|
||||||
| Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Raven FR-S
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 47
Thanks: 10
Thanked 32 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Guys running EcuTek boost control
Once you unplug the CPC control what do you do about the CPC valve? Does it need to be purged occasionally? The stock CPC map has it open almost anytime you are at idle or cruise.
Aaron |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 85 corolla gts
Location: Chesapeake , Va
Posts: 361
Thanks: 17
Thanked 177 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I have not had any issues with not purging it in my testing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
In Test:Oil Fed SC
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Vortech Prototype Test Car
Location: Hotter than where you are
Posts: 355
Thanks: 156
Thanked 142 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I know it's been done for ages on subaru and while there's no issue, my cars does weird things with the evap system
I'm not convinced the car likes it, really Something buzzes electrically in the tank, and tank pressures are always high. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: -
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 53
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
That being said, would you still go ecutek controlled boost (ebcs to evap) if you were to do it all over again? Or a standalone EBC?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
In Test:Oil Fed SC
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Vortech Prototype Test Car
Location: Hotter than where you are
Posts: 355
Thanks: 156
Thanked 142 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Given the non boosted car has enough issues with heat, when we all boost, we all take on more heat, simple, we assume more of everything, use fuel faster heat fuel faster radiator heats faster tranny heats faster, it's all cumulative. Hot gas has its own management needs.
Why do you think I spent more time testing than tracking? Heat. Back to your question. Standalone ebc has its pros and cons too, the clean way to tune thru ecutek has its merits but with everything there is trade off, you still need a tuning solution, so if you have it why not use it right? Sure if you need to know my answer, I would not go the ecutek ebcs route on our second car. That evap and emissions stuff is there for a reason, not just EPA compliance, while the are fall backs and safety stuff behind it all to fall back on, boosting something that was never boosted is crazy enough without disabling evap lines. Mind you, the boost control you can achieve if you're willing to loom past evap stuff is every bit as controllable and stable as a standalone. After the viscon-b-que I am looking at all my ever stuff a little more seriously, and inclined to not mess with it, as advice if that's what is being asked. At the end of the day, as a gear head we do things for power, its a call you have to make, if you're gonna do it, if you wanna do it all the time etc. it's a physical connection of a harness, but if you wanted to get creative and have the best of both worlds, the way my map works is in map 1 its factory, so if I reconnect my purge valve, it works oe. Once I connect that line to ebcs pro its a boost controller. So see, it's not all bad. I would for sure consider ecutek plus standalone, next time. I am sold on boosting the platform for daily drive stuff, but am not yet convinced on the boost vs heat to power to track I think tracking 9psi is a handful of heat, I run more, but have yet to ever feel like my build is done or safe from heat, and that is a fact. So ebcs for daily drive , sure, al day long. Ebcs for track, sure if you can manage the heat |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Is your gas cap vented or sealed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: AVO BRZ
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,161
Thanks: 997
Thanked 826 Times in 397 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Shrug, my tuner is certain it's only there for emissions. I get a bit of air discharge when the tank is empty & I remove the cap but no more than any of my older cars.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to nix For This Useful Post: | Sportsguy83 (09-13-2013) |
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Anytown
Posts: 920
Thanks: 73
Thanked 643 Times in 302 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The entire reason for the evaporative emissions control is to keep the vapor from building in the tank and releasing into the atmosphere when you remove the cap.
I'm still not convinced removing the ability to do that is a good thing, but it shouldn't hurt performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
In Test:Oil Fed SC
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Vortech Prototype Test Car
Location: Hotter than where you are
Posts: 355
Thanks: 156
Thanked 142 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
A vented gas cap, if you can find one, might prevent the tank from pressuring. That or just disconnect the vacuum line from the top of the tank. I know your big on safey, and probably wouldn't want those vapours venting near the heat of the engine bay. Originally cars just ran vented gas caps to prevent presurizing the tank when the temperature started going up no reason for it to not work not, other then emissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
The evaporative emissions system is there to prevent un burnt gasoline vapours from escaping into the atmostphere. Unburt vapours are a lot more harmful to the environment then burt gasses. I would certainly recommend venting the vapours somewhere. If you leave it sealed your pump is going to have to work a lot harder if you're on a long drive and the tank starts going into a vacuum.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post: | Frs300 (09-14-2013) |
|
|
#12 |
|
In Test:Oil Fed SC
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Vortech Prototype Test Car
Location: Hotter than where you are
Posts: 355
Thanks: 156
Thanked 142 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Calum, while I have no data to prove it, but it affect tank pressure in a way that truly scares me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Pile of junk
Location: florida
Posts: 1,190
Thanks: 264
Thanked 968 Times in 413 Posts
Mentioned: 232 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
could always go the vented cap route. but then you run into not having enough pressure in the tank and the pump cavitating and you go lean. if you dont vent it then the pump will just work its ass off like @Calum said. Got to be a way to keep the CC intact and still run the ebcs |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The easiest and cheapest way is to drill a hole in the cap. Ghetto as hell though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What kind of wings and aero are you guys running? | Evasive Motorsports | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 45 | 02-23-2017 12:30 PM |
| EcuTek RaceROM Launch Control | just86 | Software Tuning | 47 | 03-14-2014 03:55 PM |
| ECUTek Launch Control in Automatic | 01s0uljah | Software Tuning | 2 | 08-12-2013 09:45 PM |
| what upgraded pads are you guys running? | ft86me | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 28 | 07-18-2013 01:22 PM |
| guys who are running Catless front pipe | lxsedan | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 9 | 06-17-2013 12:52 AM |