follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Guides

DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Guides For all DIYs.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2012, 08:51 PM   #15
Indestruct
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2013 SWP Limited BRZ, MT
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 252
Thanks: 52
Thanked 51 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
This is an awesome thread, thank you! I finally hit 1k miles today and was redlining my car... boy is it noisy in the cabin w/this stupid noise generator, serves absolutely no purpose to the car. I will be removing mine.
Indestruct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 04:49 AM   #16
Godzilla35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Nissan GT-R
Location: SoCali
Posts: 436
Thanks: 425
Thanked 84 Times in 58 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I wonder if intake companies will be making two versions: one to keep the noise generator and one without
Godzilla35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 06:46 AM   #17
spiller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: JZA70 Supra, Lancer Evo 5, 86 GTS
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 337
Thanks: 33
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I just dont understand why you would want to remove the noise generator? Im sure toyobaru designed it to keep animals and debris out of there.

Seems like some people want to fuck with their cars just for the sake of it.
spiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 12:30 PM   #18
Keith@AIRAID
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 51 Kaiser, 97 4Runner, 07 Civic Si
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 93
Thanks: 46
Thanked 118 Times in 50 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrimmSpeed View Post
10. Remove the hose routing back to the cabin. Follow the smaller hose from the noise generator to the frame rail below the strut tower. Disconnect the hose from the 90 degree coupler and cap or otherwise cover the open end.


Alternatively, you could remove the rest of the hose and use a 1" hole plug at the firewall.
Keith@AIRAID is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 03:21 PM   #19
FTEIGHTSIX
Switched to the dark side
 
FTEIGHTSIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 91 & 95 240sx KA-T SOLD, 2013 BRZ
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 203
Thanks: 108
Thanked 52 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tritty250 View Post
All hondas have them there, thats where I come from anyways. I would expect the air to be way more turbulent after fighting to get through the filter. But hey, im not an aero engineer so what I say doesnt matter.

Because this car uses a MAF sensor, not a MAP sensor.
Most Hondas use map sensors in their manifold.
MAP sensor VS. MAF sensor

While both sensors accomplish the same thing we could give the +’s of each.
MAP sensor
1. Even if an intake pipe blows off or there is a vacuum hose leak the car will run the same, as the actual manifold pressure will not be any different so you will not be left stranded some where.
2. Sensor reads actual load so there is no guessing what load level the engine is seeing.
MAF sensor
1. The amount of CFM entering the motor is VERY accurate even at low air flow levels. Because of this MAF sensors have a tendency to get better MPG’s (miles per gallon).
2. Most have a built in AIT( Air Intake Temperature ) sensor so you can monitor your actual air intake temps at the sensor.
FTEIGHTSIX is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FTEIGHTSIX For This Useful Post:
steeloyangster (09-05-2012)
Old 06-20-2012, 03:22 PM   #20
Kimsey47
Senior Member
 
Kimsey47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2016 STI DGM
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,875
Thanks: 1,189
Thanked 1,460 Times in 662 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'm surprised this was included just due to the weight savings of not having it on the car... Oh well, don't mind it either way...
__________________
Subaru STI :
Kimsey47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 06:58 PM   #21
waylonrobert
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2006 MZ3
Location: Southern California
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What's the benefit in removing the noise generator? What exactly is it designed to do?
waylonrobert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 12:37 AM   #22
Tritty250
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Whiteout FRS
Location: Illinois
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiller View Post
I just dont understand why you would want to remove the noise generator? Im sure toyobaru designed it to keep animals and debris out of there.

Seems like some people want to fuck with their cars just for the sake of it.
It's a luxury feature for daily driving to keep the cabin (in car) noise down below a certain RPM (i think 4000?). Above 4k I believe it does nothing. So by removing it you can hear more engine noise across all RPM's. It doesnt effect anything but sound levels if you remove it. And what enthusiast doesnt want to hear their engine?
Tritty250 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tritty250 For This Useful Post:
brianhj (08-20-2013)
Old 06-23-2012, 10:40 PM   #23
Kwaziekeller
Senior Member
 
Kwaziekeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '13 Argento MT FR-S
Location: White Hall, AR
Posts: 215
Thanks: 112
Thanked 97 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
My .02 as I've deleted it myself. Pretty simple/straightforward, I removed the hose @ the firewall and capped it there. To cap the intake side I took a different approach, the "cheap" route (I plan to order an intake soon (aFe/Takeda's to be exact). Spray painted a aerosol can cap and taped it to the intake. Sure it's cheap, but so is the DA engineer who thought this made a damn difference... should've raised the NVH a smidge and put a straight through axle-back (reminiscent of the 1st gen SRT4) on instead of some "sound generator tube" lol.... Since the other pics are covered already, I'll show a before and after...





PS I couldn't find my flat black spray paint, so the cap is coated in "Brilliant black crystal pearl"... the color of my old SRT8 lol.
__________________
Kwaziekeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 12:41 AM   #24
Skywgn1
Senior Member
 
Skywgn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S (manual)
Location: Idaho
Posts: 249
Thanks: 83
Thanked 53 Times in 41 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Did you find any hp differences on the dyno?
Skywgn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 07:46 PM   #25
Black Tire
Senior Member
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Whiteout Scion FR-S
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 508
Thanks: 367
Thanked 209 Times in 129 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I will definitely be removing the noise generator. I think it is quite loud in the cabin at high revs for no good purpose. I am also interested in removing the tube that connects through the firewall, as it will be useless once the noise generator is removed.

At least we don't have to deal with an electronic noise generator (through the stereo system!) like the one on the new BMW M5.
__________________
My cars always dress formally. They all wear black tires.

Black Tire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 07:53 PM   #26
Black Tire
Senior Member
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Whiteout Scion FR-S
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 508
Thanks: 367
Thanked 209 Times in 129 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tritty250 View Post
It's a luxury feature for daily driving to keep the cabin (in car) noise down below a certain RPM (i think 4000?). Above 4k I believe it does nothing. So by removing it you can hear more engine noise across all RPM's. It doesnt effect anything but sound levels if you remove it. And what enthusiast doesnt want to hear their engine?
I think this is incorrect. I think the noise generator was put in so that you CAN hear the engine noise. I think the designers (or more likely the marketing people) thought that the noise in the cabin without it did not make the car sound "powerful" or "cool." Deleting the generator should result in less noise at all RPM's, but especially at higher RPM's. Read what GrimmSpeed said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrimmSpeed View Post
Interesting. We did it and measured the dB before and after and found that there was a consistent 3-4dB decrease with the noise generator removed and windows up. That's definitely not an insignificant amount. As far as MAF placement, I suspect that there might be too much turbulence up near the TB for an accurate reading.

- Matt
__________________
My cars always dress formally. They all wear black tires.

Black Tire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Black Tire For This Useful Post:
ill86 (06-29-2012)
Old 06-29-2012, 08:04 PM   #27
FT-86GOD
Senior Rocket Bunny
 
FT-86GOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 1982 XX KE70
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 218 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by waylonrobert View Post
What's the benefit in removing the noise generator? What exactly is it designed to do?
Lol are u serious? The noise generator is designed to..... Generate noise....


I'll be deleting it... It will serve no purpose once I turbo or in the mean time fit a decent intake showing improved output once one is developed.. Wonder if someone will design an OTR intake for the 86/BRZ
FT-86GOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 08:13 PM   #28
ill86
VehicleDynamicsSpecialist
 
ill86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: iG FR-S
Location: illtuned / PittRace
Posts: 750
Thanks: 1,185
Thanked 203 Times in 166 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Tire View Post
I think this is incorrect. I think the noise generator was put in so that you CAN hear the engine noise. I think the designers (or more likely the marketing people) thought that the noise in the cabin without it did not make the car sound "powerful" or "cool.":
You are correct. It is designed so that the driver hears more intake sounds above 4000/4500 rpm. This is the sole purpose.

I know this as I teach motor sports and have done events with Toyota with the FR-S "roll out".. . ie, familiarization for new owners, salesmen, etc.
ill86 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Removing interior trim dash panels ubersoph Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 7 05-30-2012 10:20 AM
Removing the roof antenna denkigrve Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 8 05-17-2012 12:59 AM
Replacing Axle's in my Elantra suprachica79 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 3 10-16-2011 11:25 PM
Strange noise Random_Art Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 15 06-03-2011 04:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.