|
||||||
| Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 | ||
|
"New hotness"
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: WRB Limited MT BRZ
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 480
Thanks: 186
Thanked 290 Times in 116 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
As others have mentioned, FWD typically understeer or "push" through corners with the nose of the vehicle pushing wide through turns. AWD also usually do this because of what I said in the earlier paragraph, as well as the fact that most AWD systems are based on a FWD layout. The beauty of RWD is that they tend to oversteer, where the rear of the vehicle will tend to swing wide. ***Caveat: there are MANY factors beyond FWD/RWD that affect over/understeer characteristics, these are generalizations.*** The tendency to oversteer can help the RWD drive car to steer through a turn by applying a bit more throttle, to break the back loose a bit and turn the car a bit more. As another poster mentioned, a common mistake people new to RWD make is letting off the throttle in a turn. This can be very bad. This induces "throttle-off-oversteer" in which the rear suspension becomes unloaded (weight is transferred forward) and the rear of the car looses grip. This typically induces a catastrophic spin. Other factors: tire grip, road surface, weight balance (FWD tends to be front heavy, RWD tends to have a better distribution), camber, caster, mechanical and pneumatic trail, suspension type, roll center, c.o.g., etc!!!
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to JonnyRocket For This Useful Post: | Atticus808 (11-18-2012) |
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Splash Mountain
Location: Disneyland
Posts: 1,057
Thanks: 940
Thanked 2,337 Times in 918 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
|
great replies! thanks a lot
now I understand rwd way more (in theory) just have to go get this car now! and correct me if I'm wrong. from the comments I gather, it seems as though rwd cars have A LOT more room to work with in a turn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2010 Cooper S, 74 Beetle
Location: Norway
Posts: 726
Thanks: 239
Thanked 252 Times in 124 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
|
Quote:
A FWD/AWD is for the average person easier to drive faster. It is easier to utilize most of the grip. But less fun and generally less work. Many people find less work and just going fast to be more rewarding without having to balance the car that much. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to RaceR For This Useful Post: | Atticus808 (11-18-2012) |
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: several
Location: norcal
Posts: 903
Thanks: 421
Thanked 286 Times in 223 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
|
That's not an unreasonable way to look at it. In FWD the car is being pulled by the front wheels, whereas in RWD it's being pushed by the rears. The reason you spin if you decelerate rapidly in a turn (this can be by braking or simply by lifting off the throttle) is that the deceleration causes the mass of the car to be thrown forward (picture what happens to occupants and loose objects inside the car, well the same thing happens to the car itself; animators often way exaggerate the effect so picturing a cartoon car coming to an abrupt stop gives you a good idea of how it works). When this happens, the traction wheels (rears) lose traction and swing around. Conversely, if you accelerate in a turn, mass goes to the rears and away from the steering wheels so they lose grip and the car straightens out. If you go to a car control clinic or other event where a skidpad is available, you can try this out for yourself.
__________________
Asphalt FR-S MT (future)
'05 Hyundai Accent; '01 BMW M Coupe; '01 BMW M Roadster (for sale); '99 BMW Z3 Coupe 2.8l (for sale) "Simplicate and add lightness." - Gordon Hooton |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to einzlr For This Useful Post: | Atticus808 (11-18-2012) |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: -
Location: jerz
Posts: 120
Thanks: 55
Thanked 25 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
|
whhhattt? im curious as to what kind of carbon fiber applications u have seen. the high quality stuff is beautiful i.e pagani & lambo superleggera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: FR-S MT
Location: New England
Posts: 1,081
Thanks: 118
Thanked 483 Times in 241 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
|
As I said, it is an impressive structural material, as in the examples you cited. I just don't much like the look of exposed carbon fiber as trim pieces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: -
Location: jerz
Posts: 120
Thanks: 55
Thanked 25 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 799
Thanks: 392
Thanked 388 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
|
Let's say the car is 2800lbs, and is a perfect 50:50 split. That means that there's 1400lbs in front, and 1400lbs in back. That means every 50lbs you take out of 1 side will increase that ratio by 1 point to the other side. For example, if you take out 50lbs from the exhaust at the rear, you change the balance to 51:49 F:R
Math: 1400 (rear) - 50 (weight reduction) = 1350 (new rear) 1400 (front) + 1350 (new rear) = 2750 (new total) 1350 (new rear) / 2750 (new total) = 49%
__________________
Ultramarine 2013 Scion FR-S 6MT
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Splash Mountain
Location: Disneyland
Posts: 1,057
Thanks: 940
Thanked 2,337 Times in 918 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
|
Quote:
based on what I learned in school, the shape of the peices play a big part. I forgot the formulas but it gets a little complicated. your COG can get put to the left or right side too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 799
Thanks: 392
Thanked 388 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
|
Right, I was just trying to make it as simple as possible. Basically, any MINOR change will have next to no effect...nothing that any normal driver would ever be able to tell. You'd have to start shifting hundreds of pounds for it to become really noticeable
__________________
Ultramarine 2013 Scion FR-S 6MT
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: Raven FR-S
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 268
Thanks: 4
Thanked 80 Times in 53 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
OP, do you have anything like SCCA solo II autocross in your area? Great way to learn. You can read all this theory, you need to experience it to truly know.
And then you'll be able to start feeling what difference mods you make do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| More on the CG and balance... | Carban | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 0 | 09-28-2012 07:07 PM |
| Wheel Size vs. Balance | jellygorilla | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 6 | 09-11-2012 01:23 PM |
| Best wheel and tire size without upsetting balance | ngabdala | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 0 | 09-11-2012 12:27 PM |
| Subwoofer placement and car balance | denverizzles | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 8 | 09-05-2012 10:10 PM |
| Will FI Ruin the Balance of FRS/BRZ? | ZmZMWagon | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 8 | 04-12-2012 11:19 PM |