right?
__________________
JB86'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2014, 10:30 PM   #21
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB86'd View Post
@steve99 @Shiv@Openflash reducing the rev limit back to 7500 wouldn't require making any other changes correct? and disabling LC and FFS simply requires setting all associated tables to 0 right?

for the LC & FFS yes just set the delta=0 for both

The rev limit will require some changes to a couple of tables to get it to work correctly

Base timing B will need the RPM axis changing from 7600 to 7500 and next one from 7450 to 7350

Then the Rev Limit Fuel Cut values from 7600 to 7500 and 7550 to 7450

ie take 100rpm off those 4 values. should do it.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
JB86'd (08-03-2014)
Old 08-03-2014, 10:47 PM   #22
JB86'd
Senior Member
 
JB86'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: JAWS
Location: socal
Posts: 703
Thanks: 753
Thanked 437 Times in 224 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
for the LC & FFS yes just set the delta=0 for both

The rev limit will require some changes to a couple of tables to get it to work correctly

Base timing B will need the RPM axis changing from 7600 to 7500 and next one from 7450 to 7350

Then the Rev Limit Fuel Cut values from 7600 to 7500 and 7550 to 7450

ie take 100rpm off those 4 values. should do it.
Thanks a ton! @Shiv@Openflash can you confirm this is all that's needed to lower the rev limit safely?
__________________
JB86'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2014, 11:18 PM   #23
JB86'd
Senior Member
 
JB86'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: JAWS
Location: socal
Posts: 703
Thanks: 753
Thanked 437 Times in 224 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
for the LC & FFS yes just set the delta=0 for both

The rev limit will require some changes to a couple of tables to get it to work correctly

Base timing B will need the RPM axis changing from 7600 to 7500 and next one from 7450 to 7350

Then the Rev Limit Fuel Cut values from 7600 to 7500 and 7550 to 7450

ie take 100rpm off those 4 values. should do it.
Name:  image.jpg
Views: 1782
Size:  337.2 KB

So it looks like Base Timing A is set at 7400..should I lower it to 7350 or 7300? Lowered Base Timing B to 7500.
__________________
JB86'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2014, 11:22 PM   #24
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB86'd View Post
Attachment 87037

So it looks like Base Timing A is set at 7400..should I lower it to 7350 or 7300? Lowered Base Timing B to 7500.
no need to touch the BASE TIMING A it only used for limp home mode I believe :-)
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 12:21 AM   #25
JB86'd
Senior Member
 
JB86'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: JAWS
Location: socal
Posts: 703
Thanks: 753
Thanked 437 Times in 224 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Name:  image.jpg
Views: 1829
Size:  281.6 KB

Totally misunderstood you @steve99 I think I've got it now! Thanks for your knowledge and help
__________________
JB86'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 12:47 AM   #26
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB86'd View Post
Attachment 87044

Totally misunderstood you @steve99 I think I've got it now! Thanks for your knowledge and help

No worries mate, looks sorted now
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2014, 12:54 PM   #27
mid_life_crisis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: FR-S 10 #103 AT
Location: NC
Posts: 1,519
Thanks: 101
Thanked 599 Times in 347 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiv@Openflash View Post
It can certainly be implemented just by copying the ignition A and ignition B tables (and rev limit values) over from the 6MT map. But to be honest, I don't usually do things like that on Auto cars. Sometimes applying soft rev limits can have an impact on shifting performance when in automatic mode.
I tried implementing the soft rev limit and it works beautifully. I haven't noticed any difference in shifting when the car is left in automatic mode after several days of driving.
__________________
Necessity may be the mother of Invention but Desperation is quite often the father.
“Sex is like Bridge. If you don't have a good partner, you'd better have a good hand.” - Mae West
Papa said, "son there's a lot of evil temptations out there. Best to try 'em all so you know which ones to avoid."
mid_life_crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mid_life_crisis For This Useful Post:
YEAHdams (01-01-2015)
Old 10-23-2014, 02:50 PM   #28
phrosty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Seattle
Posts: 806
Thanks: 202
Thanked 321 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mid_life_crisis View Post
I tried implementing the soft rev limit and it works beautifully. I haven't noticed any difference in shifting when the car is left in automatic mode after several days of driving.
I also use the soft rev limit. I did notice a couple times if I'm up around 7600, it seems to take about twice as long to shift as normal. Our power band peaks before that in NA so not really a big deal, but with FI it might present an issue.
__________________
2013 Whiteout 6AT FR-S | Perrin Inlet Tube + 2.75" CAI | OpenFlash Header | P&L Catback | 4.88 Final Drive | Dialed in OFT 2.0x Stage 2 E85 | 18x8 Enkei Raijin + 225/40 Michelin Pilot Super Sport | 17x7 Stock + 215/45 Michelin X-Ice Xi-2
phrosty is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coilover to Raise Ride Height Furtive Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 48 07-28-2014 01:57 PM
Raise or stay? Bongertz Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 18 07-16-2014 05:12 AM
Raise or stay? Bongertz Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 0 07-03-2014 01:57 AM
Raise Suspension for Winter? Foobar Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 7 10-25-2012 04:20 PM
Raise BRZ djenriquez07 Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 14 08-14-2012 02:28 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.