|
||||||
| Mechanical Maintenance (Oil, Fluids, Break-In, Servicing) Everything related to the mechanical maintenance of the FR-S and BRZ |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 14
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Manual Transmission Fluid, GL-3 vs. GL-4
So I'm looking into what transmission fluid I want to use and it seems like everyone is recommending a GL-4 spec fluid, when the shop manual for our cars calls for GL-3.
I've been reading the sources on this post: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...77&postcount=9 to try and understand why GL-4 might be better and is ok to run in our cars but I'm not really seeing anything and hoping some one can explain it to me. Here is the spec from the shop manual for reference |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2014 SWP BRZ, MT
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 240
Thanks: 11
Thanked 140 Times in 90 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So that post essentially explains GL-4 vs GL-5. The difference between GL-3 and GL-4 is that GL-4 has a higher lubrication requirement spec than GL-3. And by that I mean there is equipment out there specially designed to test gear oils and simply put a GL-4 oil will sustain more load carrying capacity than GL-3. GL-4 will have more EP additives than GL-3. You can actually see that a substitute product on the list says GL-3 or later. GL-5 just can't be used because the EP level is so high it degrades the copper alloy parts in the trans (aka syncros).
__________________
The answer is racecar. Always.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to zkv476 For This Useful Post: | ducky106 (11-04-2015) |
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2004 Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 681
Thanks: 28
Thanked 273 Times in 200 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
GL-3 is an "inactive" spec according to the API which is why they are difficult, if not impossible, to find.
https://www.lubrizol.com/DrivelineAd...arOil/GL5.html GL-5 can be used if it meets both GL-5 and GL-4. Motul Gear 300 meets both and likely achieves this with the use of metal deactivators. Gear Tribology and Lubrication Part I If you're not comfortable with this, run a gear oil that meets only GL-4 as it has 30-40% less extreme pressure additives. I do believe that a lot of people run Motul Gear 300 in the tranny although YMMV, of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: '13 Ultramarine
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,243
Thanks: 1,476
Thanked 1,165 Times in 685 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@bluesubie I respect your opinions on oils/lubes, and would like your input on the following:
Royal Purple recommends their MaxGear 75W90 lube for transmissions/transaxles that spec a GL-4 or GL-5, but not for a GL-3. For a GL-3 application, they actually recommend their HPS or XPR 10W40 motor oils (not to be confused with the API certified oils). Presumably, this is because of the higher levels of zinc/phosphorus, which should help take the place of some of the EP additives in a GL-5 or 4. I'm thinking about giving this a try on my next drain/fill. What do you think?
__________________
no man with a good car needs to be justified...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2004 Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 681
Thanks: 28
Thanked 273 Times in 200 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I know that many GL-5 oils use very little zinc and the main EP additives are phosphorus and sulfur. The question is how much sulfur is in HPS or XPR and how much is good enough for the twins, or does the high zinc and phosphorus do the trick? Molakule at bobistheoilguy would probably know the answer. RP themselves would probably be helpful as well. As far as the viscosity goes, a 40 grade engine oil is 12.5-16.29 cSt's @ 100C and a 90 grade gear oil is 13.5-23.99 cSt's @ 100C so you'd be on the light end in regards to viscosity. Last edited by bluesubie; 11-06-2015 at 01:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to bluesubie For This Useful Post: | roddy (11-06-2015) |
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: '13 Ultramarine
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,243
Thanks: 1,476
Thanked 1,165 Times in 685 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Here is a link to the cross reference chart:
http://www.royalpurpleconsumer.com/a..._Reference.pdf When I first started looking at fluids, I thought MaxGear was the right stuff until I got digging a little deeper. Looking down through the list, they recommend their non-API oils for quite a few applications, not just the GL-3 spec 75W90. I've tried quite a few different fluids, and mixes in the pursuit of happiness. Other cars may be different, but I have found mine to be sensitive to viscosity. Redline MT-90 was pretty much the same as stock, and their MTL (old label 70W80) was better, but not good enough. So far, I have found Pentosin MTF2 (75W80) gives the best results in shift quality. A ~60/40 mix of Redline MTL/MT-90 is a not too distant 2nd. I'm happy with the Pentosin, but I can never leave well enough alone. If there is a less expensive option that works as well, I'm all for it. I'm curious, and may give it a try anyway just to see. Pentosin states a KV of 7.7mm2/S @ 100 degrees C, but I'm not sure how to convert that. VI is 177.
__________________
no man with a good car needs to be justified...
Last edited by roddy; 11-08-2015 at 06:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2004 Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 681
Thanks: 28
Thanked 273 Times in 200 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
mm2/s is the same as CsT's. http://www.endmemo.com/sconvert/mm2_scst.php |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: '13 Ultramarine
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,243
Thanks: 1,476
Thanked 1,165 Times in 685 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I was going from the top of the chart where it stated 75W90 (and 80W90) GL-3 applications cross to the HPS/XPR, and that GL-4 or 5s would be the MaxGear. The owner's manual for my FR-S specs a GL-3 fluid. I saw that and didn't even look at the product advisor. I'm temped to call, and see what kind of reaction I get when I point out the GL-3...they'd probably think I'm an a-hole, but I genuinely curious.
I didn't know that mm2/s Cst's were the same...should join up over at BITOG, but I spend too much time here. Thanks for the link.
__________________
no man with a good car needs to be justified...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Change your manual transmission fluid ASAP!!! | Kostamojen | Mechanical Maintenance (Oil, Fluids, Break-In, Servicing) | 383 | 12-12-2016 10:29 AM |
| Switched manual transmission fluid. 6-5 grind gone but hard to find 5-4 now. | tracerit | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 6 | 06-30-2015 02:19 AM |
| MT Transmission Fluid | mstoochn | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 1 | 06-14-2015 10:06 PM |
| Any consensus on best manual transmission fluid choice? | qqzj | Mechanical Maintenance (Oil, Fluids, Break-In, Servicing) | 22 | 05-01-2014 07:14 AM |
| topspeed difference between manual transmission and automatic transmission | torquemada | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 51 | 05-04-2012 08:54 PM |