|
||||||
| Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Virginia
Posts: 169
Thanks: 34
Thanked 46 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
With that being said, going SC is the safe route when it comes to the motor. So to speak. Each one has their pros and cons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 85 corolla gts
Location: Chesapeake , Va
Posts: 361
Thanks: 17
Thanked 177 Times in 110 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
|
I feel neither one is safer then the other. Both present their own issues. With that said I prefer turbo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 639
Thanks: 299
Thanked 392 Times in 229 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
|
For AX I'd want the throttle control of an SC.
Either way, it seems like 300HP is safest limit on a stock motor / drivetrain if you are going to beat on it in AX or road course. I went with JRSC because it has the longest standing reliability in road course use and reliability and consistency (power) are most important to me. If I were into AX, I'd probably go with the Edelbrock SC. 300-350HP should be fairly easy since out of the box they are approx 280HP (more on a cool day).
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Only happy when it rains.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: series.blue
Location: Harnett county NC
Posts: 1,995
Thanks: 5,698
Thanked 1,265 Times in 750 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
|
Are you going to always want more hp? Or do you want a nice boost and be fine with it? Honestly that is what matters. The SC is great for what it gives, but it is limited in how much power it can add, while a turbo you can easily keep upgrading and get ridiculous hp numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: 2013 Turbo FR-S Java Pearl
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 116
Thanks: 29
Thanked 46 Times in 32 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
I have a turbo frs and my buddy has a sc frs driven both. Can honestly say you cant go wrong with either choice. My buddy does more track racing, hence if thats what you plan to do, sc i feel would be the better route. Linear power feel, would be as close to stock with more power and better feel at the track. If daily driving, i would say turbo, reason being you dont have to be in boost ever if you dont want to be. Car will drive and act just like stock until you get on it and get in boost range. So just depends what you want man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 994
Thanks: 693
Thanked 695 Times in 417 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
|
At your desired power levels I would go S/C.. Why put yourself though all the extra requirements to run a turbo...
__________________
Instagram FT86PROJECT9S
Facebook FT86PROJECT9S 710whp |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to FRS Justin For This Useful Post: | CSG Mike (08-03-2016) |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 BRZ
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 639
Thanks: 299
Thanked 392 Times in 229 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
|
Quote:
I think it really depends on the kit (turbo or SC). So then the choice comes down to how you like the power delivered. Big blast on turbo spool up or linear from an SC.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: BRZ
Location: Virginia
Posts: 169
Thanks: 34
Thanked 46 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
One could go with the JRSC c38 kit and throw a high boost pulley on it with e85 and yield great results. That's a good option I guess.
But requires upgrades fuel pump and injectors |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
|
Unless you're looking for something north of 600whp, the SC kits don't have any less potential.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | FRS Justin (08-03-2016) |
|
|
#24 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,564
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,213 Times in 6,856 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Panda Trueno
Join Date: Jan 2015
Drives: No twin now.
Location: North Indiana
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 2,113
Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,332 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Basically anything requires fuel pump and injectors. Don't expect to make reliable power without upgrading those pieces as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 994
Thanks: 693
Thanked 695 Times in 417 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
|
CSG Mike has experience with about every F/I kit out there. I would call him and discuss your options, Mike can give you the pros and cons of what your looking to do. I would also consider a edelbrock s/c too.
__________________
Instagram FT86PROJECT9S
Facebook FT86PROJECT9S 710whp |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: brz
Location: China/LA
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
is there an upper limit to JRSC kit's intercooler? On the HKS SC kit, the supplied intercooler is pretty small, so going higher than .6bar on the system with smaller pulley poses quite few obstacles with heat management. So far E85 is not a problem on HKS but on pure gasoline, not sure how well the results could be.
I believe superchargers on our platform creates a more balanced car over turbo-ed version, purely my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Having some troubles with OFT. | Vroomin86 | Software Tuning | 15 | 06-01-2015 06:54 PM |
| Windows 8 OFT troubles | Maboy_nelson | Software Tuning | 10 | 05-07-2015 06:22 AM |
| I'm new to turbo kits, and need help deciding what else to get in addition to a kit. | richpow | Forced Induction | 30 | 08-22-2014 12:31 PM |
| Lug nut troubles | Krait1 | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 3 | 07-14-2013 12:46 AM |
| iPod troubles | mvhull | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 20 | 11-29-2012 07:01 AM |