![]() |
for AT, turbo or supercharge?
planning for the future, for an AT BRZ, which is a better option? i don't want super crazy 300-400whp, just want about 270whp and 220lb-ft torque, don't want to stress the motor too much. which route should i pick? turbo or supercharge?
|
Well both will give you that, the tuner would adjust the amount of boost. Question is which one would you prefer?
|
“270whp is all I want “ they say
Couple months later ...... “400whp doesn’t seem too bad” Couple thousand dollars later “build the engine and more boost!!!” No it doesn’t apply to everyone but that’s usually the case lol but I would say turbo yes it’s more “complicated” to some people but leaves more room for upgrade in the future. But that’s just my opinion do as you please lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for the op’s original question would you go turbo or supercharger?? No swapping right off the back is not an option lol |
Quote:
Turbos have more potential and cooler noises though..... |
i have a jrsc on e85 hitting 300 whp.
|
Turbo.
You have longer gearing. There's a thread of people swapping out our rear diffs to an IS300 LSD for the longer gearing |
I would say supercharger, Harrop Supercharger. But wait until they get the CARB legal since your info suggest that you are in Cali.
|
this has gone off topic a little. from mechanical stand point, for traditional automatic transmission, supercharge or turbo is better? or it doesn't really matter?
|
Quote:
Nope personal preference Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I have been very happy with my Edelbrock E-Force supercharged Automatic FRS. And for you it's CARB legal.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.