follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-20-2013, 11:39 AM   #15
ScionFrsFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: America
Posts: 702
Thanks: 274
Thanked 119 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The stock box rocks!
__________________
ScionFrsFan
ScionFrsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 04:20 PM   #16
milenko11
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: no
Location: internet
Posts: 85
Thanks: 5
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I just ordered the filter and tube instead so we'll see.
milenko11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 05:03 PM   #17
djdnz
1337
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ WRB S/C
Location: San Jose, CA / Waterloo, ON
Posts: 1,134
Thanks: 776
Thanked 482 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Save your money, as much as I love Perrin's stuff, it doesn't change the fact that intakes are rarely going to net you much horsepower if any. A lot of companies show significant gains, but don't believe every dyno you see (though if I will believe any comapny's dyno, it would be Perrin). Spend your money elsewhere for better return on investment.

My vote goes to saving up for a tune and exhaust.
djdnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 06:06 PM   #18
ChaChas345
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Corolla
Location: LA
Posts: 89
Thanks: 5
Thanked 31 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
* $140 silicon tube.

That's over $450 dollars to put Perrins name under your hood.
So? Go look at other good Intakes that are known / respected in the industry. They sell as high as 1000 for for JDM parts or ARC induction box thats 600+.

Injens is pretty pricey also. It smooths out the air flow which compliments the rest of the other mods the car has. Perring reported saying a silicone tube/CAI added a lot power with the header back system. A difference which IMO is worth it for the price you pay for the CAI/tube if you have a header or cat back already.

A syms racing intake is 1300 not including tax/shipping. Gruppe M's x Revo intake is 2000. Arcs Ram intake is 650, Injens is 350 - 400 I think which from what some people say that leans out the AFR too much which is bad for your car. So 450 for Perrins CAI/Tube isnt bad at all when your paying for quality from a respected company like them. Go ahead buy another intake that will continue to suck up hot air while people who decide to go with the silicone tube/CAI get better performance and quality for what they spend. Airaids loses power, Greddy/AFE add 3-4 whp reported by customers/shop dyno's.

If you have a header back I am sure it would make a huge difference along with the CAI/tube. They compliment each other very nicely. I think Perrin said with the Header back the Silicone tube added 4 whp when combined with the CAI also. Which IMO thats 140 dollars well spent.
ChaChas345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 06:11 PM   #19
ChaChas345
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Corolla
Location: LA
Posts: 89
Thanks: 5
Thanked 31 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by djdnz View Post
Save your money, as much as I love Perrin's stuff, it doesn't change the fact that intakes are rarely going to net you much horsepower if any. A lot of companies show significant gains, but don't believe every dyno you see (though if I will believe any comapny's dyno, it would be Perrin). Spend your money elsewhere for better return on investment.

My vote goes to saving up for a tune and exhaust.
You know most people dont get an intake for power. They get it for the sound/throttle response more than power. Most intakes you see dont add any power if any until you get to the higher rpm's which is rarely ever used.

I would much rather have Perrins CAI than other intakes on the market. Just knowing it is breathing in cool air unlike other intakes on the market that suck in hot air from the engine. Also knowing they dont get gains from just leaning out the AFR like other intakes. People bitching about having to take off the bumpoer are just lazy it takes less than 10 minutes to do.

If you have a header back system then get the CAI/silicone tube. Its worth it in my eyes when you see other vendors selling intakes that cost twice as much for the same amount of power you would get with Perrins. would much rather get Perrins which adds 5 whp and can be improved with the silicone tubing. Also knowing you get cool air is a lot better for peace of mind.
ChaChas345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 06:18 PM   #20
sho220
Senior Member
 
sho220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: FR-S MT & FJ Cruiser
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 292
Thanked 653 Times in 316 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaChas345 View Post
Also knowing they dont get gains from just leaning out the AFR like other intakes.
Isn't leaning out the AFR essentially what all aftermarket intakes are trying to accomplish? Unless you get a tune to go with it...?
__________________
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche comin' down the mountain

sho220 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sho220 For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (01-20-2013)
Old 01-20-2013, 06:35 PM   #21
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaChas345 View Post
You know most people dont get an intake for power. They get it for the sound/throttle response more than power. Most intakes you see dont add any power if any until you get to the higher rpm's which is rarely ever used.

I would much rather have Perrins CAI than other intakes on the market. Just knowing it is breathing in cool air unlike other intakes on the market that suck in hot air from the engine. Also knowing they dont get gains from just leaning out the AFR like other intakes. People bitching about having to take off the bumpoer are just lazy it takes less than 10 minutes to do.

If you have a header back system then get the CAI/silicone tube. Its worth it in my eyes when you see other vendors selling intakes that cost twice as much for the same amount of power you would get with Perrins. would much rather get Perrins which adds 5 whp and can be improved with the silicone tubing. Also knowing you get cool air is a lot better for peace of mind.
But it's also losing ~5whp in the 2500-3000 rpm range. And it only has gains in half the dip. The drop in filter makes gains everywhere.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dimman For This Useful Post:
mike2100 (01-20-2013), NickFRS (01-20-2013), Sportsguy83 (01-20-2013)
Old 01-20-2013, 06:50 PM   #22
milenko11
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: no
Location: internet
Posts: 85
Thanks: 5
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
But it's also losing ~5whp in the 2500-3000 rpm range. And it only has gains in half the dip. The drop in filter makes gains everywhere.
That's why I ordered the filter and tube.
milenko11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 06:54 PM   #23
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaChas345 View Post

-They sell as high as 1000 for for JDM parts or ARC induction box thats 600+.

-A syms racing intake is 1300 not including tax/shipping.

-Gruppe M's x Revo intake is 2000.

-Arcs Ram intake is 650

-Injens is 350 - 400 I think which from what some people say that leans out the AFR too much which is bad for your car.

Wow, I had no idea people would spend that much money on a piece of tube with a MAF sensor mount.

Enjoy.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 06:58 PM   #24
industrial
Add lightness!
 
industrial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 17' WRX
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,253
Thanks: 380
Thanked 888 Times in 411 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I don't think there is anyway I'd pay that much for a tube and filter. This CAI is so overpriced. I just hope it doesn't have issues once people start installing them so at least you are getting the cool induction sound.
industrial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 10:06 PM   #25
SubaSteve
Captain Cocoa
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: CBS BRZ MT
Location: MD
Posts: 597
Thanks: 32
Thanked 282 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Did someone say overpriced?
HKS Racing Suction Reloaded
  • Manufactured by: HKS
Price: $634.38

Also If you think about it other intakes cost around 350. I can get the cai for 280 plus the silicone for 130. Lets do some math 280+130=410. So you are paying an extra 60 bucks so you can have an actual full on cai vs utilizing the stock scoop. It may be the fanboy in me but I doubt perrin put that price tag on it without some sort of reason.



I would really like to see what visconti can get out of this intake hopefully one of his customers picks one up.
SubaSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 10:25 PM   #26
Sportsguy83
I Love custom Turbo kits
 
Sportsguy83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,346 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaChas345 View Post
So? Go look at other good Intakes that are known / respected in the industry. They sell as high as 1000 for for JDM parts or ARC induction box thats 600+.

Injens is pretty pricey also.

I think Perrin said with the Header back the Silicone tube added 4 whp when combined with the CAI also. Which IMO thats 140 dollars well spent.
Quick google search, has the Injen intake at $294, not pricey at all. AFE Takeda intake, (Same as Greedy, well respected company and the intake most tuners say its the best so far for our cars) can be had for about $275, again not pricey at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaChas345 View Post
You know most people dont get an intake for power. They get it for the sound/throttle response more than power. Most intakes you see dont add any power if any until you get to the higher rpm's which is rarely ever used.
You have that wrong. Most people get an intake for performance, SOME people get it only for the sound. This are performance modifications, not beauty modifications. 4 whp for $450 is ridiculous. Nothing wrong with Perrin, its just that the stock intake is THAT good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubaSteve View Post
Did someone say overpriced?

So you are paying an extra 60 bucks so you can have an actual full on cai vs utilizing the stock scoop. It may be the fanboy in me but I doubt perrin put that price tag on it without some sort of reason.
Yes, it is overpriced. Quick example is the AFE Takeda (Greedy), which can be had for about $275 and to date is the best one available (recommended by tuners like Visconti and FA20Club).

I have Perrin parts in my car and think they are AWESOME, but you have to call it what it is.. and that is overpriced.
Sportsguy83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 10:54 PM   #27
FR-S Matt
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsguy83 View Post
Quick google search, has the Injen intake at $294, not pricey at all. AFE Takeda intake, (Same as Greedy, well respected company and the intake most tuners say its the best so far for our cars) can be had for about $275, again not pricey at all.



You have that wrong. Most people get an intake for performance, SOME people get it only for the sound. This are performance modifications, not beauty modifications. 4 whp for $450 is ridiculous. Nothing wrong with Perrin, its just that the stock intake is THAT good.



Yes, it is overpriced. Quick example is the AFE Takeda (Greedy), which can be had for about $275 and to date is the best one available (recommended by tuners like Visconti and FA20Club).

I have Perrin parts in my car and think they are AWESOME, but you have to call it what it is.. and that is overpriced.
After using the aFe oiled for a few days now, it is pretty incredible. No messing with the front bumper post OEM removal. It sucks up the cold air the front bumper already receives. Has a very slick look to it as well, and to me, I love the sound of an intake.

Getting to the filter is as simple as removing 2 bolts, and loosening two clamps for clean and reoil. I am very satisfied with it, but price wise, it is not for everyone. If aesthetics isn't your thing, then go drop in filter and a tube. The aFe Takeda is probably one of the best looking intakes for the car. My butt dyno feels the power pickup from just using it for a few days. I do intend on getting a tune when I get my header + headerback installed to really feel the gains.
FR-S Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FR-S Matt For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (01-20-2013)
Old 01-20-2013, 10:59 PM   #28
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
But it's also losing ~5whp in the 2500-3000 rpm range. And it only has gains in half the dip. The drop in filter makes gains everywhere.
This is what I noticed also... I think they need to run dyno vs dyno on the same day with the same stock car to get bullet proof data to compare their products for the community and may even help their sales if the data is more convulsive. Also a dyno on the same day with the silicone tube would be cool.

Stock dyno pull.
Stock dyno pull with silicone tube.
Stock dyno pull with cai.
Stock dyno pull with drop in filter.
Stock dyno pull with cai and silicone tube.
Stock dyno pull with drop in filter and silicone tube.

^ that alone all on the same day so the conditions are the same will bring valid data to the customer base and will help us know exactly what we are getting out of their products.

Last edited by NickFRS; 01-21-2013 at 04:02 AM.
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Best Drop in Air Filter? FT-86- Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 46 06-05-2014 08:54 AM
FS: K&N Drop-in Filter DookDookDGM Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 4 01-19-2013 02:45 AM
Muffler Delete + Perrin Drop-in Filter SkitterSkotter Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 20 10-10-2012 02:23 PM
Drop In filter test! Stock, Apexi, No filter RallySport Direct Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 14 06-25-2012 03:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.