|
||||||
| BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: '14 Monogram, '95 Miata, '90 300ZX
Location: VA
Posts: 378
Thanks: 499
Thanked 253 Times in 144 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Porsche makes them all the time. Quote:
Hyundai and Kia are leaving absolutely nobody in the dust, with the single possible exception of FCA vehicles. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
pessimistic skeptic
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: '14 FR-S Monogram AT JRSC
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,786
Thanks: 1,713
Thanked 1,054 Times in 694 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mrg666 For This Useful Post: | ~el~jefe~ (10-26-2017) |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: 2019 MX-5 RF
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 601
Thanks: 829
Thanked 241 Times in 153 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
honda is a pile of crap now. Really is. Buick is better. $12,000 dollar KIA is a better buy. I dont even trust that honda is truly that high on the list either. They have a wide swing of reliability between models. It should be more scientifically weighted, with wide swings causing a company to be dropped down more. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ~el~jefe~ For This Useful Post: | mrg666 (10-26-2017) |
|
|
#18 | |
|
pessimistic skeptic
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: '14 FR-S Monogram AT JRSC
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,786
Thanks: 1,713
Thanked 1,054 Times in 694 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Drives: '14 Monogram, '95 Miata, '90 300ZX
Location: VA
Posts: 378
Thanks: 499
Thanked 253 Times in 144 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Yes I do. Those studies from a year or two ago don't tell you jack about reliability. Most new cars are perfectly fine for at least a few years. Even on the ones that aren't, most things that break are pretty trivial. You need about a decade of solid evidence before you really know if you have bought something of quality or not. Go back a decade or so and the Hyundais/Kias were garbage. Therefore, they may or may not be good now but there is no meaningful proof to the contrary at this point. Based on their history of being crap, they don't deserve the benefit of the doubt until they prove themselves. I will give them that their warranty is very long. Whether or not they're any good at honoring claims, I have no idea. Quote:
They don't have any problem, problems either. The fact that they make boring cars now and that they have bought into marketing garbage CVTs just like everyone else doesn't make them any worse than any other company. Their cars are still very reliable. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Reformed
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '23 GRC, '11 Prius, '04 RAV4
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 1,258
Thanked 1,152 Times in 596 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
funny how everyone is getting so worked up about where each brand falls in the rankings....folks, fact is this ain't the 80s, 90s or even 2000s anymore. it isn't cool anymore to talk trash about kia/hyundai. nearly every single brand to some degree uses common parts that other manufacturers use in virtually every single model. japanese models use korean parts, euro models use japanese parts, etc. the differences in number of problems is grasping at straws at this point.
you almost cannot buy a "bad" car these days, only the "wrong" car. for the past decade, the main points of contention people submit to consumer reports have been mainly related to infotainment & transmission issues which makes sense considering each brand has their own proprietary headunit system and adjusts the trans they get supplied for their needs.. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to HKz For This Useful Post: | Darth Khan (10-27-2017) |
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: S2000
Location: Maryland
Posts: 63
Thanks: 3
Thanked 22 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I imagine going on forward, most issues will be about the electrical/sensors/firmware side, less so mechanical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ 6MT
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,026
Thanks: 919
Thanked 609 Times in 391 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I'd go the other way with this. Many cars in the 90s and 2000s had terrible electrical gremlins but were mechanically solid, mostly as a result of adding additional computers and entertainment systems to the cars in those days. Now that manufacturers have all learned their lessons, electrical issues are now quite rare but they keep adding hardware like new sensors, turbos, catalysts and injectors that add mechanical failure points. I expect into the 2020s, mechanical failures will continue to rise while electrical issues will stay quite low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ Limited
Location: USA
Posts: 4,046
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 5,620 Times in 2,267 Posts
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
![]() That car right there is very simple. I don't think there's a single part on it that wouldn't fail. Although design and engineering deficiencies are a factor, reliability usually comes down to build quality, materials quality and tolerances in the manufacturing processes. A complicated machine built in a modern Japanese factory (or practically any first world factory) is almost always going to be more reliable than a very simple machine built in a British Leyland factory or even a modern machine built in a Tata factory. That's because the quality improvement processes have been distilled down to extremely low failure rates through Kaizen and Six Sigma and their derivative approaches, and for years they've been figuring out how to weed out the errors. I have a feeling the reliability of our cars relies in large part on the fact that it has the eyes of two different corporate management teams on it. Subaru doesn't want to lose face dealing with Toyota, and Toyota doesn't want to lose face with Subaru. If either one dropped the ball, it would result in great dishonor. Lots of bowing and apologizing. Probably a suicide. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Badass Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 SWP BRZ Limited
Location: Near Detroit Zoo
Posts: 342
Thanks: 60
Thanked 68 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
CR is a joke.. and title is misleading. I did not see in the article they numbered the car from top to bottom 10. OP's post is misleading... but still my toothbrush makes more power and more reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
|
Reformed
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '23 GRC, '11 Prius, '04 RAV4
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 1,258
Thanked 1,152 Times in 596 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to HKz For This Useful Post: | Clutch (10-28-2017) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FR-S / BRZ Reliability Low (Consumer Reports) | MJ_Redondo | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 28 | 03-16-2014 03:18 AM |
| Consumer Reports | White64Goat | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 0 | 09-28-2013 09:04 PM |
| Consumer Reports | TRD-X | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 2 | 05-06-2013 06:55 PM |
| Consumer Reports: BRZ review | poormans_LFA | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 29 | 04-19-2012 09:02 PM |
| Consumer Reports FR-S and BRZ weight | schlomo | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 29 | 03-02-2012 04:15 PM |