|
||||||
| Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] For all off-topic discussion topics. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FR-S (M/T)
Location: GTA
Posts: 1,205
Thanks: 492
Thanked 392 Times in 238 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
New F1 regulations: significant redesign of vehicles
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/25158104
TLDR; F1 is benching NA V8's and getting V6 Turbos, some re-design of aerobody, new KERS/ERS system "The V8 engines produced about 780bhp. The new turbo engines will on their own produce in the region of 620bhp or more, but the electrical energy will increase that back up to at least the same as before. Some insiders have even said total power could be as high as 840bhp at the start of 2014." "One electric motor works like the current Kers. When a driver brakes, a motor-generator captures energy and converts it to electrical power, which is stored in a battery. This can then be re-applied during acceleration to boost performance. The second electrical motor is attached to the turbo. Normally a turbo has something called a waste-gate on the exhaust side, which releases excess energy if the pressure gets too high. Instead of a waste-gate, the motor will convert that excess energy into electricity by preventing the turbo from over-speeding. This electrical energy can then be used immediately or to help charge the battery pack. This second motor is new technology and it is an area that has been left open for F1 to innovate. Because the turbo can be maintained at the required operating revs, its power delivery should be instant."
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to 1Cor10:23 For This Useful Post: | ATL BRZ (12-03-2013) |
|
|
#2 |
|
i'm sorry, what?
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,508 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
meh
i say make it no rules i want to see cars shatter into bits and pieces from cornering force overload and cars reachign 600mph on the straights bring it on!
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to 7thgear For This Useful Post: | wparsons (12-07-2013) |
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 GBS BRZ (AT)
Location: E PA / NYC / LI
Posts: 162
Thanks: 67
Thanked 38 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Freaking crazy
I say lift the military restrictions on the Japanese. Outcome: Initial D + Gundam |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FR-S (M/T)
Location: GTA
Posts: 1,205
Thanks: 492
Thanked 392 Times in 238 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
TEQSPORT Brand Manager
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '24 GR86 + '16 FR-S
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 3,725
Thanked 4,137 Times in 1,707 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
Good read, thanks.
Looking forward to next season! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 04' Saab 9-5 Aero
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 602
Thanks: 7
Thanked 199 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
![]() In regards to F1, yeah no restrictions........these things are supposed to be the height of automotive technology yet we try to limit them more and more *thinks back to the 1000hp V10 or the lunatic manual gear changing 1400hp twin turbo I4 monsters of the Senna era. I want cars that go 400mph, are powered by octa-turbo'd scram jets going up vertical corkscrew around skyscrapers, with their "pilots" nationally celebrated as hero's for not getting killed every other race
__________________
_____________________
You know what they say... pick two: cheap, fast, reliable. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Joakim3 For This Useful Post: | SirBrass (12-07-2013) |
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Ultramarine toyobaru
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 605
Thanks: 311
Thanked 576 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
FIA needs to stop with all the technical regulations and simply give teams a budget cap. XX million a year maximum for everyone and then forgo all these silly rules about aero and tires.
They are discussing 2 obligatory pit stops as well. FIA doesnt understand that no one wants to see tire strategy and pit stops, they want to see the fastest cars being driven as fast as possible by the fastest drivers. A budget cap along with more design freedom would be a better test automotive design and would make the constructors championship actually mean something. As far as I am concerned there are only 3 basic rules which should be needed in F1 regulations. Engine displacement, chassis dimensions (wheelbase, height, width), and safety regulation (crash test standards etc). Give them a max displacement and let the teams do what they want with it. supercharged V8, turbo V6, or even 4 cyl. I could rant about this all day long, bit of an F1 nut. Unfortunately I'm slowly losing hope in my favorite autosport. |
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to headlikeahole For This Useful Post: | SirBrass (12-07-2013), Slartibartfast (01-13-2014) |
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I agree completely!
F1 is becoming a spec class. The new rules suck. Kers aided V-6's? What BS! I bet if you asked everyone except the governing bodies (teams, manufacturers, drivers, fans) what they wanted, they would say to bring back the high revving, 1000+HP v-10's and v-12's, let the companies build what they think are the fastest cars, don't restrict anything except the basics, and let the drivers hash it out on the track. I want to have faith, I LIVE for F1, but kers aided turbo V-6's is just wrong IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member of the year - 2016
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: New York
Posts: 3,575
Thanks: 788
Thanked 2,427 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I support these, can't wait to see KERS on road cars.
__________________
Friends don't let friends Plastidip
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
The KERS aided thing is actually pretty neat, it's an electric turbo-compound which lets you make moar power.
While F1 is called *Formula for a reason, I think it's stupid how teams blow hundreds of millions on tweaking the tiny things within the tight restrictions when if you just made it who can build the fastest car with say a fuel or budget or something restriction, then you'd get better cars and less money spent to get there. If there were no engine regulations then money would go towards you know, actual design, instead of figuring out how to tweak some exotic materials to meet the regulations. Maybe a fixed aero rule because I dislike the whole giant wing with DRS thing. Let them do whatever they want for bodywork and powertrain, within safety regulations, maybe require a minimum weight, use the best tires, and I think it'd end up a lot more interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 04' Saab 9-5 Aero
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 602
Thanks: 7
Thanked 199 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Essentially what everyone else is saying
The only rules that should be applied is - Minimum weight - Safety standards - Universal Tire - Budget cap - Driver Electronic/Aids
__________________
_____________________
You know what they say... pick two: cheap, fast, reliable. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Joakim3 For This Useful Post: | SirBrass (12-04-2013) |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Ultramarine toyobaru
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 605
Thanks: 311
Thanked 576 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Getting rid of traction control is probably the only good regulation change they have made in over 20 years. Its like theyre not even listening to the fans. Pathetic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Ultramarine toyobaru
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 605
Thanks: 311
Thanked 576 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Add driver/electronic aids to that and you have yourself a list as far as I am concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 04' Saab 9-5 Aero
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 602
Thanks: 7
Thanked 199 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Definitely, whats the point of F1 if not to go all out? If they want their cars to run on depleted uranium let them, if they want 70 spoilers let them, if they want to put Venturi Tunnels & mirco-turbines fans that suck the tarmac off the road why the hell not........ and let the best driver win I (and probably 99% of the F1 fan base) want fucking Brazzers not, The L Word
__________________
_____________________
You know what they say... pick two: cheap, fast, reliable. Last edited by Joakim3; 12-12-2013 at 12:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Joakim3 For This Useful Post: | Slartibartfast (01-13-2014) |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Brakes from other vehicles? | BRAWL | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 15 | 06-24-2013 03:41 PM |
| post pic of wife/girlfriend/significant other | draggin_az | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 75 | 12-12-2012 10:00 PM |
| BRZ Demo vehicles for sale | Redline_Randy | AUSTRALIA | 12 | 10-29-2012 10:28 AM |
| 2012 ARC Regulations | coyote | AUSTRALIA | 4 | 12-05-2011 02:48 AM |
| Toyota FT-86 redesign rumors UNTRUE! Production version rumored to be shown at Geneva | BlackArtsViper | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 113 | 06-20-2010 06:42 PM |