follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-23-2013, 05:08 PM   #57
gt8613
I dream of BRZ
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Prospective BRZ owner.
Location: Home.
Posts: 548
Thanks: 615
Thanked 84 Times in 66 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl View Post
I wouldn't want to drive my Cayman in the snow any more than I'd want to drive a GT3 or a Ferrari. The ride isn't a whole lot softer either (though I do have a bit more ground clearance, which is nice for speed bumps, curbs, etc). As for luggage? 911s carry a lot more than you might think - the GT3 has a fair amount of room in front, and the spot where the rear seats would be (in any other 911) is pretty large too. I can't comment on the Ferrari though.
There is a video on you ft ube about 911 being the ultimate automobiles for snoe...joy wise. There is s company tgat does that for tourists and such.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk 2
gt8613 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2013, 05:28 PM   #58
chrisl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2006 Cayman S, 2007 Outback 2.5i
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 116
Thanked 455 Times in 303 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gt8613 View Post
There is a video on you ft ube about 911 being the ultimate automobiles for snoe...joy wise. There is s company tgat does that for tourists and such.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk 2
I would bet that the 4wd ones would be a lot of fun in the snow (Carrera 4, 4S, Turbo), but I would think that the RWD 911s (incl. the GT3)/Caymans/Boxsters would be pretty terrifying.
chrisl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2013, 05:48 PM   #59
mike the snake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
That was an uneducated guess. The BRZ has such crappy tires, and handles so well even with them, and it has very good weight distribution, and it's very lightweight, seems to me it's got all the ingredients for supreme handling with better tires.

It would be interesting to see a comparison of the 2 cars with equal tires.



Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl View Post
Why would you think that? I would expect the Cayman's slightly rear-heavy, mid engine layout to be a better overall platform for handling than the front-heavy, front-engine BRZ, even with equal tires.
mike the snake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2013, 12:24 PM   #60
chrisl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2006 Cayman S, 2007 Outback 2.5i
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 116
Thanked 455 Times in 303 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike the snake View Post
That was an uneducated guess. The BRZ has such crappy tires, and handles so well even with them, and it has very good weight distribution, and it's very lightweight, seems to me it's got all the ingredients for supreme handling with better tires.

It would be interesting to see a comparison of the 2 cars with equal tires.
It probably depends in part on what exactly you are looking for in the car - the front-heavy distribution of the BRZ is probably a bit better for drifting, but for high-speed cornering and agility, I would guess that the Cayman's weight distribution would be better. I would also expect that the Cayman's chassis is probably a bit stiffer, and the fact that the Cayman has Porsche's torque vectoring system should also work in its favor. As for weight, the BRZ is 2776, vs the Cayman's 2910 (for the S) or 2888 (for the non-S), so there's not a ton of difference there. It would be an interesting comparison for sure, but I would expect the Cayman to win, even on equal tires.
chrisl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 02:04 PM   #61
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl View Post
It probably depends in part on what exactly you are looking for in the car - the front-heavy distribution of the BRZ is probably a bit better for drifting, but for high-speed cornering and agility, I would guess that the Cayman's weight distribution would be better. I would also expect that the Cayman's chassis is probably a bit stiffer, and the fact that the Cayman has Porsche's torque vectoring system should also work in its favor. As for weight, the BRZ is 2776, vs the Cayman's 2910 (for the S) or 2888 (for the non-S), so there's not a ton of difference there. It would be an interesting comparison for sure, but I would expect the Cayman to win, even on equal tires.
i would imagine that the front biased weight would be better for both drifting and high speed cornering. the agility is where the cayman would probably have an inherent advantage.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 02:41 PM   #62
Suberman
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Subaru BRZ Sport Tech Satin White
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,228
Thanks: 147
Thanked 320 Times in 225 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl View Post
I wouldn't want to drive my Cayman in the snow any more than I'd want to drive a GT3 or a Ferrari. The ride isn't a whole lot softer either (though I do have a bit more ground clearance, which is nice for speed bumps, curbs, etc). As for luggage? 911s carry a lot more than you might think - the GT3 has a fair amount of room in front, and the spot where the rear seats would be (in any other 911) is pretty large too. I can't comment on the Ferrari though.
911 can carry luggage in the back "seat" but the official trunk is tiny, smaller than the BRZ. No golf bag will fit, but you can fit two golf bags in a Cayman.

Porsche promotes winter driving their cars and SUVs up here in Canada, knowing how short our summers are. They put on ice driving sessions for Porsche customers. They promote winter tire/alloy packages at (for Porsche) reasonable prices. Driving a Porsche in winter is commonplace in Europe.

Because they handle so well they drive exceptionally well in winter, especially the 911 with its rear weight bias although a sand bag in the trunk is a good idea. The Cayman needs no sandbag, I winter test drove one and it is truly amazing. I expect my BRZ will be just as good as a good chassis in the dry will be good in the wet, unless it's a BMW.
Suberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 03:02 PM   #63
MY13FRS
***** Super Senior Member
 
MY13FRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 13 FRS
Location: Pluto
Posts: 177
Thanks: 12
Thanked 72 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwjcyber View Post
Watch YouTube videos of ft86 vs rx-8. RX-8 isn't even close.


Had all three and the video review is dead on. The dynamics of the FRS/BRZ is nothing new. Perhaps for the late comers (whom have never owned any Japanese sporty cars before), then this car seems to have it all.

But the fact is, it's really a copy of older Jap cars, except it's deemed more "affordable").

That is all.
MY13FRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 11:38 PM   #64
chrisl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2006 Cayman S, 2007 Outback 2.5i
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 116
Thanked 455 Times in 303 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suberman View Post
The Cayman needs no sandbag, I winter test drove one and it is truly amazing. I expect my BRZ will be just as good as a good chassis in the dry will be good in the wet, unless it's a BMW.
Really? I'll have to try that sometime then - I just assumed that (as a powerful, rear-drive sportscar) the Cayman would be terrible in the snow.
chrisl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2013, 12:45 AM   #65
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MY13FRS View Post
Had all three and the video review is dead on. The dynamics of the FRS/BRZ is nothing new. Perhaps for the late comers (whom have never owned any Japanese sporty cars before), then this car seems to have it all.

But the fact is, it's really a copy of older Jap cars, except it's deemed more "affordable").

That is all.
I would disagree. The dynamic of the FR-S/BRZ is far different from the S2k and RX-8.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2013, 01:46 AM   #66
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mazda MX-5 [end thread]
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2013, 02:56 AM   #67
chrisl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2006 Cayman S, 2007 Outback 2.5i
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 116
Thanked 455 Times in 303 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by solidONE View Post
Mazda MX-5 [end thread]
Not sure if serious....
chrisl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2013, 03:29 AM   #68
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl View Post
Not sure if serious....
im pretty sure hes serious. either handling is looked at as subjective and then its pretty hard to beat the little miata for some magical reason or its objective and the answer should probably end up being a vette or viper of some sort
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fatoni For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (08-26-2013)
Old 08-26-2013, 03:39 AM   #69
solidONE
Senior Member
 
solidONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl View Post
Not sure if serious....
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
im pretty sure hes serious. either handling is looked at as subjective and then its pretty hard to beat the little miata for some magical reason or its objective and the answer should probably end up being a vette or viper of some sort
I was serious, then I though of a couple other cars that handles even better.

Lotus Exige and Ariel Atom.

Except for the above 2, handicap any high dollar car you can think of to the same power to weight ratio and tires as the MX-5 and it will kick their asses around any twisty track or road and hand it back to them.
solidONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2013, 06:31 AM   #70
Sport-Tech
Senior Member
 
Sport-Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k View Post
The new Corvette is getting rave reviews. And this time those reviews are raving not just about the car's performance, but also about how easy it is to drive the car and how connected to the road the driver feels. We finally have a Corvette that is the complete package and can compete with Porsche in not just performance but also driving feel, driver position and interior refinement.
Agreed, and let me add something to that. A member of Corvetteforum lives near Laguna Seca and has contacts at GM, so was able to be there last week when Motor Trend brought a C7 w/Z51 and mag ride shocks (about $57k) to do battle with a 991 C2S ($100k+). As per their normal practice, Randy Pobst was there to give a pro perspective. The poster had to agree to some non-disclosure to preserve his future access, but he made it pretty clear that the C7 gave the Porsche a bit of a beatdown, and not just on the objective tests. Can't wait till that comparison gets published.

I can see some of my liquid assets getting a little less liquid soon....
Sport-Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sport-Tech For This Useful Post:
WolfpackS2k (08-26-2013)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how much drop without hurting handling? nonicname Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 1 11-19-2012 09:23 PM
Few complaints about the handling need solutions regal Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 18 10-01-2012 07:21 PM
Delivery processing and handling fee Gamboa1047 Southern California 6 08-26-2012 11:34 AM
A Testimony To The FR-S's Handling skoodge Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 25 06-08-2012 07:36 AM
AE86 handling video... Blokatos FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 9 02-07-2010 05:20 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.