follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

View Poll Results: Which engine layout would you prefer the FT-86 to use?
Naturally Aspirated 2.0L 33 36.67%
Turbocharged 2.0L 42 46.67%
small block 6 cylinder(flat or V)<3.0L 9 10.00%
2.5L 4 banger option 6 6.67%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2011, 11:30 PM   #43
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Subaru guys on NASIOC are talking about how the engine placement in the FT86 makes Subaru's conventional 'behind and to the right' turbo placement a no-go.

That being said, still no news on the new WRX/STI motor and how its turbo will be mounted.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 11:47 PM   #44
WingsofWar
MODERATOR-SAMA
 
WingsofWar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Swagtron Scooter
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 345
Thanked 1,562 Times in 524 Posts
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
Subaru guys on NASIOC are talking about how the engine placement in the FT86 makes Subaru's conventional 'behind and to the right' turbo placement a no-go.

That being said, still no news on the new WRX/STI motor and how its turbo will be mounted.
yeah i can see that..if the engine sits low and close to the firewall..no room for turbo without moving at the very least the engine forward.

Although a supercharger option sounds enticing...and give it a retarded Toyota engine designation like... D4F-ZTE
__________________
WingsofWar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 12:13 AM   #45
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by WingsofWar View Post
yeah i can see that..if the engine sits low and close to the firewall..no room for turbo without moving at the very least the engine forward.

Although a supercharger option sounds enticing...and give it a retarded Toyota engine designation like... D4F-ZTE
On one of the turbo Legacy versions they do run the piping forward. But space may be an issue with this car.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 01:44 AM   #46
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
This poll is bogus. There's no 200hp 1.8 L4 n/a option to vote on.
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 07:02 AM   #47
[es vi: eks]
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: Subaru Legacy
Location: NZ, Christchurch, The Shakey Isles
Posts: 322
Thanks: 41
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
On one of the turbo Legacy versions they do run the piping forward. But space may be an issue with this car.
That would be interesting to find out were you could make a turbo work on the FT?
Maybe two wee turbos right under the heads were the exhaust ports come out?
__________________
I'm sick of these mother f***ing earthquakes on these mother f***ing plains.
[es vi: eks] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 09:05 AM   #48
bofa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Ms. Daisy
Location: Dog house
Posts: 645
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by [es vi: eks] View Post
That would be interesting to find out were you could make a turbo work on the FT?
Maybe two wee turbos right under the heads were the exhaust ports come out?
If not, there's always the turbo muffler option.

__________________
BRZ before hoes
bofa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 09:14 AM   #49
Random_Art
professional smartass
 
Random_Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: 16 speed mountain bike...
Location: Georgia
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I hope those were ebay turbos... Something that pointless would be a waste of a real quality turbo.
__________________

Goodbye Celica, you served me well.

http://artsofrandomness.blogspot.com/
Random_Art is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 12:20 PM   #50
MtnDrvr86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2002 honda civic ex
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 337
Thanks: 30
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Looks like they tried to make their own version of this rear mounted turbo system. haha http://www.ststurbo.com/
MtnDrvr86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 12:54 PM   #51
bofa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Ms. Daisy
Location: Dog house
Posts: 645
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnDrvr86 View Post
Looks like they tried to make their own version of this rear mounted turbo system. haha http://www.ststurbo.com/
Those are pretty interesting. I did some searching and found quite a few people that swear by them and had decent gains. I found a few 350Z and Camaro videos on youtube too.
__________________
BRZ before hoes
bofa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 01:53 PM   #52
PAImportTuner
Turbo Mafia Presidente
 
PAImportTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: U Mad?
Location: East Coast US
Posts: 526
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar View Post
lol. The turbo loving here just shows how this forum has changed, not how likely Subaru will use a turbo engine .

If that is what you want why did you vote 2.0T?

Edit: Sheesh why does the poll say flat or v? I thought I was careful not to put that into the poll, dagnabbit!
Because a 2.0T performance would be the easiest for the everyone power and mpg wise, so I could live with it.

All I want is a non-obnoxious, streetable 230-250RWHP. I don't care how it's done really. All I know is that the 2.0 N/A won't do it without losing it's daily drive-ability or being crazy loud, so it doesn't get my vote.
__________________
"the FR-S is going to have to give me a blowjob every time I touch the steering wheel if all it can make me smile with is the handling." - Maxim
PAImportTuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 02:02 PM   #53
PAImportTuner
Turbo Mafia Presidente
 
PAImportTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: U Mad?
Location: East Coast US
Posts: 526
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
On one of the turbo Legacy versions they do run the piping forward. But space may be an issue with this car.
Correct the new 10/11 Legacy GTs run the turbo forward, getting rid of the boxer rumble(thank god).

It's very easy and possible for the FT to go turbo, you can see it does not extend beyond the engine, maybe just a bit.




__________________
"the FR-S is going to have to give me a blowjob every time I touch the steering wheel if all it can make me smile with is the handling." - Maxim
PAImportTuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 02:32 PM   #54
WingsofWar
MODERATOR-SAMA
 
WingsofWar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Swagtron Scooter
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 345
Thanked 1,562 Times in 524 Posts
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAImportTuner View Post
Correct the new 10/11 Legacy GTs run the turbo forward, getting rid of the boxer rumble(thank god).

It's very easy and possible for the FT to go turbo, you can see it does not extend beyond the engine, maybe just a bit.
That would definitely fix the horizontal issue having it forward so it wont hit the firewall. But what about the lateral?

The 10/11 Legacy GTs are pretty tall and large cars. and that sub frame height lengthens the total engine compartment. You think with the smaller FT86's engine being lowslung might have clearance issues with putting the turbo and piping directly below the engine? How close will the engine sit to the engine cradle and subframe? and will that have a major effect on the implementation of a turbo as well?

Maybe raising the engine up? or the car up? would that change the COG balance?
__________________

Last edited by WingsofWar; 06-24-2011 at 03:04 PM.
WingsofWar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 01:56 AM   #55
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by WingsofWar View Post

Maybe raising the engine up? or the car up? would that change the COG balance?
yes, but to the large portion of the lewlzturbo crowd, neutral balance and low CoG mean jack squat. Err, wait, they couldn't slam their car's completely negating their suspension's use if you would have to raise it...hrrmm....quite a conundrum.
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2011, 02:02 AM   #56
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAImportTuner View Post

All I want is a non-obnoxious, streetable 230-250RWHP. I don't care how it's done really. All I know is that the 2.0 N/A won't do it without losing it's daily drive-ability or being crazy loud, so it doesn't get my vote.
Here, I found you a new avatar:
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FT-86 / FR-S engine will be Toyota 2l turbo!! Slide Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 114 07-07-2011 11:58 PM
Do you want a turbo engine for the FT-86? Read here Ramo BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 86 06-23-2011 09:39 PM
Geneva Preview: Techart to debut 911 Turbo, Turbo S vh_supra26 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 1 02-22-2010 06:20 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.