follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2013, 12:28 AM   #29
Shankenstein
Frosty Carrot
 
Shankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 431 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkullWorks View Post
interesting, a couple of notes

1.) I didn't see paper or cellulose in there.

2.) Their list of metal (quoted) seems like BS, they have aluminum alloy as one simple line...I have a problem with that , there are dozens if not hundreds of grades of Aluminum, and all are alloys...Pure aluminum is nearly useless for most applications.

3.) They state 6061 and it's oxide layer are suitable for E-85? yet Aluminum must be plated before use in gas stations? 6061 is the most readily available and widely used alloy of Aluminum that I can think of only Al 356 comes close (casting alloy)

4.) Did they maintain the concentration of ethanol somehow, was it constantly replenished? Ethanol (or most alcohols) are hygroscopic, they will absorb their own weight in Water given enough exposure to the humidity in the air. and Ethanol at 110f doesn't hand around very long, the rate of evaporation is pretty substantial in that condition

5.) it is common knowledge (in some circles) that you must anodize Al fuel lines for use in a E-85 application due to the increased risc of corrosion due to the water holding abilities of E-85


What say yee?
1) Don't think paper was in the scope of their test.

2) McMaster has 17 types. They even state that 6061 is the most common for automotive components.

3) Just above that, I mention a Dept of Energy publication that recommends nickel plating aluminum. Certain advanced alloys are likely to be OK, but unless you know the content... there's alot of variance in "aluminum" so plating is a smart idea.

4) If I were a betting man, I'd say they put a bunch of large beakers in a sealed oven (separated from the heating element of course). Set 1 sample in each beaker, hang the other above it. Let it sit for a month, checking occasionally for issues. Weigh the samples pre- and post-test on a digital gram scale. Closed environment means humidity control.

5) E85 responds very differently since it is anhydrous ethanol + gasoline. It gets all of the water separated out before blending. Once it's blended, it's fairly stable... but you're right it can absorb water from the air. E100 (in Brazil and other places) is hydrous ethanol that has 1% water and 99% ethanol. That kind of fuel has it's own can of worms... but it is a simpler fuel to design around (if you happen to have acres of sugar cane lying around).

Thanks for the discussion. Always good to find people with some brains and experience BOTH.

On a lighter note... anybody have a guess what the adhesive is? wood glue? epoxy? Elmer's? Place your bets!
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX
Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club
Shankenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Shankenstein For This Useful Post:
robispec (05-30-2013), s2d4 (05-30-2013), SkullWorks (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 12:34 AM   #30
Adeets
OEDC
 
Adeets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Vortech 8.5psi 274WHP 2013 BRZ
Location: Pa
Posts: 619
Thanks: 117
Thanked 263 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankenstein View Post

On a lighter note... anybody have a guess what the adhesive is? wood glue? epoxy? Elmer's? Place your bets!
I'm gonna guess some type of hoof.
__________________
My BRZ FI Build
Visconti is like a Tick that sucks as much blood(money) as he can before you figure out he's there.
please make sure to leave your experiences with visconti on his feedback thread located here: Visconti feedback
Adeets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 01:03 AM   #31
SkullWorks
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SSM LT MT BRZ
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,033
Thanks: 803
Thanked 754 Times in 328 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankenstein View Post
3) Just above that, I mention a Dept of Energy publication that recommends nickel plating aluminum. Certain advanced alloys are likely to be OK, but unless you know the content... there's alot of variance in "aluminum" so plating is a smart idea.
No kidding I got some Cold Finished 6061 from Fry Steel recently that cut alot more like copper than Aluminum...Certed by an American lab CoO was Korea


Quote:
4) If I were a betting man, I'd say they put a bunch of large beakers in a sealed oven (separated from the heating element of course). Set 1 sample in each beaker, hang the other above it. Let it sit for a month, checking occasionally for issues. Weigh the samples pre- and post-test on a digital gram scale. Closed environment means humidity control.
Thank you that makes sense, I am really just a hillbilly...i was thinking oak barrels coat hanger and the swamp lol


Quote:
5) E85 responds very differently since it is anhydrous ethanol + gasoline. It gets all of the water separated out before blending. Once it's blended, it's fairly stable... but you're right it can absorb water from the air. E100 (in Brazil and other places) is hydrous ethanol that has 1% water and 99% ethanol. That kind of fuel has it's own can of worms... but it is a simpler fuel to design around (if you happen to have acres of sugar cane lying around).

This is interesting I was not aware that there was a positive (for this application) effect on water absorption by blending the Ethanol and Gasoline.

I had heard alot of boat owners complaining of the E10 blends not storing well due to the large vents on boats and the tendency to absorb water. Was this a scape goat for another source of water contamination possibly?

And Thanks, :happy0180:
SkullWorks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SkullWorks For This Useful Post:
Shankenstein (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 07:44 AM   #32
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opposed View Post
Help me to understand how the amount of time the car has been "tracked" has anything to do with it. We aren't talking about tires or brake pads. Are you referring to the amount of fuel going through it at a given time? How does that really effect it? Im actually curious...

It's a positive displacement pump with no means of regulating flow. It puts out the same flow if your at idle in traffic or bombing down the front straight of your favorite track. There is a pressure regulator after the pump that unloads fuel back to the tank to maintain pressure in the system, but that doesn't effect the flow rate within the pump and thus the inlet filter. The fact that most of Robi's driving has been at a great rate of speed means that his pump has been running a lot less then someone who has driven the same amount of miles but in city traffic. I'd really like to see how many hours his car has ran, but most people don't log that.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post:
Opposed (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 09:09 AM   #33
markitect
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: Michigan
Posts: 216
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankenstein View Post
Nylon 6 6
Nylon 12 is the preferred material for flex fuel cars. Nylon 6 12 is good too, but more expensive.
markitect is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to markitect For This Useful Post:
Shankenstein (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 09:15 AM   #34
xjohnx
Grip>Slip
 
xjohnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 13 SWP BRZ Ltd - Innovate Powered!
Location: RVA
Posts: 3,563
Thanks: 656
Thanked 1,717 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Not sure how helpful or relavent this may be, but this post has quite a bit of good info on the BRZ fuel system:

http://www.iwsti.com/forums/built-mo...lkthrough.html
xjohnx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xjohnx For This Useful Post:
mad_sb (05-30-2013), Shankenstein (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 09:15 AM   #35
reeves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: BRZ
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 1,021
Thanks: 289
Thanked 397 Times in 265 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw20kosh View Post
The filter:
....
5. The enclosure with the filter in it costs ~$145.00. Part #: 42052D is referred to as "Bracket Complete Pump"
For that price I might just cut open my filter too just to see.. if it's not too hard to install, that is.
I'm not a chemist or mechanic.. I still don't understand, nor do I believe (yet) that 10% ethanol won't [eventually] damage something that 85% ethanol will.
reeves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 09:42 AM   #36
mad_sb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,639
Thanks: 632
Thanked 982 Times in 537 Posts
Mentioned: 100 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I wounder if Robi had a pressure relief valve / regulator failure that caused the pressure the spike enough to damage the filter media....

I'm guessing it won't be long before someone offers a modified 42052D that has the filter removed and an external, inline filter in it's place.
__________________
mad_sb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:10 AM   #37
xjohnx
Grip>Slip
 
xjohnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 13 SWP BRZ Ltd - Innovate Powered!
Location: RVA
Posts: 3,563
Thanks: 656
Thanked 1,717 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by reeves View Post
For that price I might just cut open my filter too just to see.. if it's not too hard to install, that is.
I'm not a chemist or mechanic.. I still don't understand, nor do I believe (yet) that 10% ethanol won't [eventually] damage something that 85% ethanol will.
Looks like it's a bit more than that. $269 ($359 list) is what I'm seeing (assuming we're talking about assembly 14, part # 42021CA000)



http://www.buysubarupartsnow.com/par...em/fuel-supply
xjohnx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to xjohnx For This Useful Post:
reeves (05-30-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 10:18 AM   #38
Visconti
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 05 STi
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 2,843
Thanks: 196
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,197 Posts
Mentioned: 375 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Visconti
Quote:
Originally Posted by robispec View Post
Yeah we talked for exactly 3 questions posed by me and ten sentences total. Long enought for me to figure out you would never get to work on anything I owned.
I POSTED THE POSTING DATE ON THE PICTURE ABOVE.
As usual you assume an attack when none was launched
Now you fabricate and imply a complete lie. With your "word" as the foundation. I think you are, funny I have no dog in this fight...nothing to sell nothing even to work with right now. I was even looking at don's part as a solution. I'm just reporting what happened to me and my experiances with HIGH VOLUME e-85 usage. It's interesting how using 100 octane race fuel gets twisted to "fuel aditives" you want a war start telling someone in this indusrty KNOWN FOR NEVER LYING, hes lying.
You my freind are already known for the exact reverse actions. Keep it up, your just digging your own grave deeper.
I have never said or implyied anything relating to you on this forum that I have not been forced to live through.
After you were done bragging about how sweet your car was you started on how fast it was.. then you started talking to me about how you switched to ethanol. You had mentioned before that you were always running some sort of octane additive at the track because of the crappy 91 octane. That's where I mentioned that octane boosters or racegas didn't show much in gains but ethanol did. You continued to discuss with me that you thought you'd have a bigger gain with ethanol and didnt like how the car didnt start up correctly in the morning... Sound familiar yet? I told you i was surprised you had startup issues with such warm temps...I then told you I would just flash the car for you but you would have to take that hack of a intake off and go back to stock. After you left some of the guys spoke to me... Lets just say there's a reason I didn't pick up your next phone call.

No one ever said you had a dog in this fight , we all want to know what's going on with your filter and if there is a problem and what caused it. But to come on here and say this is a result of 500 gallons of ethanol use.. well that's not accurate.

John
Visconti is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Visconti For This Useful Post:
Calum (05-30-2013), Tujin (05-31-2013)
Old 05-30-2013, 10:21 AM   #39
dabocx
Senior Member
 
dabocx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: United States
Posts: 1,267
Thanks: 564
Thanked 261 Times in 191 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
In before thread lock >_<

Im sure in a year or two we will have some more data on guys that have been running e85 for 2-3 years.
dabocx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:21 AM   #40
Shankenstein
Frosty Carrot
 
Shankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 431 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xjohnx View Post
Not sure how helpful or relavent this may be, but this post has quite a bit of good info on the BRZ fuel system:

http://www.iwsti.com/forums/built-mo...lkthrough.html
Excellent find! Didn't know that the HPFP was cam-driven, went to 3000 psi, or that it has a built-in pressure sensor. It's looking more and more like the EcoBoost setup that I'm familiar with.
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX
Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club
Shankenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:25 AM   #41
Visconti
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 05 STi
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 2,843
Thanks: 196
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,197 Posts
Mentioned: 375 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Visconti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankenstein View Post
Excellent find! Didn't know that the HPFP was cam-driven, went to 3000 psi, or that it has a built-in pressure sensor. It's looking more and more like the EcoBoost setup that I'm familiar with.
I think most direct injection systems run like this.

Mazda's systems are a pity, HPFP failures all the time. We are very luck someone at Toyota/Subaru did there homework when they put the car together.
Visconti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:28 AM   #42
xjohnx
Grip>Slip
 
xjohnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 13 SWP BRZ Ltd - Innovate Powered!
Location: RVA
Posts: 3,563
Thanks: 656
Thanked 1,717 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Mods - Please don't lock this thread. There's a lot of good info in here. If need be, deal with people on a one off basis.
xjohnx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to xjohnx For This Useful Post:
Allch Chcar (07-01-2013), Calum (05-30-2013), civicdrivr (05-31-2013), feldy (05-30-2013), Hardrock4445 (05-31-2013), Sensisnow (05-30-2013), SkullWorks (05-30-2013)
 
Reply

Tags
e85, filter degradation


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AEM High Flow In-Tank Fuel Pump JPxM0Dz Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 0 04-13-2013 01:15 PM
“saddle-shaped” fuel tank ft86Fan Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 13 06-26-2012 05:22 AM
Drop In filter test! Stock, Apexi, No filter RallySport Direct Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 14 06-25-2012 03:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.