follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS]

Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] For all off-topic discussion topics.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2013, 10:56 AM   #1
1Cor10:23
Senior Member
 
1Cor10:23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FR-S (M/T)
Location: GTA
Posts: 1,205
Thanks: 492
Thanked 392 Times in 238 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
New F1 regulations: significant redesign of vehicles

http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/25158104

TLDR; F1 is benching NA V8's and getting V6 Turbos, some re-design of aerobody, new KERS/ERS system

"The V8 engines produced about 780bhp. The new turbo engines will on their own produce in the region of 620bhp or more, but the electrical energy will increase that back up to at least the same as before. Some insiders have even said total power could be as high as 840bhp at the start of 2014."

"One electric motor works like the current Kers. When a driver brakes, a motor-generator captures energy and converts it to electrical power, which is stored in a battery. This can then be re-applied during acceleration to boost performance.

The second electrical motor is attached to the turbo.
Normally a turbo has something called a waste-gate on the exhaust side, which releases excess energy if the pressure gets too high.
Instead of a waste-gate, the motor will convert that excess energy into electricity by preventing the turbo from over-speeding. This electrical energy can then be used immediately or to help charge the battery pack.
This second motor is new technology and it is an area that has been left open for F1 to innovate.

Because the turbo can be maintained at the required operating revs, its power delivery should be instant."
1Cor10:23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 1Cor10:23 For This Useful Post:
ATL BRZ (12-03-2013)
Old 12-03-2013, 10:58 AM   #2
7thgear
i'm sorry, what?
 
7thgear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,508 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
meh

i say make it no rules

i want to see cars shatter into bits and pieces from cornering force overload and cars reachign 600mph on the straights

bring it on!
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
7thgear is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 7thgear For This Useful Post:
wparsons (12-07-2013)
Old 12-03-2013, 11:00 AM   #3
Pokeguyjai
Senior Member
 
Pokeguyjai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 GBS BRZ (AT)
Location: E PA / NYC / LI
Posts: 162
Thanks: 67
Thanked 38 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Freaking crazy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7thgear View Post
meh

i say make it no rules

i want to see cars shatter into bits and pieces from cornering force overload and cars reachign 600mph on the straights

bring it on!
I say lift the military restrictions on the Japanese. Outcome: Initial D + Gundam
__________________
Pokeguyjai is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Pokeguyjai For This Useful Post:
Ben_G (12-03-2013), Luis_GT (12-07-2013), SirBrass (12-07-2013)
Old 12-03-2013, 11:02 AM   #4
1Cor10:23
Senior Member
 
1Cor10:23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FR-S (M/T)
Location: GTA
Posts: 1,205
Thanks: 492
Thanked 392 Times in 238 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokeguyjai View Post
Outcome: Initial D + Gundam
LOL
1Cor10:23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 11:06 AM   #5
ATL BRZ
TEQSPORT Brand Manager
 
ATL BRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '24 GR86 + '16 FR-S
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 3,725
Thanked 4,137 Times in 1,707 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
Good read, thanks.

Looking forward to next season!
ATL BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 09:27 PM   #6
Joakim3
Senior Member
 
Joakim3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 04' Saab 9-5 Aero
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 602
Thanks: 7
Thanked 199 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokeguyjai View Post
Freaking crazy

I say lift the military restrictions on the Japanese. Outcome: Initial D + Gundam
Second this

In regards to F1, yeah no restrictions........these things are supposed to be the height of automotive technology yet we try to limit them more and more *thinks back to the 1000hp V10 or the lunatic manual gear changing 1400hp twin turbo I4 monsters of the Senna era.

I want cars that go 400mph, are powered by octa-turbo'd scram jets going up vertical corkscrew around skyscrapers, with their "pilots" nationally celebrated as hero's for not getting killed every other race
__________________
_____________________

You know what they say... pick two: cheap, fast, reliable.
Joakim3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joakim3 For This Useful Post:
SirBrass (12-07-2013)
Old 12-03-2013, 10:01 PM   #7
headlikeahole
Senior Member
 
headlikeahole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Ultramarine toyobaru
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 605
Thanks: 311
Thanked 576 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
FIA needs to stop with all the technical regulations and simply give teams a budget cap. XX million a year maximum for everyone and then forgo all these silly rules about aero and tires.

They are discussing 2 obligatory pit stops as well. FIA doesnt understand that no one wants to see tire strategy and pit stops, they want to see the fastest cars being driven as fast as possible by the fastest drivers. A budget cap along with more design freedom would be a better test automotive design and would make the constructors championship actually mean something.

As far as I am concerned there are only 3 basic rules which should be needed in F1 regulations. Engine displacement, chassis dimensions (wheelbase, height, width), and safety regulation (crash test standards etc). Give them a max displacement and let the teams do what they want with it. supercharged V8, turbo V6, or even 4 cyl.

I could rant about this all day long, bit of an F1 nut. Unfortunately I'm slowly losing hope in my favorite autosport.
headlikeahole is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to headlikeahole For This Useful Post:
SirBrass (12-07-2013), Slartibartfast (01-13-2014)
Old 12-04-2013, 12:00 AM   #8
mike the snake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I agree completely!

F1 is becoming a spec class. The new rules suck. Kers aided V-6's? What BS!

I bet if you asked everyone except the governing bodies (teams, manufacturers, drivers, fans) what they wanted, they would say to bring back the high revving, 1000+HP v-10's and v-12's, let the companies build what they think are the fastest cars, don't restrict anything except the basics, and let the drivers hash it out on the track.

I want to have faith, I LIVE for F1, but kers aided turbo V-6's is just wrong IMO.
mike the snake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 12:12 AM   #9
dem00n
Member of the year - 2016
 
dem00n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: New York
Posts: 3,575
Thanks: 788
Thanked 2,427 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I support these, can't wait to see KERS on road cars.
__________________
Friends don't let friends Plastidip
dem00n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 12:14 AM   #10
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
The KERS aided thing is actually pretty neat, it's an electric turbo-compound which lets you make moar power.

While F1 is called *Formula for a reason, I think it's stupid how teams blow hundreds of millions on tweaking the tiny things within the tight restrictions when if you just made it who can build the fastest car with say a fuel or budget or something restriction, then you'd get better cars and less money spent to get there. If there were no engine regulations then money would go towards you know, actual design, instead of figuring out how to tweak some exotic materials to meet the regulations. Maybe a fixed aero rule because I dislike the whole giant wing with DRS thing. Let them do whatever they want for bodywork and powertrain, within safety regulations, maybe require a minimum weight, use the best tires, and I think it'd end up a lot more interesting.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 12:29 AM   #11
Joakim3
Senior Member
 
Joakim3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 04' Saab 9-5 Aero
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 602
Thanks: 7
Thanked 199 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Essentially what everyone else is saying

The only rules that should be applied is
- Minimum weight
- Safety standards
- Universal Tire
- Budget cap
- Driver Electronic/Aids
__________________
_____________________

You know what they say... pick two: cheap, fast, reliable.
Joakim3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joakim3 For This Useful Post:
SirBrass (12-04-2013)
Old 12-04-2013, 12:29 AM   #12
headlikeahole
Senior Member
 
headlikeahole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Ultramarine toyobaru
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 605
Thanks: 311
Thanked 576 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
The KERS aided thing is actually pretty neat, it's an electric turbo-compound which lets you make moar power.

While F1 is called *Formula for a reason, I think it's stupid how teams blow hundreds of millions on tweaking the tiny things within the tight restrictions when if you just made it who can build the fastest car with say a fuel or budget or something restriction, then you'd get better cars and less money spent to get there. If there were no engine regulations then money would go towards you know, actual design, instead of figuring out how to tweak some exotic materials to meet the regulations. Maybe a fixed aero rule because I dislike the whole giant wing with DRS thing. Let them do whatever they want for bodywork and powertrain, within safety regulations, maybe require a minimum weight, use the best tires, and I think it'd end up a lot more interesting.
Exactly! The only thing I would add as far as regulations go, is no driver aid/traction control/electronic suspension. No one wants to see a car that practically drives itself.

Getting rid of traction control is probably the only good regulation change they have made in over 20 years. Its like theyre not even listening to the fans. Pathetic.
headlikeahole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 12:30 AM   #13
headlikeahole
Senior Member
 
headlikeahole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Ultramarine toyobaru
Location: NS Canada
Posts: 605
Thanks: 311
Thanked 576 Times in 221 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joakim3 View Post
Essentially what everyone else is saying

The only rules that should be applied is
- Minimum weight
- Safety standards
- Universal Tire
- Budget cap

Other than that..... let the teams go utterly bonkers, I want to see fucking Hot Wheels
Add driver/electronic aids to that and you have yourself a list as far as I am concerned.
headlikeahole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2013, 12:37 AM   #14
Joakim3
Senior Member
 
Joakim3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 04' Saab 9-5 Aero
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 602
Thanks: 7
Thanked 199 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by headlikeahole View Post
Add driver/electronic aids to that and you have yourself a list as far as I am concerned.
Added lol

Definitely, whats the point of F1 if not to go all out? If they want their cars to run on depleted uranium let them, if they want 70 spoilers let them, if they want to put Venturi Tunnels & mirco-turbines fans that suck the tarmac off the road why the hell not........ and let the best driver win

I (and probably 99% of the F1 fan base) want fucking Brazzers not, The L Word
__________________
_____________________

You know what they say... pick two: cheap, fast, reliable.

Last edited by Joakim3; 12-12-2013 at 12:50 AM.
Joakim3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joakim3 For This Useful Post:
Slartibartfast (01-13-2014)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brakes from other vehicles? BRAWL Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 15 06-24-2013 03:41 PM
post pic of wife/girlfriend/significant other draggin_az Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 75 12-12-2012 10:00 PM
BRZ Demo vehicles for sale Redline_Randy AUSTRALIA 12 10-29-2012 10:28 AM
2012 ARC Regulations coyote AUSTRALIA 4 12-05-2011 02:48 AM
Toyota FT-86 redesign rumors UNTRUE! Production version rumored to be shown at Geneva BlackArtsViper Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 113 06-20-2010 06:42 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.