follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-10-2017, 09:22 PM   #57
Tokay444
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,752
Thanks: 938
Thanked 1,024 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kicknwing View Post
i mean they have only been used in cars both street and track for years. So i see no reason why they wont work on here. also don't see why greddy and sard would invest thousands on r&d for something that wont work. they would never see there return
Sure, but this is one the best, most even flowing factory manifolds I’ve ever flow benched.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2017, 11:33 PM   #58
Kicknwing
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 2014 frs
Location: Virgina
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
Sure, but this is one the best, most even flowing factory manifolds I’ve ever flow benched.
but that doesn't mean it cant still be improved upon. its still not out to the general public. i do know that greddy has been testing there's on ken gushi's street car.
Kicknwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2017, 07:11 AM   #59
chaoskaze
The Fail Boat
 
chaoskaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: CWP S.B.
Location: LasVegas
Posts: 3,028
Thanks: 4,720
Thanked 1,294 Times in 874 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What kind Apples to oranges are you talking about to ruin a thread?

Why is ITB on NA cars a strange things? tell that to BMWs?

IT's just good for some ppl's build, FI or not.



Not everything is about right or wrong, this is not stupid politics, just drop it.
chaoskaze is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chaoskaze For This Useful Post:
venturaII (11-11-2017)
Old 11-11-2017, 07:46 AM   #60
Spawn_Of_Creation
Human
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2015 BRZ Black
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 208
Thanks: 105
Thanked 102 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Is it weird i keep coming back to this thread just to see how much this argument has progressed?
__________________
"Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done, and why. Then do it." - The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
Spawn_Of_Creation is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Spawn_Of_Creation For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (11-11-2017), JazzleSAURUS (11-13-2017), meWant (11-12-2017), Williampreza (11-11-2017), wparsons (11-15-2017)
Old 11-11-2017, 03:00 PM   #61
Tokay444
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,752
Thanks: 938
Thanked 1,024 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaoskaze View Post
What kind Apples to oranges are you talking about to ruin a thread?

Why is ITB on NA cars a strange things? tell that to BMWs?

IT's just good for some ppl's build, FI or not.



Not everything is about right or wrong, this is not stupid politics, just drop it.
No one said it was wrong.
Comparing two completely different engines, one with boost and one NA, as some type of justification is stupid.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2017, 05:03 PM   #62
gtengr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 655
Thanks: 326
Thanked 258 Times in 177 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Why all the focus on ITB's when a plenum is being added? That and the new runners will have a bigger effect on power.
gtengr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2017, 05:34 PM   #63
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 888
Thanked 1,078 Times in 681 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
BMW obviously doesn't know what they're doing by putting ITBs on hugely successful STREET motors like the S14, M88/S38, S50, S54, S62, S85, etc. Or Ford with any of their Cosworth offerings. Or is the argument now simply going to be that a forced induction motor was referenced earlier? I seriously doubt the RB26 was referenced as a comparable motor to the FA20; only that ITBs were quite successfully used on it as a road-going motor. If that's the case, then there's really no point comparing ANY motor with another unless they are 100% identical, which is really pretty pointless.
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule

Last edited by venturaII; 11-11-2017 at 05:52 PM.
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2017, 05:45 PM   #64
Tokay444
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,752
Thanks: 938
Thanked 1,024 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturaII View Post
BMW obviously doesn't know what they're doing by putting ITBs on hugely successful STREET motors like the S14, M88/S38, S50, S54, S62, S85, etc. Or is the argument now simply going to be that a forced induction motor was referenced earlier? I seriously doubt the RB26 was referenced as a comparable motor to the FA20; only that ITBs were quite successfully used on it as a road-going motor. If that's the case, then there's really no point comparing ANY motor with another unless they are 100% identical, which is really pretty pointless.
Do you have data on ANY of the mentioned motors, WITHOUT ITBs?
Make an apples to apples comparison or don’t bother.
Post some gains made on an NA Honda from going ITB. That could actually be useful info.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2017, 05:47 PM   #65
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 888
Thanked 1,078 Times in 681 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
Do you have data on ANY of the mentioned motors, WITHOUT ITBs?

I bet BMW and Ford have plenty. Are you suggesting that removing the ITBs and going with a single TB would have no effect on power output or delivery? Or even more absurd, would IMPROVE either?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
Post some gains made on an NA Honda from going ITB. That could actually be useful info.
I'm sure that data is readily available (in fact, you can't Google 'Honda' and 'ITB' and not find tons of info), but then we'd be comparing apples to oranges, according to you...
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule

Last edited by venturaII; 11-11-2017 at 06:05 PM.
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to venturaII For This Useful Post:
JazzleSAURUS (11-13-2017)
Old 11-11-2017, 05:49 PM   #66
Tokay444
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,752
Thanks: 938
Thanked 1,024 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Edited.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2017, 08:00 PM   #67
x808drifter
LMGTFY
 
x808drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 13 FRS, 91 Miata
Location: Lava Town, HI
Posts: 2,776
Thanks: 5,561
Thanked 3,650 Times in 1,625 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturaII View Post
BMW obviously doesn't know what they're doing by putting ITBs on hugely successful STREET motors like the S14, M88/S38, S50, S54, S62, S85, etc. Or Ford with any of their Cosworth offerings. Or is the argument now simply going to be that a forced induction motor was referenced earlier? I seriously doubt the RB26 was referenced as a comparable motor to the FA20; only that ITBs were quite successfully used on it as a road-going motor. If that's the case, then there's really no point comparing ANY motor with another unless they are 100% identical, which is really pretty pointless.
That is EXACTLY what started the argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spawn_Of_Creation View Post
If there are gains to be had, it would be in the 8500+ rev range where the stock plenum has restrictions.
Tell that to Nissan, who put this type of system on the R32-34 Skyline GT-R as a factory design with a rev limit of 7500, same as our engines.
.
x808drifter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to x808drifter For This Useful Post:
Tokay444 (11-11-2017)
Old 11-11-2017, 08:20 PM   #68
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 888
Thanked 1,078 Times in 681 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by x808drifter View Post
That is EXACTLY what started the argument.
Only in that the RB26 operates in the same rpm range as ours, meaning ITBs are not some sort of component reserved for super high rpm motors. Likewise, the M88/S38 motors only make peak power in the mid 6000rpm range, but still use ITBs.
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2017, 09:00 PM   #69
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Typical ITB results on a NA S2000.

CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Gadzooks (01-24-2018), JazzleSAURUS (11-13-2017), Teseo (11-11-2017), Tokay444 (11-11-2017)
Old 11-11-2017, 09:44 PM   #70
Tokay444
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,752
Thanks: 938
Thanked 1,024 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Typical ITB results on a NA S2000.

Can we see the rest of the build? I have a had time swallowing a 45hp gain on an already strung out S2000.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Part throttle faster than full throttle brn12345 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 38 10-21-2021 01:20 PM
SARD CF Intake Pipe, SARD Oil Catch Can, TRD Oil Cap, Rad Cap, Battery Clamp Trojan_SC Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 19 03-28-2018 08:52 PM
Bad news good news ls1ac BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 2 10-01-2016 10:11 PM
SARD 86 GT1 Body Kit + SARD LSR Wing nigel-jdmparts Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 1 04-27-2015 01:41 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.