follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-18-2012, 02:26 AM   #15
JonnyRocket
"New hotness"
 
JonnyRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: WRB Limited MT BRZ
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 480
Thanks: 186
Thanked 290 Times in 116 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus808 View Post
just wondering, if you do minor mods like changing the exhaust or adding carbon fibre bits, would that throw the balance of the car off quite a bit?
I remember doing centre of gravity calculations in school, and it can change it a lot, so I just want to see what everyone else thinks.
The amount of weight saved by these type of parts does not significantly affect the 'balance' of vehicle. "Adding carbon fibre bits" will in fact add weight. Not to mention most carbon pieces are carbon in look only. True, engineered, light weight carbon parts are not the kind where you can see a pretty weave pattern under clear coat. A good aftermarket exhaust will only save you a handful of pounds as well. We're talking about a nearly 3,000 lb vehicle. The weight of the driver, or the fullness of tank has more of an effect than than the weight of most other pieces.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus808 View Post
also, beginner rwd question. I've only had a bit of seat time in a 335i and c63 AMG, so I'm not too familiar with rwd since I daily drive a fwd. I understand that the frs and brz have amazing handling and balance, but what happens if you accelerate in a turn? wouldn't the back end always come loose?
No. The rear wheels will only come loose when they overcome the kinetic friction between the road and tires. In fact, when racing you ideally want to have completed all of your breaking prior to the turn. That way you can be on the power through-and out of the turn. RWD is typically the preferred setup in race cars because then the wheels each have separate jobs. You see, with a RWD car the front wheels steer and the rear wheels provide power (all wheels brake). With a FWD car, the front wheels steer and have to provide power (as well as brake). An AWD car is great for low traction situations because all wheels can provide power, but you're still taxing the front wheels by asking them to do three things at once.

As others have mentioned, FWD typically understeer or "push" through corners with the nose of the vehicle pushing wide through turns. AWD also usually do this because of what I said in the earlier paragraph, as well as the fact that most AWD systems are based on a FWD layout. The beauty of RWD is that they tend to oversteer, where the rear of the vehicle will tend to swing wide. ***Caveat: there are MANY factors beyond FWD/RWD that affect over/understeer characteristics, these are generalizations.*** The tendency to oversteer can help the RWD drive car to steer through a turn by applying a bit more throttle, to break the back loose a bit and turn the car a bit more.

As another poster mentioned, a common mistake people new to RWD make is letting off the throttle in a turn. This can be very bad. This induces "throttle-off-oversteer" in which the rear suspension becomes unloaded (weight is transferred forward) and the rear of the car looses grip. This typically induces a catastrophic spin.

Other factors: tire grip, road surface, weight balance (FWD tends to be front heavy, RWD tends to have a better distribution), camber, caster, mechanical and pneumatic trail, suspension type, roll center, c.o.g., etc!!!
__________________
...SOLD my WRB BRZ...

Replaced with a 2013 Mazdaspeed3!
JonnyRocket is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JonnyRocket For This Useful Post:
Atticus808 (11-18-2012)
Old 11-18-2012, 10:27 AM   #16
Atticus808
Senior Member
 
Atticus808's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Splash Mountain
Location: Disneyland
Posts: 1,057
Thanks: 940
Thanked 2,337 Times in 918 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
great replies! thanks a lot
now I understand rwd way more (in theory)
just have to go get this car now!

and correct me if I'm wrong. from the comments I gather, it seems as though rwd cars have A LOT more room to work with in a turn.
Atticus808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 12:00 PM   #17
RaceR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2010 Cooper S, 74 Beetle
Location: Norway
Posts: 726
Thanks: 239
Thanked 252 Times in 124 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus808 View Post
and correct me if I'm wrong. from the comments I gather, it seems as though rwd cars have A LOT more room to work with in a turn.
In general I would say a RWD have more room to work with considering it is easier to adjust the balance. But since you have more room to work with its harder to drive on the limit. But when you do its so much more rewarding.
A FWD/AWD is for the average person easier to drive faster. It is easier to utilize most of the grip. But less fun and generally less work.
Many people find less work and just going fast to be more rewarding without having to balance the car that much.
RaceR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RaceR For This Useful Post:
Atticus808 (11-18-2012)
Old 11-18-2012, 12:55 PM   #18
einzlr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: several
Location: norcal
Posts: 903
Thanks: 421
Thanked 286 Times in 223 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus808 View Post
great replies! thanks a lot
now I understand rwd way more (in theory)
just have to go get this car now!

and correct me if I'm wrong. from the comments I gather, it seems as though rwd cars have A LOT more room to work with in a turn.
That's not an unreasonable way to look at it. In FWD the car is being pulled by the front wheels, whereas in RWD it's being pushed by the rears. The reason you spin if you decelerate rapidly in a turn (this can be by braking or simply by lifting off the throttle) is that the deceleration causes the mass of the car to be thrown forward (picture what happens to occupants and loose objects inside the car, well the same thing happens to the car itself; animators often way exaggerate the effect so picturing a cartoon car coming to an abrupt stop gives you a good idea of how it works). When this happens, the traction wheels (rears) lose traction and swing around. Conversely, if you accelerate in a turn, mass goes to the rears and away from the steering wheels so they lose grip and the car straightens out. If you go to a car control clinic or other event where a skidpad is available, you can try this out for yourself.
__________________
Asphalt FR-S MT (future)
'05 Hyundai Accent; '01 BMW M Coupe; '01 BMW M Roadster (for sale); '99 BMW Z3 Coupe 2.8l (for sale)

"Simplicate and add lightness." - Gordon Hooton
einzlr is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to einzlr For This Useful Post:
Atticus808 (11-18-2012)
Old 11-18-2012, 02:14 PM   #19
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaceR View Post
In general I would say a RWD have more room to work with considering it is easier to adjust the balance. But since you have more room to work with its harder to drive on the limit. But when you do its so much more rewarding.
A FWD/AWD is for the average person easier to drive faster. It is easier to utilize most of the grip. But less fun and generally less work.
Many people find less work and just going fast to be more rewarding without having to balance the car that much.
im not so sure i agree with that. cars like the frs and the miata are easy to drive and thats the reason why spec miata is more popular than spec focus. with these cars that are balanced is is more dangerous to drive at the limits but many inexperienced drivers in fwd cars just drive too hot and end up pushing off so much speed without learning the lesson.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 06:09 PM   #20
muffinman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: -
Location: jerz
Posts: 120
Thanks: 55
Thanked 25 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRiSson View Post
Not impressed with carbon fiber. As a structural material, sure it has a lot going for it. As an aesthetic material - not impressed at all.
whhhattt? im curious as to what kind of carbon fiber applications u have seen. the high quality stuff is beautiful i.e pagani & lambo superleggera.
muffinman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 09:47 PM   #21
FRiSson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: FR-S MT
Location: New England
Posts: 1,081
Thanks: 118
Thanked 483 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by muffinman View Post
whhhattt? im curious as to what kind of carbon fiber applications u have seen. the high quality stuff is beautiful i.e pagani & lambo superleggera.
As I said, it is an impressive structural material, as in the examples you cited. I just don't much like the look of exposed carbon fiber as trim pieces.
FRiSson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 07:30 AM   #22
muffinman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: -
Location: jerz
Posts: 120
Thanks: 55
Thanked 25 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRiSson View Post
As I said, it is an impressive structural material, as in the examples you cited. I just don't much like the look of exposed carbon fiber as trim pieces.
you would be in the minority then.
muffinman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 08:49 AM   #23
CaptainSlow
Senior Member
 
CaptainSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 799
Thanks: 392
Thanked 388 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Let's say the car is 2800lbs, and is a perfect 50:50 split. That means that there's 1400lbs in front, and 1400lbs in back. That means every 50lbs you take out of 1 side will increase that ratio by 1 point to the other side. For example, if you take out 50lbs from the exhaust at the rear, you change the balance to 51:49 F:R

Math:

1400 (rear) - 50 (weight reduction) = 1350 (new rear)

1400 (front) + 1350 (new rear) = 2750 (new total)

1350 (new rear) / 2750 (new total) = 49%
__________________
Ultramarine 2013 Scion FR-S 6MT
CaptainSlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 10:07 AM   #24
Atticus808
Senior Member
 
Atticus808's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Splash Mountain
Location: Disneyland
Posts: 1,057
Thanks: 940
Thanked 2,337 Times in 918 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainSlow View Post
Let's say the car is 2800lbs, and is a perfect 50:50 split. That means that there's 1400lbs in front, and 1400lbs in back. That means every 50lbs you take out of 1 side will increase that ratio by 1 point to the other side. For example, if you take out 50lbs from the exhaust at the rear, you change the balance to 51:49 F:R

Math:

1400 (rear) - 50 (weight reduction) = 1350 (new rear)

1400 (front) + 1350 (new rear) = 2750 (new total)

1350 (new rear) / 2750 (new total) = 49%
true to an extent.
based on what I learned in school, the shape of the peices play a big part. I forgot the formulas but it gets a little
complicated. your COG can get put to the left or right side too.
Atticus808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 10:30 AM   #25
CaptainSlow
Senior Member
 
CaptainSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 799
Thanks: 392
Thanked 388 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Right, I was just trying to make it as simple as possible. Basically, any MINOR change will have next to no effect...nothing that any normal driver would ever be able to tell. You'd have to start shifting hundreds of pounds for it to become really noticeable
__________________
Ultramarine 2013 Scion FR-S 6MT
CaptainSlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 11:49 AM   #26
root
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Raven FR-S
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 268
Thanks: 4
Thanked 80 Times in 53 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
OP, do you have anything like SCCA solo II autocross in your area? Great way to learn. You can read all this theory, you need to experience it to truly know.
And then you'll be able to start feeling what difference mods you make do.
root is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More on the CG and balance... Carban Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 0 09-28-2012 07:07 PM
Wheel Size vs. Balance jellygorilla Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 6 09-11-2012 01:23 PM
Best wheel and tire size without upsetting balance ngabdala Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 0 09-11-2012 12:27 PM
Subwoofer placement and car balance denverizzles Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 8 09-05-2012 10:10 PM
Will FI Ruin the Balance of FRS/BRZ? ZmZMWagon Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 8 04-12-2012 11:19 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.