follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-08-2014, 12:57 PM   #15
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,632 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Did anyone create a good accurate-ish calibration for this? I've had a go based on my dyno wideband results from the weekend but I know that tailpipe generated results won't be as accurate, so I'd like to see what other have done.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2014, 09:36 PM   #16
ztan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 359 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Resurrecting this thread.

Looking down the Denso doc that arghx7 shared, I see more extended curves later on.

Also looking at stock and Shiv's 1.59 O2 scales, looks like there is a lot more data that can be plugged into the bottom end of the scale, with the 3 cells over 0.43mA not being needed.

Has anyone benchtested the particular sensor that we have and give us scaling values for the rich end of the scale in better resolution?

Off the paper curves (which don't match stock ROM values):
AFR mA
10 -1.8
11 -1.25
12 -0.8
13 -0.45
Attached Images
  
ztan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2014, 03:30 AM   #17
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,632 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ztan View Post
Has anyone benchtested the particular sensor that we have and give us scaling values for the rich end of the scale in better resolution?
EcuTek have and supply it in their documentation....
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2015, 09:00 AM   #18
dave-
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Australia
Posts: 100
Thanks: 47
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ztan View Post
Resurrecting this thread.
And again! @ztan did you make any progress on the scaling changes? Or even test against a proper wideband?
dave- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2015, 06:45 AM   #19
ztan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 311
Thanks: 44
Thanked 359 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave- View Post
And again! @ztan did you make any progress on the scaling changes? Or even test against a proper wideband?
Only got around to it today:

I had a look at the Bosch 4.9 and Denso curves - they are quite similar in mA vs lambda measurements. Our stock ROM reads quite close to the Bosch curve x 0.61.

Made an extended table for the front O2 sensor scaling that is shown below (working down to a 10.5 limit, next testing a 10.0 limit).

The results of that curve vs a PLX SM-AFR (installed last week) with Bosch 4.9 wideband (units in lambda with range from 0.68-1.38) attached. I think that with the extended scaling, the Denso sensor actually performs quite well. The ECU sensor has a smoothed output and I think that is responsible for the higher variability on the lean quadrant of the chart when switching between fueling and deceleration cut.
Attached Images
  
ztan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ztan For This Useful Post:
dave- (02-23-2015), SkAsphalt (02-23-2015)
Old 12-13-2015, 03:20 PM   #20
g0odspeed
Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S Asphault
Location: Cartersville, Ga
Posts: 91
Thanks: 19
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by mad_sb View Post
So, it sounds like the upstream sensor is wideband and the downstream sensor is narrow band.
Did you ever find out for certain if the second sensor was narrow band?
g0odspeed is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Map Sensor Hookup? ft86-UAE Forced Induction 22 01-08-2015 04:56 PM
Is P0108 (MAP sensor) common ? regal Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 0 10-06-2012 01:21 PM
Bad MAF Sensor paulieblaze Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 3 08-23-2012 11:34 PM
How to fool airbag sensor? track_warrior Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 3 07-13-2012 12:46 AM
Stock O2 Sensor d1ck Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 1 07-11-2012 08:16 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.