![]() |
Cars balance
just wondering, if you do minor mods like changing the exhaust or adding carbon fibre bits, would that throw the balance of the car off quite a bit?
I remember doing centre of gravity calculations in school, and it can change it a lot, so I just want to see what everyone else thinks. also, beginner rwd question. I've only had a bit of seat time in a 335i and c63 AMG, so I'm not too familiar with rwd since I daily drive a fwd. I understand that the frs and brz have amazing handling and balance, but what happens if you accelerate in a turn? wouldn't the back end always come loose? |
Not impressed with carbon fiber. As a structural material, sure it has a lot going for it. As an aesthetic material - not impressed at all.
|
Quote:
|
The balance front to rear is typical RWD balance 55/45.
|
I think the balance will depend on how much weight and your intended purpose for the car. If you just do spirited driving on backroads you may not notice anything. However, if you're a seasoned vet at the track, there may be a bigger difference.
I wouldn't be too concerned with minor weight differences here and there. Things may change when you start removing seats and other hefty items. |
Honestly, if you enter a corner quickly a bigger danger to the rear is letting off the gas entirely than it is adding gas (to a certain extent of course). As long as you aren't way too fast to begin with, you'll actually feel the car hunker down as you power through the bend.
That's in this car. Now in something high-powered you do need to be more careful. You don't want to just step on the gas. |
Quote:
when I drove the c63 I didn't really experiment cause I didn't want to hit a curb. what is the reason that so many new rwd drivers lose control? |
Quote:
Quote:
But as you say. Adding weight to the rear will generally result in more oversteer, in theory. Most people will not be able feel the difference between full and near emty tank. Im not able to feel the difference in a normal (FR) car. The differences are subtle. Some may be able to feel the difference in balance better than others tough. But if you are on the road you normally would not push the car to notice the difference. On the track you usually want to keep weight low by only having about a quarter tank of fuel. So balance would not shift much there either. Quote:
Don't fully disable driving aids if you don't really know how the car will behave when going above the limits. Take it do the track. You could also find a big empty abandoned parking space and learn how the car handles in different conditions (dry and wet) without ESP on before going to a track. Then you could have a bit better starting point when going to a track. And remember, handling in the wet is very different to handling in dry conditions. |
Quote:
I honestly don't know if I should laugh or cry.. |
It's pretty simple really. Overdrive this car and you back into whatever you're gonna hit. Overdrive your FWD car and you head on whatever you're gonna hit.
RWD cars are metric asstons more fun to drive. You have to learn to drive with the throttle as much as the steering wheel. FWD you drive with the brake and the wheel. Enjoy |
you can feel the back end come out anyway, its got progressive break of traction
|
Quote:
in my limited experience with rwd cars, I've never been in a oversteer situation cause I was just test driving. I guess I am just wondering why all reviews say the handling is amazing, when I would assume awd would be better (no im not saying this car should be a awd car). as mentioned above, the car gets more planted when turning, I never knew that. I need to experiment |
Quote:
Unfortunately AWD usually results in understeer. I used to own an STI hatch and even with 3 limited slip differentials (F,R,C) when you applied power out of a turn, you would get power-on understeer. Pretty annoying. Basically tires have a limited amount of grip and asking the front tires to turn the car AND pull the car through a turn will result in the front tires losing grip before the rears (i.e., understeer). AWD will also add about 200-300 lbs of additional weight, and in most cars, in a front-heavy weight distribution. The only AWD car I've driven that handles fairly neutral is the Evo X, which uses a torque-vectoring differential in the rear to overcome the chassis' inherent understeer. Feels a bit artificial like the rear end is coming out, but very effective. To your original q about the FR-S about when the back end comes loose under power, that depends how close you are to the limit of your grip in a turn. The closer you are to that limit (i.e., near maximum speed you can hold in a turn), the easier it is for the rear end to come out under power. The further you are from that limit (i.e., going slower in a turn), the more power you would need to apply to break the rear end loose. One thing that might help you visualize this is the concept of the traction circle: http://www.autospies.com/images/user...tioncircle.jpg If you're already near the limit of traction in a turn (i.e., 3:00 position in a right-handed turn), the less grip you have for acceleration. Applying power at that point would break the rear end loose. But if you're well within the traction circle, the more power you can apply without breaking traction (e.g., 1:00 position in a right-handed turn). |
nice diagrams, now go find a big wet parking lot and jerk the wheel and jam the throttle. It's 90% feel, and 10% knowing what's going to happen. Go learn the "feel" :P
-Rich H. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.