follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2012, 05:44 PM   #15
Toyobaru808
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: FR-S
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 112
Thanks: 22
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
What about DMEs? I want to wait for whitelines but it would be nice if we had a price estimate b/c if theyre priced over 600 id be turned off

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Toyobaru808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 09:58 PM   #16
bpracer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Asphalt FR-S
Location: DFW, Texas, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 17
Thanked 47 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supermassive View Post
...Some people will say that the threaded rod is a weak point, but after seeing the Cusco arms and GT Spec which are just stamped and welded steel vs. the machined block of aluminum with steel fittings that comprise the AP unit, the extra cost is worth it.
...
I would have to agree with being a bit nervous about that design. The threaded rod joint too far in the middle of the control arm and it will flex and fail on the threaded part of the adjustment rod. There's a reason they put rod ends at the very end of the other suspension arms.

I saw a similar setup for upper control arms. Easy to adjust, looked way over-built, but it failed because a threaded rod shouldn't be in any kind of bending moment.
__________________
Asphalt FR-S
1965 Mustang Vintage Road Racer
Ducati Paul Smart 1000LE
Ducati 848
bpracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 10:09 AM   #17
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Garage
I would rather have the "weak" point (threaded rod) inboard of the shock mounting rather than between the wheel and the shock.

All the force exerted on the shock is going to be from the wheel, if you put the weak point between those two then you have a potential failure point. With it inboard like these the only load it's carrying is the load required to keep the arm in place plus any side to side loads.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 01:14 PM   #18
bpracer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Asphalt FR-S
Location: DFW, Texas, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 17
Thanked 47 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
I would rather have the "weak" point (threaded rod) inboard of the shock mounting rather than between the wheel and the shock.

All the force exerted on the shock is going to be from the wheel, if you put the weak point between those two then you have a potential failure point. With it inboard like these the only load it's carrying is the load required to keep the arm in place plus any side to side loads.
I agree with what you are saying, but the in-board rod end design in this case is not as "in-board" as I would want.
__________________
Asphalt FR-S
1965 Mustang Vintage Road Racer
Ducati Paul Smart 1000LE
Ducati 848
bpracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 01:18 PM   #19
Dezoris
Senior Member
 
Dezoris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: FR-S
Location: IL
Posts: 2,857
Thanks: 519
Thanked 2,998 Times in 1,095 Posts
Mentioned: 159 Post(s)
My camber was. -0.1 rear left -1.1 rear right. Had the whiteline rear upper control arm eccentric bushings installed.
__________________
Dezoris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 01:53 PM   #20
Boosted
Senior Member
 
Boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 13 brz, 06 STI
Location: Mid-Atlantic region
Posts: 268
Thanks: 59
Thanked 135 Times in 82 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
I used whitelines rear chamber kit. I have a even -2.3 on both sides. I have buddy club racing coilovers. The upper control arm kit is great but the old part is press fitted so its a pain to remove.

-Alex
__________________
2013 BRZ Limited build: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...d=1#post586737
2006 STI- lots of go fast goodies 551whp/491 Tq on 93(weekend car)
1988 CRX si- b16A1 (Sold)
RIP 2003 WRX
Boosted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:55 PM   #21
gdrider77
Senior Member
 
gdrider77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 623
Thanks: 243
Thanked 263 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
So whats a good number we should be looking for? I currently have Eibach sportlines and -2 on rear left, -2.4 rear right. Was looking at adding the whileline bushings, will that get me back to .0?

Thanks
__________________
gdrider77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:55 PM   #22
JoeBoxer
Senior Member
 
JoeBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,154
Thanks: 1,666
Thanked 1,627 Times in 997 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdrider77 View Post
So whats a good number we should be looking for? I currently have Eibach sportlines and -2 on rear left, -2.4 rear right. Was looking at adding the whileline bushings, will that get me back to .0?

Thanks
You don't want to be at 0 camber, i am about -1.5 on the rear which is pretty conservative but i don't have as much drop as you. What you have actually isn't terrible is that with you in the car?
JoeBoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 04:28 PM   #23
gdrider77
Senior Member
 
gdrider77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 623
Thanks: 243
Thanked 263 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBoxer View Post
You don't want to be at 0 camber, i am about -1.5 on the rear which is pretty conservative but i don't have as much drop as you. What you have actually isn't terrible is that with you in the car?

Thats with the printout the dealer gave me, how can i check with myself in the car?
__________________
gdrider77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 04:31 PM   #24
JoeBoxer
Senior Member
 
JoeBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,154
Thanks: 1,666
Thanked 1,627 Times in 997 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdrider77 View Post
Thats with the printout the dealer gave me, how can i check with myself in the car?
It won't change much with your weight in the driver seat but if it closened the gap any at all i probably would be ok with it. What's the toe look like?
JoeBoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 06:27 PM   #25
SubieNate
Senior Member
 
SubieNate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Ultramarine
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 959
Thanks: 288
Thanked 560 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Do we really need more than a degree or so of static camber in the rear with the multilink setup? They're supposed to have better dynamic camber curves than a McPherson correct?

Nathan
SubieNate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 06:51 PM   #26
Surok
Wise old man
 
Surok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 86 GTS
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,003
Thanks: 999
Thanked 240 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
threaded rods just scare me now.. i once had an R34 GTR go off in front of me on some touge when his rear ikeya formula adjustable arm threaded rod end sheared off. scared me for life.
Surok is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Surok For This Useful Post:
nix (01-08-2013)
Old 12-11-2012, 12:42 PM   #27
gdrider77
Senior Member
 
gdrider77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 623
Thanks: 243
Thanked 263 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBoxer View Post
It won't change much with your weight in the driver seat but if it closened the gap any at all i probably would be ok with it. What's the toe look like?
This is the printout from the dealer.

__________________
gdrider77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:58 PM   #28
JoeBoxer
Senior Member
 
JoeBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,154
Thanks: 1,666
Thanked 1,627 Times in 997 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Get some oem camber bolts for the front you need some negative camber up there. Rear is a judgement call I'd probably get some spc lower control arms to bring it back down to -1.8 or so.
JoeBoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adjustable Camber Arms vs. Whiteline Camber Bushings digital_assassin Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 70 06-02-2013 06:06 AM
Rear camber adjustment options? zooki Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 24 09-12-2012 10:46 AM
Camber plates Captain Snooze AUSTRALIA 7 07-02-2012 06:51 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.