follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-24-2016, 02:40 PM   #15
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tracerit View Post
I just wish there were more sound clips of the exhaust with a stock exhaust. Aside from my powertrain warranty ending in 15 months, that's the only thing holding me back. I'm a big stickler for sound, not looking for something obnoxious like most UEL's. Pretty sure the CS400 will sound good, but I just need to get a better feel for it.
Not gonna lie. No cats on a stock muffler will sound like crap, because the muffler will rattle.

Goes for any catless header.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
funwheeldrive (10-24-2016), tracerit (10-24-2016)
Old 10-24-2016, 02:40 PM   #16
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Do you have any before dynos? Even just a baseline with the supercharger and then supercharger and header would be phenomenal. Also, I'd love to see what that torque curve looks like with that combination.
It's at Church; the before dynos are the same as any other FRS/BRZ tuned there, there are hundreds of dynos scattered throughout the forums. A CARB JRSC should put down approximately 245-255whp on ACN91.

Here's the CSG BRZ on HBP (9% more boost), and a A/350 (non-ceramic) on E70.

Not shown: CSG BRZ on HBP and A/350 (non-ceramic) on ACN91 puts down approximately 335whp.



For reference, here's a stock 2105 ACN91 vs A/350 ACN91 vs A/350 E70



and my 2017, stock, on VP101


Last edited by CSG Mike; 10-24-2016 at 02:51 PM.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
funwheeldrive (10-24-2016), MaximeT (10-24-2016), ThatAsianBradah (06-19-2017), wparsons (10-24-2016)
Old 10-24-2016, 02:51 PM   #17
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
It's at Church; the before dynos are the same as any other FRS/BRZ tuned there, there are hundreds of dynos scattered throughout the forums.

Here's the CSG BRZ on HBP (9% more boost), and a A/350 (non-ceramic) on E70.



For reference, here's a stock 2105 ACN91 vs A/350 ACN91 vs A/350 E70



and my 2017, stock, on VP101


Thanks Mike.

I'm especially interested in seeing what the torque curve looks like with a CS 400, the JRSC with stock pulley or E-Force with stock pulley, and 91 octane gas.

Actually, I'd love to see a comparison with both superchargers, but that's probably asking a bit much.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 03:25 PM   #18
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Not gonna lie. No cats on a stock muffler will sound like crap, because the muffler will rattle.

Goes for any catless header.
I'm running the stock exhaust system with just the CS400. There's some very minor rattle, but it seems the OEM resonator and second cat are enough to tame things down.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post:
tracerit (10-24-2016)
Old 10-24-2016, 03:45 PM   #19
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
I'm running the stock exhaust system with just the CS400. There's some very minor rattle, but it seems the OEM resonator and second cat are enough to tame things down.
With the OEM front pipe, the rattle is tamed down; you should try a catless front and you'll barf at the noise.

Seriously. But that's what prompted development of some catback options
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
Calum (10-24-2016), funwheeldrive (10-24-2016)
Old 10-24-2016, 03:46 PM   #20
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Thanks Mike.

I'm especially interested in seeing what the torque curve looks like with a CS 400, the JRSC with stock pulley or E-Force with stock pulley, and 91 octane gas.

Actually, I'd love to see a comparison with both superchargers, but that's probably asking a bit much.
Nobody locally has that combo; everyone here goes 350 after seeing the results =\
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 04:09 PM   #21
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Nobody locally has that combo; everyone here goes 350 after seeing the results =\
Yeah, I'm gathering that. I was under the impression that the top end difference was minimal between the 400 and the 350, and considering the price difference and that I spend very little time in the very upper ranges of the rpm band already, I thought the 400 was a good choice. I still think it is, for me, but it's hard to figure out what to set as my next goal.

I probably doesn't matter, really. With duty/taxes/shipping/exchange rate, an FI kit is pushing very close to $10K CAD. It'll be a while before I have that much cash just burning a hole in my pocket.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 04:13 PM   #22
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
With the OEM front pipe, the rattle is tamed down; you should try a catless front and you'll barf at the noise.

Seriously. But that's what prompted development of some catback options
Yeah, I heard one video. It was more than enough to tell me I don't want that setup.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 04:33 PM   #23
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Nobody locally has that combo; everyone here goes 350 after seeing the results =\


From what I've seen unless you're really wringing this motor out non stop the 400 seems to be a great compromise. Looks like the 400 gives a bit more down low torque but gives up just a little high rpm peak HP.


If it fits fine and is the "torque monster" it is marketed as, plus the lower price point.....


Is this not the case?
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 04:45 PM   #24
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summerwolf View Post
From what I've seen unless you're really wringing this motor out non stop the 400 seems to be a great compromise. Looks like the 400 gives a bit more down low torque but gives up just a little high rpm peak HP.


If it fits fine and is the "torque monster" it is marketed as, plus the lower price point.....


Is this not the case?
It really depends on what you're doing with the car. Some people are more comfortable redlining everywhere than others.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 05:22 PM   #25
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Mostly street driving, edelbrock SC, and some autoX mixed in.... although you have to redline the car to get performance out of it anyways.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
It really depends on what you're doing with the car. Some people are more comfortable redlining everywhere than others.
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 06:01 PM   #26
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summerwolf View Post
Mostly street driving, edelbrock SC, and some autoX mixed in.... although you have to redline the car to get performance out of it anyways.
That tells me you're better suited for the A/350. If you had said everything but that, then I'd say the CS/400 is a better match for you.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 12:45 AM   #27
Bobster
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: GT86 GTS
Location: Sydney
Posts: 94
Thanks: 13
Thanked 24 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks guys please post more.

I'm staying NA with CS400
Bobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 01:42 PM   #28
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverfox View Post


Results are in:
Edelbrock
Delicious Tuning D Box
ACE Header CS400
Stock FP
Tomei 60S
91
Stock injectors and Pump

254whp and 205 tq on the heart breaker dyno.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Huh!!!
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ace Header 4-2-1 CS400 Custom BRZEdit Tune Dyno Results JDM-dono Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 24 05-05-2016 04:54 PM
Shiv dyno day 2 in lewisville, OFT users custom dyno tunes malubawla Southwest 14 11-21-2015 01:53 PM
Dyno numbers list from Evasive Motorsports Meet/Dyno Fish Southern California 29 02-24-2013 03:16 AM
Dyno Compilation - dyno testing results and recommendations Illusive Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 82 02-08-2013 07:00 PM
Base line dyno figure (dynapak Hub dyno) gtauto AUSTRALIA 16 10-08-2012 08:06 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.