for AT, turbo or supercharge?

[StraightOuttaCanadaEh]

Originally Posted by mrg666

Well, low-rpm torque is something very desirable for many other members. At high rpm, I think Edelbrock should be as powerful (maybe a little less) as JRSC. In my opinion, power band feels more like a traditional sports/track car for JRSC and muscle/drag car for Edelbrock. You can choose accordingly.

yeah definitely don't want the muscle/drag characteristics.

[mrg666]

Originally Posted by stlgrym3

Which jrsc do u have? 30 or 38? The positives you listed for jrsc are the exact attributes I’m looking for if I choose to go FI, thanks.

I have c30 since it has slightly better throttle response than c38 as a standard kit. But c38 might be better choice for the ones who want to use HBP with engine build. I won't install HBP but I might do header+retune to add ~30hp this summer. You're welcome and good luck.

[stlgrym3]

Originally Posted by mrg666

I have c30 since it has slightly better throttle response than c38 as a standard kit. But c38 might be better choice for the ones who want to use HBP with engine build. I won't install HBP but I might do header+retune to add ~30hp this summer. You're welcome and good luck.

So c30 is not discounted and replaced by a newer version c38? They both are available for purchase now?

[mrg666]

c30 is still available, afaik.

[tyler_win_photo]

Originally Posted by stlgrym3

i'm leaning toward SC, does our AT tranny can handle 300whp?

As for how much power a transmission can hold, it's more based on torque rather than hp.

SC or turbo it depends on what type of feeling you like out of the car. Turbo gives you a nice shove while SC feels like a larger displacement engine.

A benefit of a turbo on AT cars is that boost is sustained through shifts compared to MT.