|
||||||
| Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#505 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2012 Toyota GT 86 Manual
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Posts: 193
Thanks: 37
Thanked 77 Times in 44 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
|
offset usually helps lol
__________________
Current: '12 Toyota GT 86 Pearl White Manual
Previous: '96 Toyota Supra SZ-R |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to RZ86 For This Useful Post: | 20valvewynn83 (12-10-2012) |
|
|
#506 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Some rust bucket
Location: Polar ice cap
Posts: 3,058
Thanks: 312
Thanked 1,046 Times in 556 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
|
i was talking about aftermarket 17'' vs aftermarket 18'', not stock 17'' vs aftermarket 18''. for example, rpf1 17'' vs rpf1 18'', i see no reason to get the 18'' unless you have a big brake kit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#507 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 SCION FR-S FIRESTORM RED
Location: CAMP LEJEUNE, NC
Posts: 332
Thanks: 173
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
|
40offset
|
|
|
|
|
|
#508 |
|
Functionally Retarded
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: LinkECU V6 MR2 - MKVII Golf R
Location: PNW
Posts: 709
Thanks: 81
Thanked 425 Times in 205 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
|
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11885
Search function works wonders. Also look in the fitment sticky at the top of the board next time. And I hope those aren't the wheels you're looking at... Because what you posted is 4 lug.
__________________
1991 MR2 - T-tops - Crimson Red - 1MZ-FE 3.0L - Other Stuff
![]() I'm not really an asshole, but I play one on the internet. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to deucethemoose For This Useful Post: | stout90 (12-08-2012) |
|
|
#509 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru brz limited wr blue
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 140
Thanks: 56
Thanked 42 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Do you guys agree with going aftermarket 17 rather than 18? (Ie 17x8 vs 18x8) for performance? But for looks as well I like the fit of an 18 and nothing larger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#510 |
|
SLO NO MO
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: '19 Tesla Model 3 Performance
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 224
Thanked 1,062 Times in 738 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
|
You can get lightweight 18's, so no I don't agree that 17's are the definitive must-have size for performance. For saving money? Definitely 17's. For staying in a particular stock class? Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#511 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Some rust bucket
Location: Polar ice cap
Posts: 3,058
Thanks: 312
Thanked 1,046 Times in 556 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
|
aesthetically, i think 18 looks too big on those tiny brake rotors. you can always upgrade to a big brake kit, but that's an entirely different story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#512 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 SCION FR-S FIRESTORM RED
Location: CAMP LEJEUNE, NC
Posts: 332
Thanks: 173
Thanked 65 Times in 50 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
|
No not these exact ones but Thts the style the ones I'm looking at are 5x100 18x9.5 with +30 offset in rear and 8.5 fronts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#513 |
|
Señor Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: white BRZ 6MT
Location: Rockland, NY
Posts: 1,554
Thanks: 740
Thanked 374 Times in 248 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
|
that should fit ok, depending on what the front offset is and the tire.
but the rim size alone is safe
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#514 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru brz limited wr blue
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 140
Thanks: 56
Thanked 42 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
I will upgrade the brakes and suspension if I swap to larger wheels. But if I stuck to 17" I could just keep my brakes and suspension...to support a wheel assumingly similar Specs and possibly lighter weight. Hmmm I'll have to decide what I'd want to spend my money on. Once I buy those wheels...I buy those tires...haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#515 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2015 Mustang GT (on order)
Location: San Diego
Posts: 904
Thanks: 114
Thanked 471 Times in 208 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
|
I bet you could stretch them onto a 17x10 MAX. It would look retarded. 17x9 would look pretty dumb too. 17x8 would fit fine.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#516 |
|
SLO NO MO
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: '19 Tesla Model 3 Performance
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 224
Thanked 1,062 Times in 738 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
|
Whtefrs has a post in the member classified wheel section that shows his 17x9 Rotas for sale with stock tires on them.
If you're into stretch, I guess its acceptable, but I personally wouldn't do it. The stock Primacy's are pretty narrow to begin with. Here's the pic: |
|
|
|
|
|
#517 |
|
Hypnotic FRS Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: FR-S [Raven]
Location: SandyEggo
Posts: 566
Thanks: 31
Thanked 106 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
|
17" +45 v +35
Ok, so im read so many thread that i got a headache after weeks - let me ask this a different way. I dont want to hear about how much more flush 35 is then 45 - i get that. i also get the pretty factor of how it looks better.
if i go with 17x7.5 and were to go with the 35 offset - what is the pro-con in the handling dept ? I love the stock handling - which is why i wont go to 18x8.. i heard too heavy and different handling characteristics. btw, im not a track guy but i love to drive agressively and want to keep the stock feel with better tires. so , that being said - if i were to get new 17x7.5 @ 225/45-17 -- what do i do ? recommendations ? 35 or 45/48 ? will the 35 do anything bad ? ive heard everything from putting extra strain on the wheel bearings to changing the handling characteristiccccs. ugh too much info Last edited by rikdrt1; 12-10-2012 at 12:19 AM. Reason: change |
|
|
|
|
|
#518 |
|
Señor Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: white BRZ 6MT
Location: Rockland, NY
Posts: 1,554
Thanks: 740
Thanked 374 Times in 248 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
|
basically the +35 is going to give you a wider track
engineers/scientists please correct me if I'm wrong but: all else equal you'll get more cornering power but slightly more steering effort track will be increased by 20mm compared to the +45, which is only like 3/4 of an inch? honestly it doesn't sound like a huge change and it will look way better on +35. but if you like the stock handling then why are you changing the wheel/tire combo to begin with?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| fitment, flush, offset, rays volk te37's, rims, rotas, size, spacers, width |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Determining the proper width size of the tire | CyberFormula | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 49 | 05-23-2014 09:11 AM |
| Correct tire width for each wheel width | DarrenDriven | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 10 | 08-16-2012 02:03 PM |
| TIRE SIZE CALCULATOR | White64Goat | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 6 | 08-15-2012 02:31 AM |
| Tire Width vs Wheel Width | Synack | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 40 | 08-12-2012 11:21 PM |