follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

View Poll Results: Do you plan to use an oil cooler?
Yes, prepackaged kit 77 71.96%
Yes, fab my own 18 16.82%
No 12 11.21%
Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2013, 01:52 PM   #57
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Yeah without preventing air from bypassing the radiator (and other coolers) it'll be tough to make sure air flow isn't described. We won't find an oil cooler to fill the space completely so that's unavoidable too
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 02:19 PM   #58
RYU
Senior Member
 
RYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: really slow...
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 737
Thanks: 340
Thanked 253 Times in 145 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rice_classic View Post
In the that other VMIC thread where the turbo FRS was driven at the track, the host commented that it "got hot" and in that he was referring to the Coolant. If the cooling capacity of the radiator is already taxed, trying to cool your 300F oil may not be the right route to take in addressing your heating/cooling problems. In this case having your oil cooling separate from your coolant cooling will be more effective in evacuating heat.
Agree here also. I like oil-to-water in general because the heat transfer coefficient of water is way better than air. In other words, oil-to-water is better than oil-to-air. However, if the heat being evacuated from the oil goes into an already hot water/coolant then you're also SOL (what @rice_classic is saying). I also like that you don't need an oil cooler thermostat because the engine coolant will regulate the oil temp in the internal oil cooler. It's all a pro/con compromise I guess.

Only testing will tell! Again, please post your results.

I still contest that a radiator designed for low air flow (i.e. better fin design) and made out of copper (copper has better heat transfer coefficient than aluminum at the expense of weight) is the right solution for FI applications where FMIC are used.
RYU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 03:17 AM   #59
rice_classic
Senior Member
 
rice_classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Nevermorange FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,175
Thanks: 758
Thanked 4,215 Times in 1,809 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
I'll drink to that!
__________________
PRO86 | WTCC | STL
rice_classic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 03:30 AM   #60
Supermassive
Senior Member
 
Supermassive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S Whiteout
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 1,406
Thanks: 116
Thanked 831 Times in 360 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Garage
I think the biggest problem with the stock radiator is that its rather thin compared to what i am used to. Here's a comparison to a koyo core for our car:



Thats not a lot of surface area, so i could see why this car has heat issues especially if the water pump is pushing water through that skinny core faster than it can cool it. With the added surface area of an aftermarket core i think the flow will also slow a bit to allow the water to cool more before leaving the radiator. I could be really wrong but, I'm pretty sure the added volume + cooling area would effectively cool the engine better.
Supermassive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 03:57 AM   #61
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supermassive View Post
Thats not a lot of surface area, so i could see why this car has heat issues especially if the water pump is pushing water through that skinny core faster than it can cool it. With the added surface area of an aftermarket core i think the flow will also slow a bit to allow the water to cool more before leaving the radiator. I could be really wrong but, I'm pretty sure the added volume + cooling area would effectively cool the engine better.
Surface area is key.
The speed of the water actually is the opposite; The faster the water moves through, the more passes it makes through the radiator in the same amount of time, the smaller the temperature variation, and the greater turbulence/surface velocity helps improve thermal conductivity by a little. However in a car engine, the water is flowing pretty quickly so this isn't something you have to worry much about.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 04:02 AM   #62
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by RYU View Post
Agree here also. I like oil-to-water in general because the heat transfer coefficient of water is way better than air. In other words, oil-to-water is better than oil-to-air. However, if the heat being evacuated from the oil goes into an already hot water/coolant then you're also SOL (what @rice_classic is saying). I also like that you don't need an oil cooler thermostat because the engine coolant will regulate the oil temp in the internal oil cooler. It's all a pro/con compromise I guess.

Only testing will tell! Again, please post your results.

I still contest that a radiator designed for low air flow (i.e. better fin design) and made out of copper (copper has better heat transfer coefficient than aluminum at the expense of weight) is the right solution for FI applications where FMIC are used.
You don't want an oil cooler thermostat because you want the oil to warm up quickly upon starts, and that means absorbing heat from the water in the warmup phase before the coolant thermostat opens.

While copper sounds attractive at first, you have to remember that "copper" usually means brass tubes, joined with something like solder, which don't have great thermal conductivity. On top of that, brass, copper, and tin are all over 3 times the density of aluminum, and you might need to start paying attention to corrosion in the aluminum block though the antifreeze usually makes it a non-issue. An aluminum radiator of the same mass can be bigger and ultimately transfer more heat.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 10:25 AM   #63
RYU
Senior Member
 
RYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: really slow...
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 737
Thanks: 340
Thanked 253 Times in 145 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
You don't want an oil cooler thermostat because you want the oil to warm up quickly upon starts, and that means absorbing heat from the water in the warmup phase before the coolant thermostat opens.

While copper sounds attractive at first, you have to remember that "copper" usually means brass tubes, joined with something like solder, which don't have great thermal conductivity. On top of that, brass, copper, and tin are all over 3 times the density of aluminum, and you might need to start paying attention to corrosion in the aluminum block though the antifreeze usually makes it a non-issue. An aluminum radiator of the same mass can be bigger and ultimately transfer more heat.
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think we're both agreeing that you don't want an oil cooler thermostat for the oil-to-water. You will need one (or should run one) if you have a stand alone oil-to-air cooler.

A copper solution still has merit, though I do echo some of your concerns. Let's wait and see... I know the copper vs. alum heat exchanger has been a debate for decades and i've been surprised by what i've seen especially in the Server CPU world.
RYU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 10:29 AM   #64
RYU
Senior Member
 
RYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: really slow...
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 737
Thanks: 340
Thanked 253 Times in 145 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supermassive View Post
I think the biggest problem with the stock radiator is that its rather thin compared to what i am used to. Here's a comparison to a koyo core for our car:



Thats not a lot of surface area, so i could see why this car has heat issues especially if the water pump is pushing water through that skinny core faster than it can cool it. With the added surface area of an aftermarket core i think the flow will also slow a bit to allow the water to cool more before leaving the radiator. I could be really wrong but, I'm pretty sure the added volume + cooling area would effectively cool the engine better.
Is that koyo 100% drop in? Does it use the OEM fans or do they provide/recommend aftermarket fans? Does it keep the AC condensers?
RYU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 11:07 AM   #65
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RYU View Post
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think we're both agreeing that you don't want an oil cooler thermostat for the oil-to-water. You will need one (or should run one) if you have a stand alone oil-to-air cooler.


I would definitely run one with a seperate oil-to-air cooler, unless it's an endurance race car then it's fine without one
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 03:54 PM   #66
Supermassive
Senior Member
 
Supermassive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S Whiteout
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 1,406
Thanks: 116
Thanked 831 Times in 360 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by RYU View Post
Is that koyo 100% drop in? Does it use the OEM fans or do they provide/recommend aftermarket fans? Does it keep the AC condensers?
100% drop in heres the link to the site where they go step by step for the install:

http://www.garagefrs.com/koyo-radiator-install/
Supermassive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 06:24 PM   #67
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by RYU View Post
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think we're both agreeing that you don't want an oil cooler thermostat for the oil-to-water. You will need one (or should run one) if you have a stand alone oil-to-air cooler.

A copper solution still has merit, though I do echo some of your concerns. Let's wait and see... I know the copper vs. alum heat exchanger has been a debate for decades and i've been surprised by what i've seen especially in the Server CPU world.
Haha yup, I machined some waterblocks for my computer when I was in 8th grade so I know all about that. For a car low mass is really important, and since the block is already aluminum you might as well just use aluminum for compatibility. It's a pretty clear choice imo, especially since the radiators in the market are all aluminum.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 08:01 PM   #68
Stealthx
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: 370z,Evo X
Location: Virginia
Posts: 48
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
If you track or mod the car, there is NO negative to an oil cooler. There are only positives. It helps your engine in general to stay cooler and have a better life expectancy when it's being thrashed on. And if your boosted, it aam cools engine and possibly turbo oil etc. for the most part, I would say fab your on. Don't be scared, it's extremely simple. And it will save a lot f money. Mostly you an also have higher quality parts and lines and cooler core like setrab for instance. Don't skimp on an extremely effective and reliability parts of the car/build. Pm me if anyone needs info of what they need or where to get pars. I've built plenty of them for all my cars, most notably the 370z which everyone knows ran very hot.
Stealthx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 08:17 PM   #69
RYU
Senior Member
 
RYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: really slow...
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 737
Thanks: 340
Thanked 253 Times in 145 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealthx View Post
If you track or mod the car, there is NO negative to an oil cooler. There are only positives. It helps your engine in general to stay cooler and have a better life expectancy when it's being thrashed on. And if your boosted, it aam cools engine and possibly turbo oil etc. for the most part, I would say fab your on. Don't be scared, it's extremely simple. And it will save a lot f money. Mostly you an also have higher quality parts and lines and cooler core like setrab for instance. Don't skimp on an extremely effective and reliability parts of the car/build. Pm me if anyone needs info of what they need or where to get pars. I've built plenty of them for all my cars, most notably the 370z which everyone knows ran very hot.
Glad you chimed in. +1 on the Setrab units. I'll probably use the Mocal sandwich plate but not sure if I can use AN10 fittings/hoses with that yet. There's the new slip fit high pressure hose people use these days but the lack of a fastener scares me. You have good luck with these?

You can see the slip-fit fittings i'm talking about here. It's the black hose butted up against the plastic collar on the AN10 elbow fitting.
RYU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013, 10:38 PM   #70
JoeBoxer
Senior Member
 
JoeBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,154
Thanks: 1,666
Thanked 1,627 Times in 997 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
My distributor has pricing for the Perrin kits now, much more reasonable than the hks or Greddy. Pm me if interested I think it's pretty reasonable I plan to get one if I ever get boosted.
JoeBoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does one change the oil in an oil cooler? Captain Snooze Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 29 05-09-2016 05:42 PM
Oil Cooler wootwoot Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 92 12-27-2014 08:10 PM
ARC Oil Cooler ill86 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 19 10-18-2014 04:30 PM
One-Off Oil Cooler? wootwoot Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 37 07-18-2014 05:42 PM
Cooler than drifting! Rampage Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 8 04-03-2012 12:55 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.