follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-13-2013, 10:25 PM   #71
Demandred7
Senior Member
 
Demandred7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2018 Camry XSE V6
Location: Breslau, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,094
Thanks: 1,041
Thanked 367 Times in 228 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
By the time I got to the fourth page, I said to myself, what was this thread about again. I actually had to page back and re-read. I am pretty sure that this thread ended up going in an entirely different direction than the OP intended. All I can say is "wow".

Kudos for trying something different. Haters going to hate. Not sure if you were looking for the kind of feedback that you received. Here is something somewhat constructive though, perhaps inverting the colour scheme and making the tribal pattern red instead of the other way around.

Good luck with your ride.
Demandred7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 02:46 PM   #72
schlomo
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: mazda3, 370z
Location: South Texas
Posts: 69
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
This forum seems to be heading downhill with all the unnecessary negative banter. A lot of you need to lighten up. There's giving an honest opinion and then there is being an internet ****.

I don't mean to rant. It's just that I happen to like this forum and I don't want it to turn into another one of those forums
schlomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 04:52 PM   #73
Whitigir
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 450 awhp twin turbo vr4
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 94
Thanked 273 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by schlomo View Post
This forum seems to be heading downhill with all the unnecessary negative banter. A lot of you need to lighten up. There's giving an honest opinion and then there is being an internet ****.

I don't mean to rant. It's just that I happen to like this forum and I don't want it to turn into another one of those forums
I can see the whole platform heading down the Civic SI path. I do love this forum, and the platform. But being affordable, this is what going to happen. Have you seen someone put their Spoiler on Backward ?
Whitigir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 06:32 PM   #74
kurbkilla
Senior Member
 
kurbkilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Scion FRS (Asphalt)
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 217
Thanks: 63
Thanked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
My old project car for the last 7 years... From 1983 to 2013 thats a big jump
Attached Images
  
kurbkilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 09:10 PM   #75
Bristecom
Senior Member
 
Bristecom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ PP
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 1,707
Thanked 646 Times in 317 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitigir View Post
3800 lbs 3000GT I have was the only good car they made.
Mitsubishi made tons of great cars in the 90's. I have a 99 Eclipse GSX (AWD turbo coupe) and, for me at least, that is likely the best all around car ever made (although it's getting old and obviously isn't perfect).

But I mean, the Lancer Evolutions were great cars (although I'm not the biggest fan of the Evo X even though we have one). But also, the FTO, Galant VR-4, and Pajero Evolution in RHD markets. The amount of innovations they had in the 90's was incredible. First to popularize gasoline direct injection (even though they don't use it anymore which is bazaar), first to popularize balance shafts, first to use helical front limited slip diffs and active center diffs on a production car, highest power per liter for a production car, variable valve timing, active aerodynamics, active suspension, etc. Not to mention, their cars never cost much more than $40k.

But I agree that they are destroying that cool, sporty, race-bred, innovative image of the past and now trying to market as an economy brand. They have gone from being a strong competitor to Toyota, Honda, and Nissan, to being an almost obscure brand like Suzuki. But they aren't bankrupt. They did have troubles but I've never heard them declare bankruptcy. They've just been trying to restructure and go a different direction which could ultimately kill the company... who knows.
__________________
Toyota + Subaru =
Bristecom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 11:16 PM   #76
Whitigir
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 450 awhp twin turbo vr4
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 94
Thanked 273 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bristecom View Post
Mitsubishi made tons of great cars in the 90's. I have a 99 Eclipse GSX (AWD turbo coupe) and, for me at least, that is likely the best all around car ever made (although it's getting old and obviously isn't perfect).

But I mean, the Lancer Evolutions were great cars (although I'm not the biggest fan of the Evo X even though we have one). But also, the FTO, Galant VR-4, and Pajero Evolution in RHD markets. The amount of innovations they had in the 90's was incredible. First to popularize gasoline direct injection (even though they don't use it anymore which is bazaar), first to popularize balance shafts, first to use helical front limited slip diffs and active center diffs on a production car, highest power per liter for a production car, variable valve timing, active aerodynamics, active suspension, etc. Not to mention, their cars never cost much more than $40k.

But I agree that they are destroying that cool, sporty, race-bred, innovative image of the past and now trying to market as an economy brand. They have gone from being a strong competitor to Toyota, Honda, and Nissan, to being an almost obscure brand like Suzuki. But they aren't bankrupt. They did have troubles but I've never heard them declare bankruptcy. They've just been trying to restructure and go a different direction which could ultimately kill the company... who knows.
I agree. Mitsubishi is a Giant company. They are everywhere from Heavy Machinery to Refrigerator to automotive to jets...whatever.

I think the automotive department is trying to head toward EV and hybrid for Green technology.

There are rumor about the new Evo to be Hybrid, and of unique performance.

Check out there Outlander PHEV. That is one phenomenal product. I hope they can gain back what they lost soon. Otherwise, nobody care about Mitsu car anymore.
Whitigir is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Whitigir For This Useful Post:
Bristecom (06-14-2013)
Old 06-14-2013, 11:45 PM   #77
TRD-X
Senior Member
 
TRD-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Da-Big Banana
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 1,199
Thanks: 1,311
Thanked 955 Times in 534 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Who really cares about a Mitsubishi this is a Toyota/Subaru forum say on topic or GTFO this thread.

btw Whitigir do you even plan on getting a FR-S or BRZ if your not then why are you here..??
__________________
Supratwins/TRD-X aka Jim Gone to a higher plane of existence!
TRD-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 11:53 PM   #78
tuckdaddy
Because Racecar
 
tuckdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Boerne, McQueeney, San Antonio -TX
Posts: 1,043
Thanks: 168
Thanked 268 Times in 197 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Garage
THIS^
tuckdaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 07:56 AM   #79
Whitigir
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 450 awhp twin turbo vr4
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 94
Thanked 273 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRD-X View Post
Who really cares about a Mitsubishi this is a Toyota/Subaru forum say on topic or GTFO this thread.

btw Whitigir do you even plan on getting a FR-S or BRZ if your not then why are you here..??
Yet i did talk off topic due to troll!

There is nothing wrong to know more about those cars you dont own. A pure enthusiast knows about most of the sport cars. They live, learn, read, talk about cars, race, track, autocross, modify. They specally dont "mine s better than your, dont care about, stfu, gtfo" stuff.

For a million time, those of "race me bro, mine s better" attitude are all kids 90% of the time. Mind telling me your age TRD-X ?

I have never expected less from this platform. Affordable to kids= childish owners. Similar to eclipse and civic platform, some of the mustangs as well.

Why i dont have one? I cant find myself enjoying it yet. Even though i understand what it does, because i do, so i am waiting for the turbo version of it.
Whitigir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:24 AM   #80
Mikem53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: FR-S 6MT
Location: Somewhere in Space
Posts: 1,565
Thanks: 500
Thanked 882 Times in 433 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitigir View Post
Yet i did talk off topic due to troll!

There is nothing wrong to know more about those cars you dont own. A pure enthusiast knows about most of the sport cars. They live, learn, read, talk about cars, race, track, autocross, modify. They specally dont "mine s better than your, dont care about, stfu, gtfo" stuff.

For a million time, those of "race me bro, mine s better" attitude are all kids 90% of the time. Mind telling me your age TRD-X ?

I have never expected less from this platform. Affordable to kids= childish owners. Similar to eclipse and civic platform, some of the mustangs as well.

Why i dont have one? I cant find myself enjoying it yet. Even though i understand what it does, because i do, so i am waiting for the turbo version of it.
If you are waiting for the turbo version of this car, then you truly DON'T understand what it's about.. The designers intention was to bring a "purist"
Sports car to market. Based on narrow tires, razor sharp handling and a high revving 2.0 L engine in a balanced light weight package. It's well documented that they did not want a turbo charged engine. It's not about power.. It's about balance and feedback for the driver. Once you add more power.. Then the weight goes up along with necessary grip, brakes.. Etc.. And of course price..
Mikem53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:35 AM   #81
Whitigir
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 450 awhp twin turbo vr4
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 94
Thanked 273 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikem53 View Post
If you are waiting for the turbo version of this car, then you truly DON'T understand what it's about.. The designers intention was to bring a "purist"
Sports car to market. Based on narrow tires, razor sharp handling and a high revving 2.0 L engine in a balanced light weight package. It's well documented that they did not want a turbo charged engine. It's not about power.. It's about balance and feedback for the driver. Once you add more power.. Then the weight goes up along with necessary grip, brakes.. Etc.. And of course price..
Understand it is different than being practical for personal use. It is ok if they do not want to turbo charge it. I hear 2015 they might.

There are always other cars. For example, C7 corvette is well balanced, good handling, easy drifting as well. But expensive to maintain.

The main point of the FRS is not only about those you said above, which i agreed completely, it is about having fun with low cost maintenance. They hit it right on the head.

There are people who love after market turbo charge, and there are people who love stock turbo charge, like me. I only hope they do, if they dont, and when i can no longer wait, i can always consider other platforms
Whitigir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:43 AM   #82
TRD-X
Senior Member
 
TRD-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Da-Big Banana
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 1,199
Thanks: 1,311
Thanked 955 Times in 534 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitigir View Post
Yet i did talk off topic due to troll!

There is nothing wrong to know more about those cars you dont own. A pure enthusiast knows about most of the sport cars. They live, learn, read, talk about cars, race, track, autocross, modify. They specally dont "mine s better than your, dont care about, stfu, gtfo" stuff.

For a million time, those of "race me bro, mine s better" attitude are all kids 90% of the time. Mind telling me your age TRD-X ?

I have never expected less from this platform. Affordable to kids= childish owners. Similar to eclipse and civic platform, some of the mustangs as well.

Why i dont have one? I cant find myself enjoying it yet. Even though i understand what it does, because i do, so i am waiting for the turbo version of it.

Like I said are you going to buy a FR-S or BRS don't give me that crap about your waiting on a turbo model. If you want to talk about other cars there's a sub forum for that.

Now to answer your lame ass question I'm a 61 year old retired Marine.
__________________
Supratwins/TRD-X aka Jim Gone to a higher plane of existence!
TRD-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:45 AM   #83
#87
I usually post drunk
 
#87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: BRZ
Location: NY
Posts: 1,487
Thanks: 15
Thanked 490 Times in 231 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRD-X View Post
Like I said are you going to buy a FR-S or BRS don't give me that crap about your waiting on a turbo model. If you want to talk about other cars there's a sub forum for that.

Now to answer your lame ass question I'm a 61 year old retired Marine.
Bruce Willis, is that you?
#87 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to #87 For This Useful Post:
TRD-X (06-15-2013)
Old 06-15-2013, 08:53 AM   #84
Kwaziekeller
Senior Member
 
Kwaziekeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '13 Argento MT FR-S
Location: White Hall, AR
Posts: 215
Thanks: 112
Thanked 97 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by #87 View Post
315/35 sounds like a comfy ride compared to getting 255/35 for a standard 86 18 inch wheel.

I wonder if chevy could reduce the weight significantly what would peoples perception of heavy muscle cars be

I wasnt ever concerned with comfort too much, the SRT8's are pretty stiff riding cars, especially the Charger (stiffest of them). A 315/35 does have a nice sidewall still, 4.6" iirc. It's the fact that the 315's I chose to run (Continential DWS) were $250 each that got to be tiresome, and they were on the cheaper side of pricing (UHP all season and higher treadwear). For two of those I can get a decent set of 4 for the FR-S... but hey... you gotta pay to play and when you're talking SVT, SRT or Corvette... you better bring your checkbook lol.
__________________
Kwaziekeller is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Found Premium Gas That Gave 5HP Dezoris Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 2 12-14-2012 12:34 PM
Finally gave in powertrip Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 11 10-26-2012 11:16 AM
my car gave birth, mystery bolt 7thgear Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 12 08-24-2012 08:02 PM
Just gave up my WRB Limited 6MT 3/14 (7 of 16)preorder in Chicago n7011n BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 6 06-19-2012 10:48 PM
if i gave you 25k to buy a car andygee Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 47 04-17-2011 10:52 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.