follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-03-2016, 11:55 AM   #15
VABeachBRZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Virginia
Posts: 169
Thanks: 34
Thanked 46 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
With that being said, going SC is the safe route when it comes to the motor. So to speak. Each one has their pros and cons.
VABeachBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 12:04 PM   #16
Ross
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 85 corolla gts
Location: Chesapeake , Va
Posts: 361
Thanks: 17
Thanked 177 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
I feel neither one is safer then the other. Both present their own issues. With that said I prefer turbo.
Ross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 12:18 PM   #17
Sleepless
Senior Member
 
Sleepless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 639
Thanks: 299
Thanked 392 Times in 229 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
For AX I'd want the throttle control of an SC.

Either way, it seems like 300HP is safest limit on a stock motor / drivetrain if you are going to beat on it in AX or road course.

I went with JRSC because it has the longest standing reliability in road course use and reliability and consistency (power) are most important to me. If I were into AX, I'd probably go with the Edelbrock SC. 300-350HP should be fairly easy since out of the box they are approx 280HP (more on a cool day).
__________________
Sleepless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 01:28 PM   #18
why?
Only happy when it rains.
 
why?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: series.blue
Location: Harnett county NC
Posts: 1,995
Thanks: 5,698
Thanked 1,265 Times in 750 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Are you going to always want more hp? Or do you want a nice boost and be fine with it? Honestly that is what matters. The SC is great for what it gives, but it is limited in how much power it can add, while a turbo you can easily keep upgrading and get ridiculous hp numbers.
why? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 02:06 PM   #19
Frs909
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: 2013 Turbo FR-S Java Pearl
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 116
Thanks: 29
Thanked 46 Times in 32 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Garage
I have a turbo frs and my buddy has a sc frs driven both. Can honestly say you cant go wrong with either choice. My buddy does more track racing, hence if thats what you plan to do, sc i feel would be the better route. Linear power feel, would be as close to stock with more power and better feel at the track. If daily driving, i would say turbo, reason being you dont have to be in boost ever if you dont want to be. Car will drive and act just like stock until you get on it and get in boost range. So just depends what you want man.
Frs909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 02:12 PM   #20
FRS Justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 994
Thanks: 693
Thanked 695 Times in 417 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
At your desired power levels I would go S/C.. Why put yourself though all the extra requirements to run a turbo...
__________________
Instagram FT86PROJECT9S
Facebook FT86PROJECT9S
710whp
FRS Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FRS Justin For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (08-03-2016)
Old 08-03-2016, 02:14 PM   #21
Sleepless
Senior Member
 
Sleepless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 639
Thanks: 299
Thanked 392 Times in 229 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by why? View Post
Are you going to always want more hp? Or do you want a nice boost and be fine with it? Honestly that is what matters. The SC is great for what it gives, but it is limited in how much power it can add, while a turbo you can easily keep upgrading and get ridiculous hp numbers.
I don't understand this since you can get bigger SC and/or small pulley combo so depending on the SC, it should be just as good at making lots of power as a turbo...

I think it really depends on the kit (turbo or SC). So then the choice comes down to how you like the power delivered. Big blast on turbo spool up or linear from an SC.
__________________
Sleepless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 02:21 PM   #22
VABeachBRZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Virginia
Posts: 169
Thanks: 34
Thanked 46 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
One could go with the JRSC c38 kit and throw a high boost pulley on it with e85 and yield great results. That's a good option I guess.

But requires upgrades fuel pump and injectors
VABeachBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 02:28 PM   #23
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VABeachBRZ View Post
Yeah but with the SC route comes less power. But a lot easier to go back to stock if need be.

But what gets me is, the price for SC and Turbo are really close. So why not go turbo and get more power?
Unless you're looking for something north of 600whp, the SC kits don't have any less potential.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
FRS Justin (08-03-2016)
Old 08-03-2016, 02:29 PM   #24
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VABeachBRZ View Post
One could go with the JRSC c38 kit and throw a high boost pulley on it with e85 and yield great results. That's a good option I guess.

But requires upgrades fuel pump and injectors
so would any similarly powered turbo setup.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 02:32 PM   #25
VABeachBRZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Virginia
Posts: 169
Thanks: 34
Thanked 46 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
so would any similarly powered turbo setup.
With what everyone is saying I may as well go with the c38 JRSC with the upgrade pulley. Especially since I like to autox
VABeachBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VABeachBRZ For This Useful Post:
Sleepless (08-04-2016)
Old 08-03-2016, 03:15 PM   #26
Summerwolf
Panda Trueno
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VABeachBRZ View Post
One could go with the JRSC c38 kit and throw a high boost pulley on it with e85 and yield great results. That's a good option I guess.

But requires upgrades fuel pump and injectors


Basically anything requires fuel pump and injectors. Don't expect to make reliable power without upgrading those pieces as well.
Summerwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 03:18 PM   #27
FRS Justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 994
Thanks: 693
Thanked 695 Times in 417 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VABeachBRZ View Post
With what everyone is saying I may as well go with the c38 JRSC with the upgrade pulley. Especially since I like to autox
CSG Mike has experience with about every F/I kit out there. I would call him and discuss your options, Mike can give you the pros and cons of what your looking to do. I would also consider a edelbrock s/c too.
__________________
Instagram FT86PROJECT9S
Facebook FT86PROJECT9S
710whp
FRS Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 10:31 PM   #28
blindfold
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: brz
Location: China/LA
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
is there an upper limit to JRSC kit's intercooler? On the HKS SC kit, the supplied intercooler is pretty small, so going higher than .6bar on the system with smaller pulley poses quite few obstacles with heat management. So far E85 is not a problem on HKS but on pure gasoline, not sure how well the results could be.

I believe superchargers on our platform creates a more balanced car over turbo-ed version, purely my opinion.
blindfold is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Having some troubles with OFT. Vroomin86 Software Tuning 15 06-01-2015 06:54 PM
Windows 8 OFT troubles Maboy_nelson Software Tuning 10 05-07-2015 06:22 AM
I'm new to turbo kits, and need help deciding what else to get in addition to a kit. richpow Forced Induction 30 08-22-2014 12:31 PM
Lug nut troubles Krait1 Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 3 07-14-2013 12:46 AM
iPod troubles mvhull Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 20 11-29-2012 07:01 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.