|
Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-22-2017, 04:38 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
FLKC in high gears (e.g track). What is acceptable?
For many perhaps not that relevant (unless you are not worried about your license) or for those tracking their cars:
What FLKC should we accept at 4th/5th gear at high rpm? I'm not sure I can live with this. And I really don't want to pull 2 deg timing out of Base Timing B either. I suppose there is no solution except going Ecutek?
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tor For This Useful Post: | Vin (07-23-2017) |
07-22-2017, 05:47 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Adjust cams/add fuel/add DI/add EcuTek.....
Or a combination of the above. What's your FLKC regard value set to?
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
07-22-2017, 07:12 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
It's running 20.3 port from 2k to redline. Above 6k exhaust is at fixed 25 retard and intake advance is 28, 21, 13, 10, 5, 3. This is more zoomed in and filtered for AFR above 13: I suppose "per gear timing" is the only solution if I don't want to sacrifice performance in lower gears? Or should I just live with it and leave it to the ECU to retard the timing? Timing Compensation per cylinder A and B is zeroed out. I'll try to restore that to stock and see if it makes a difference. In lower gears my experience is that TCPC doesn't make a difference at all. The fuel used it 102 octane and the IAT was 29 deg. I have 100% IAT comp activation at 6 and 7k (the definitions I have the value is positive for retard) and the retard value in Timing Compensation IAT is -1.05. I checked the tables and the values add up to the log.
__________________
Last edited by Tor; 07-22-2017 at 07:23 PM. |
|
07-26-2017, 09:32 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The FLKC graph illustrates perfectly where you are hitting the wall of the capabilities of your header.
You can't ask it to do what it's not designed for. Bite the bullet, take the timing out and spend the money on track time where it belongs.
__________________
Last edited by Wayno; 07-26-2017 at 09:57 AM. |
07-26-2017, 09:40 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2014 BRZ Limited SWP 6MT
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 106
Thanks: 30
Thanked 68 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Last edited by tdotBRZ; 07-26-2017 at 09:42 AM. Reason: additional info |
|
07-26-2017, 10:44 AM | #6 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Also as far as I recall I didn't get nearly as bad FLKC when it was colder (this log had 30 deg C IAT). I might make IAT compensation (even) more aggressive before I'll lose the timing. And as said above I'll put the TCPC back in first and see if it makes a difference. This is how it ran on track with the same timing at 15 deg C IAT (actually more timing due to higher load and no IAT comp - knock corr is FLKC, and the data are Tactrix log overlaid): Quote:
P.s. Are you criticizing my tune? Auch, that hurt! It's the 33rd iteration. It's the set to target 11.6 AFR on purpose:
__________________
|
||
07-26-2017, 10:48 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2014 BRZ Limited SWP 6MT
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 106
Thanks: 30
Thanked 68 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
07-26-2017, 11:20 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Hmmm
The knock sensors are basically microphones designed to detect certain frequency's which the ecu then processes through some algorithms. After processing this produces either flkc or fbkc signals which is the ecu's reaction to the inputs from the knock sensors. If the ECU detects enough knock signal in certain time periods of large enough magnitude (ie you will initially see it as fbkc or flkc) then it will decrement the IAM value. The flkc is likely real and even if it was false the ecu would react to it the same as it doesn't know the difference its just an input signal from knock sensor. IAM does not reduce instantly on knock its a derived value set by ECU dependant on its perception of the severity of the knock. Their no separate sensor for IAM flkc fbkc its all derived from same sensors. I don't think anyone has complete understanding of all the processing and algorithms used but theirs some good info over at the Romraider site. But it was based on wrx ecu but likely similar, but best we have to work with. http://www.romraider.com/forum/topic1840.html I don't think header or aftermarket exhaust noise is going to cause false knock indication , unless its actually hitting on chassis or similar. Why because if you run good E85 fuel you will get virtually no knock even with 4 degrees or more timing than that. To test if its real knock pull a couple of degrees out of the map or run higher octane fuel (unlikely you can find better than 102 ron easily). If the knock persists at same levels it likely false if it reduces significantly it was likely real. Its highly unlikely you will "hear" knock on these cars especially it higher rpm. Occasionally ive heard knock on stock cars , stock tune around 2 or 3 k rpm but they have quiet exhausts and they knock bad on stock tune in that area (on our crap fuel anyway) |
07-26-2017, 11:39 AM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Probably have to run a "track" tune with less timing than your "road" tune or run some higher octane fuel on track day ?? Now you could do that with wayno's flex fuel tune, just disable all the flex fueling adjustments. Put a toggle switch to earth into the evap input on ECU. Then you can just toggle between two timing and AFR maps with the toggle switch. Put track values in one set ie bit lower timing and maybe bit richer afr and road setting in other more timing leaner afr. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | Tor (07-26-2017) |
07-26-2017, 01:18 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: FR-S
Location: Sask., Canada
Posts: 250
Thanks: 84
Thanked 89 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Do you log oil temperatures? I also have built a tune for a cat less header (Ace 350) with the rest of the exhaust and intake being stock. I see similar knock to yours, where there is no knock for all sorts of street and autocross driving, but on track I get significant FLKC without an IAM drop. This only happens for me when oil temperature rises above ~ 240 F. I suspect cylinder head temperatures have risen to the point that knock becomes frequent.
The solution is probably a street map and a track map, or perhaps some sort of ROM hack where we replace coolant temperature timing compensation with oil temperature timing compensation. Not sure how well that would work with an oil cooler though. |
07-26-2017, 01:26 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: '13 Argento FR-S (Sold)
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 3,209
Thanked 1,439 Times in 855 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
sub'd
__________________
|
07-26-2017, 02:33 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If you have built an engine, like changed internals, then it may be more noisy due to extra slack in the components. These are likely to be in the frequency range that the stock sensor and ECU filtering work and therefore it is possible to trigger the timing retard. Changes in general noise in the engine bay, like a change in exhaust manifold, will make no difference. It's simply not the right frequency and is not going to have an impact on the knock sensor output. It's a shame that we can't adjust the OEM knock filtering, however unless you change to noisier internals then the OEM calibration is not an issue. Also, if it was the exhaust causing the right frequency to trigger it then it would do it all the time in every gear
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | Tor (07-26-2017) |
07-27-2017, 12:55 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I've the same issues mentioned including the 'phantom' knock not alleviated by dialing back base timing and increased KC in higher gears tuning with the OFT/Romraider.
Carry on discussion gentlemen.
__________________
Intent > Content
cowardice is the mother of cruelty. |
07-27-2017, 02:25 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
You spend a lot more time above 6800 in 5th than 3rd don't you ? Something like 12s compared to 2s ? Your cattemp shows 600 in 3rd and 660 is 5th. What happens to the volume of gas as you increase the temperature? Maybe look at more of your data channels? A stock header (with hollowed out cat or not) is not designed to flow well above 7k, as intended by the factory engineers. Any turbulence may also increase back-pressure. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High performance Vortech at track | Sonolin | Forced Induction | 41 | 03-18-2016 07:19 PM |
High negative FLKC values on the highway | RIP.S2000 | Software Tuning | 4 | 12-18-2015 10:36 PM |
Anybody change rear gears or trans gears yet? | ramosryan | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 2 | 06-13-2014 12:48 AM |
Acceptable helmet suggestions. | jadewbj | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 40 | 10-03-2012 03:59 PM |
High Plains Raceway track day | Rejor11 | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 4 | 08-21-2012 09:02 AM |