follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-11-2013, 11:34 PM   #1
ATSAaron
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Raven FR-S
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 47
Thanks: 10
Thanked 32 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Guys running EcuTek boost control

Once you unplug the CPC control what do you do about the CPC valve? Does it need to be purged occasionally? The stock CPC map has it open almost anytime you are at idle or cruise.

Aaron
ATSAaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 11:32 AM   #2
Ross
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 85 corolla gts
Location: Chesapeake , Va
Posts: 361
Thanks: 17
Thanked 177 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I have not had any issues with not purging it in my testing
Ross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 01:38 PM   #3
448hpsti
In Test:Oil Fed SC
 
448hpsti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Vortech Prototype Test Car
Location: Hotter than where you are
Posts: 355
Thanks: 156
Thanked 142 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I know it's been done for ages on subaru and while there's no issue, my cars does weird things with the evap system

I'm not convinced the car likes it, really

Something buzzes electrically in the tank, and tank pressures are always high.
448hpsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 01:56 PM   #4
jx86
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: -
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 53
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 448hpsti View Post
I know it's been done for ages on subaru and while there's no issue, my cars does weird things with the evap system

I'm not convinced the car likes it, really

Something buzzes electrically in the tank, and tank pressures are always high.
That being said, would you still go ecutek controlled boost (ebcs to evap) if you were to do it all over again? Or a standalone EBC?
jx86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 07:47 PM   #5
448hpsti
In Test:Oil Fed SC
 
448hpsti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Vortech Prototype Test Car
Location: Hotter than where you are
Posts: 355
Thanks: 156
Thanked 142 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Given the non boosted car has enough issues with heat, when we all boost, we all take on more heat, simple, we assume more of everything, use fuel faster heat fuel faster radiator heats faster tranny heats faster, it's all cumulative. Hot gas has its own management needs.

Why do you think I spent more time testing than tracking? Heat. Back to your question.

Standalone ebc has its pros and cons too, the clean way to tune thru ecutek has its merits but with everything there is trade off, you still need a tuning solution, so if you have it why not use it right? Sure if you need to know my answer, I would not go the ecutek ebcs route on our second car. That evap and emissions stuff is there for a reason, not just EPA compliance, while the are fall backs and safety stuff behind it all to fall back on, boosting something that was never boosted is crazy enough without disabling evap lines. Mind you, the boost control you can achieve if you're willing to loom past evap stuff is every bit as controllable and stable as a standalone. After the viscon-b-que I am looking at all my ever stuff a little more seriously, and inclined to not mess with it, as advice if that's what is being asked. At the end of the day, as a gear head we do things for power, its a call you have to make, if you're gonna do it, if you wanna do it all the time etc. it's a physical connection of a harness, but if you wanted to get creative and have the best of both worlds, the way my map works is in map 1 its factory, so if I reconnect my purge valve, it works oe. Once I connect that line to ebcs pro its a boost controller. So see, it's not all bad.

I would for sure consider ecutek plus standalone, next time. I am sold on boosting the platform for daily drive stuff, but am not yet convinced on the boost vs heat to power to track I think tracking 9psi is a handful of heat, I run more, but have yet to ever feel like my build is done or safe from heat, and that is a fact. So ebcs for daily drive , sure, al day long. Ebcs for track, sure if you can manage the heat
448hpsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 08:43 PM   #6
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 448hpsti View Post
I know it's been done for ages on subaru and while there's no issue, my cars does weird things with the evap system

I'm not convinced the car likes it, really

Something buzzes electrically in the tank, and tank pressures are always high.
Is your gas cap vented or sealed?
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 09:01 PM   #7
nix
Senior Member
 
nix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: AVO BRZ
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,161
Thanks: 997
Thanked 826 Times in 397 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Shrug, my tuner is certain it's only there for emissions. I get a bit of air discharge when the tank is empty & I remove the cap but no more than any of my older cars.
__________________
nix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nix For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (09-13-2013)
Old 09-12-2013, 09:05 PM   #8
FirestormFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Anytown
Posts: 920
Thanks: 73
Thanked 643 Times in 302 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The entire reason for the evaporative emissions control is to keep the vapor from building in the tank and releasing into the atmosphere when you remove the cap.

I'm still not convinced removing the ability to do that is a good thing, but it shouldn't hurt performance.
FirestormFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 10:49 AM   #9
448hpsti
In Test:Oil Fed SC
 
448hpsti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Vortech Prototype Test Car
Location: Hotter than where you are
Posts: 355
Thanks: 156
Thanked 142 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Is your gas cap vented or sealed?
Factory
448hpsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 11:01 AM   #10
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 448hpsti View Post
Factory
A vented gas cap, if you can find one, might prevent the tank from pressuring. That or just disconnect the vacuum line from the top of the tank. I know your big on safey, and probably wouldn't want those vapours venting near the heat of the engine bay. Originally cars just ran vented gas caps to prevent presurizing the tank when the temperature started going up no reason for it to not work not, other then emissions.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 11:07 AM   #11
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nix View Post
Shrug, my tuner is certain it's only there for emissions. I get a bit of air discharge when the tank is empty & I remove the cap but no more than any of my older cars.
The evaporative emissions system is there to prevent un burnt gasoline vapours from escaping into the atmostphere. Unburt vapours are a lot more harmful to the environment then burt gasses. I would certainly recommend venting the vapours somewhere. If you leave it sealed your pump is going to have to work a lot harder if you're on a long drive and the tank starts going into a vacuum.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post:
Frs300 (09-14-2013)
Old 09-14-2013, 10:56 AM   #12
448hpsti
In Test:Oil Fed SC
 
448hpsti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Vortech Prototype Test Car
Location: Hotter than where you are
Posts: 355
Thanks: 156
Thanked 142 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Calum, while I have no data to prove it, but it affect tank pressure in a way that truly scares me
448hpsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2013, 11:33 AM   #13
Frs300
Senior Member
 
Frs300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Pile of junk
Location: florida
Posts: 1,190
Thanks: 264
Thanked 968 Times in 413 Posts
Mentioned: 232 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
The evaporative emissions system is there to prevent un burnt gasoline vapours from escaping into the atmostphere. Unburt vapours are a lot more harmful to the environment then burt gasses. I would certainly recommend venting the vapours somewhere. If you leave it sealed your pump is going to have to work a lot harder if you're on a long drive and the tank starts going into a vacuum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 448hpsti View Post
Calum, while I have no data to prove it, but it affect tank pressure in a way that truly scares me

could always go the vented cap route. but then you run into not having enough pressure in the tank and the pump cavitating and you go lean. if you dont vent it then the pump will just work its ass off like @Calum said.

Got to be a way to keep the CC intact and still run the ebcs
Frs300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2013, 01:10 PM   #14
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frs300 View Post
could always go the vented cap route. but then you run into not having enough pressure in the tank and the pump cavitating and you go lean. if you dont vent it then the pump will just work its ass off like @Calum said.

Got to be a way to keep the CC intact and still run the ebcs
The pump is designed to work at atmospheric pressure. Having pressure in the gas tank on the track is not a good idea.

The easiest and cheapest way is to drill a hole in the cap. Ghetto as hell though.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What kind of wings and aero are you guys running? Evasive Motorsports Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 45 02-23-2017 12:30 PM
EcuTek RaceROM Launch Control just86 Software Tuning 47 03-14-2014 03:55 PM
ECUTek Launch Control in Automatic 01s0uljah Software Tuning 2 08-12-2013 09:45 PM
what upgraded pads are you guys running? ft86me Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 28 07-18-2013 01:22 PM
guys who are running Catless front pipe lxsedan Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 9 06-17-2013 12:52 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.