follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-03-2014, 01:01 PM   #71
FullBlown
Senior Member
 
FullBlown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MN
Posts: 1,171
Thanks: 242
Thanked 2,026 Times in 548 Posts
Mentioned: 298 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tansey86 View Post
Doesn't an intake manifold need to have different size/volume runners to be optimal for forced induction/NA applications respectively? Or is this going to be a universal fix for both?
That is the goal, we are trying to find the balance between the two.
FullBlown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2014, 01:05 PM   #72
cdrazic93
Junior
 
cdrazic93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: a car
Location: Probably at school
Posts: 4,341
Thanks: 3,184
Thanked 2,512 Times in 1,502 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FullBlown View Post
That is the goal, we are trying to find the balance between the two.
If these sell like hot cakes, no one would blame you for splitting them apart and making aspiration specific manifolds
__________________
"Ah! What music! They could have never imagined, those pioneers who invented the automobile, that it would posses us like this, our imaginations, our dreams. Men love women, but even more than that, men love CARS!"-Lord Hesketh
cdrazic93 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cdrazic93 For This Useful Post:
ChrisD (07-22-2015), TouchMyHonda (02-24-2014)
Old 02-03-2014, 01:21 PM   #73
mid_life_crisis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: FR-S 10 #103 AT
Location: NC
Posts: 1,519
Thanks: 101
Thanked 599 Times in 347 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaroYamada View Post
I guess any serious engineer would have done back 2 back comparison on flow bench from old and new
Quote:
Originally Posted by FullBlown View Post
Agree, but what works on paper and theory, doesn't always work in real life. Its too early to assume all that.

There is a process we go through before we make a cast production product. This is just the fist step.
I know it was a typo (or was it?) but that's exactly what he needs.
It's a pity that sometimes you have to feed the trolls because as a vendor you just can't let their insinuations go unchallenged.
__________________
Necessity may be the mother of Invention but Desperation is quite often the father.
“Sex is like Bridge. If you don't have a good partner, you'd better have a good hand.” - Mae West
Papa said, "son there's a lot of evil temptations out there. Best to try 'em all so you know which ones to avoid."
mid_life_crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mid_life_crisis For This Useful Post:
FullBlown (02-03-2014)
Old 02-03-2014, 01:29 PM   #74
Dipstik-sportech
Senior Member
 
Dipstik-sportech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ satin white pearl sportech
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 842
Thanked 911 Times in 576 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yeah I saw his comments and thought they sounded a little condescending

The Frozen North
__________________
2013 SWP BRZ sportech. 11.11sec@129.01mph, 511whp on e70. FullBlown base kit, FullBlown built 9.5:1 engine, GTX3076R GEN2 turbo, 1700cc Bosch injectors, FullBlown flex fuel kit, FullBlown radiator and oil cooler, FullBlown custom 3" dual exit exhaust, act xtreme clutch, whiteline diff and subframe inserts, BC Racing coilovers, hotchkiss 18mm rear sway, is300 3.73 differential ... Never finished
Dipstik-sportech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2014, 01:38 PM   #75
FullBlown
Senior Member
 
FullBlown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MN
Posts: 1,171
Thanks: 242
Thanked 2,026 Times in 548 Posts
Mentioned: 298 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mid_life_crisis View Post
I know it was a typo (or was it?) but that's exactly what he needs.
It's a pity that sometimes you have to feed the trolls because as a vendor you just can't let their insinuations go unchallenged.
We get this all the time, I think we are used to it by now.
FullBlown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2014, 02:13 PM   #76
mid_life_crisis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: FR-S 10 #103 AT
Location: NC
Posts: 1,519
Thanks: 101
Thanked 599 Times in 347 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dipstik-sportech View Post
Yeah I saw his comments and thought they sounded a little condescending

The Frozen North
Ding ding ding! It's only the third day and we already have a contender for understatement of the month.
__________________
Necessity may be the mother of Invention but Desperation is quite often the father.
“Sex is like Bridge. If you don't have a good partner, you'd better have a good hand.” - Mae West
Papa said, "son there's a lot of evil temptations out there. Best to try 'em all so you know which ones to avoid."
mid_life_crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2014, 02:17 PM   #77
DBW
Motorsports
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 19BRZ PP, 16 M4
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 67
Thanks: 36
Thanked 62 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If building a full custom manifold why not move the port injectors further up the runner?
__________________
Douglas W.
DBW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2014, 03:12 PM   #78
FullBlown
Senior Member
 
FullBlown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: MN
Posts: 1,171
Thanks: 242
Thanked 2,026 Times in 548 Posts
Mentioned: 298 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopSpeed View Post
If building a full custom manifold why not move the port injectors further up the runner?
The problem is the further we move it down, the closer the connector gets to the runner, and there isn't much room down there at all.

We would need to move it at least 12mm down to square up a standard tip injectors.
FullBlown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2014, 03:17 PM   #79
Dipstik-sportech
Senior Member
 
Dipstik-sportech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ satin white pearl sportech
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 842
Thanked 911 Times in 576 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mid_life_crisis View Post
Ding ding ding! It's only the third day and we already have a contender for understatement of the month.
I was trying to be nice, I am Canadian it's kinda our thing.

The Frozen North
__________________
2013 SWP BRZ sportech. 11.11sec@129.01mph, 511whp on e70. FullBlown base kit, FullBlown built 9.5:1 engine, GTX3076R GEN2 turbo, 1700cc Bosch injectors, FullBlown flex fuel kit, FullBlown radiator and oil cooler, FullBlown custom 3" dual exit exhaust, act xtreme clutch, whiteline diff and subframe inserts, BC Racing coilovers, hotchkiss 18mm rear sway, is300 3.73 differential ... Never finished
Dipstik-sportech is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dipstik-sportech For This Useful Post:
Brody602 (03-07-2014), FreshFRS (02-04-2014)
Old 02-04-2014, 01:58 PM   #80
DBW
Motorsports
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 19BRZ PP, 16 M4
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 67
Thanks: 36
Thanked 62 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FullBlown View Post
The problem is the further we move it down, the closer the connector gets to the runner, and there isn't much room down there at all.

We would need to move it at least 12mm down to square up a standard tip injectors.
You are confused with what I am saying so I made a picture for you. I was saying should move the port injector further up the runner, so you can take full advantage of having a twin injection setup.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Douglas W.

Last edited by DBW; 02-04-2014 at 02:54 PM.
DBW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2014, 02:39 PM   #81
kbye
Senior Member
 
kbye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 FR-S
Location: Calgary
Posts: 460
Thanks: 64
Thanked 441 Times in 140 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopSpeed View Post
You not following what I am saying so I made a picture for you. I was saying should move the port injector further up the runner, so you can take full advantage of having a twin injection setup.
Maybe I am a bit uneducated on the subject but wouldn't it be more beneficial to have the injectors closer to the port? Having it so far up would mess with timing, no? What is the advantage of having it so high up there?
kbye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2014, 03:01 PM   #82
DBW
Motorsports
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 19BRZ PP, 16 M4
Location: ATLANTA, GA
Posts: 67
Thanks: 36
Thanked 62 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbye View Post
Maybe I am a bit uneducated on the subject but wouldn't it be more beneficial to have the injectors closer to the port? Having it so far up would mess with timing, no? What is the advantage of having it so high up there?
By moving the port injectors up you get the following benefits.

-Lower Intersect angle since the injectors is now on the radius of the runner.
-Increased charge cooling
-Better atomization of the fuel when using large injectors.


Cons of moving them would be poor idle quality and low load throttle response. However since the FA20 uses a dual injection setup the cons would not matter because you could tune those areas using the Direct injection only.

Doug
__________________
Douglas W.
DBW is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DBW For This Useful Post:
Calum (02-04-2014)
Old 02-04-2014, 03:26 PM   #83
Luckrider
My Other Ride's a Jeep
 
Luckrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited
Location: United States
Posts: 893
Thanks: 431
Thanked 253 Times in 198 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopSpeed View Post
By moving the port injectors up you get the following benefits.

-Lower Intersect angle since the injectors is now on the radius of the runner.
-Increased charge cooling
-Better atomization of the fuel when using large injectors.


Cons of moving them would be poor idle quality and low load throttle response. However since the FA20 uses a dual injection setup the cons would not matter because you could tune those areas using the Direct injection only.

Doug
Low throttle response can be tune, but the DI is turned off below a certain RPM (something like 1800) and above a set RPM (usually set around 7000 rpm).
Luckrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2014, 05:05 PM   #84
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckrider View Post
Low throttle response can be tune, but the DI is turned off below a certain RPM (something like 1800) and above a set RPM (usually set around 7000 rpm).

That can be manipulated.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intake Manifold Bu-Tang Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 29 12-06-2014 02:43 PM
Intake manifold cover protpibe Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 16 02-28-2014 07:44 PM
Wanted intake manifold ciro Want-To-Buy Requests 0 09-27-2013 01:03 PM
Aluminium intake manifold? Hempo Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 18 06-27-2013 02:19 PM
WTB: intake manifold carlitosway6891 Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 0 06-22-2013 03:24 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.