|
||||||
| Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, 2012 MCS
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 1,975
Thanks: 943
Thanked 570 Times in 356 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The science behind going completely catless without tune
Any automotive engineers out there, can you please explain to myself and the community what will be going on inside the engine and exhaust when you strip the system of all catalytic converters without a tune? I knew the car would stink a little, but can you just explain why exactly and how the cars reacts (naturally aspirated) because of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,334
Thanks: 698
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Simply in car engine spends less power pushing exhaust gases out through more freely flowing with less airflow resistance exhaust duct (due cat delete), leaving more power on table to actually do it's main job of moving car. Without tune gains are less, but noticeable/measurable as well. With tune you also optimize & fine tune engine various fuel/intake/exhaust parameters like cam/ignition timing, fuel ratios, to better exploit now exhaust with less resistance, gaining more.
I'm no engineer, but it seems to me very obvious, not sure if there any extra science needs to be inquired for this question, except maybe for how to project parts to optimize best to get most gains of aftermarket exhaust bits, or get less resistance while still keeping cat function or how to better exploit with tune improvements on exhaust duct and so on. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to churchx For This Useful Post: | BlueDubbinTDI (04-18-2015) |
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: (formerly) 2013 Raven FR-S
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 396
Thanks: 117
Thanked 218 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
You will likely fail most emmission tests you may get large fine if caught with no cats at all You will get a CEL code P0420 possibly slightly more power It will be louder and possibly raspy/drone unless you add resonators. It wont blow up The ecu will detect any change in intake air flow via MAF sensor and slightly changed AFR at primary 02 sensor and adjust fuel trims to compensate/correct differences in commanded and measured afr. so it runs the afr thats in the maps exhaust/intake CAM timing is not learned it just runs whats in the maps based on load and rpm ignition timing is only reduced on knock detection else it just runs whats in the maps based on load/rpm/ intake air and coolant temps ect. As the previous guy said you need tune to optimize the engine parameters for the better flow in exhaust (and disable the cel code for cat efficiency) to extract extra power. Last edited by steve99; 04-18-2015 at 12:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | malave7567 (04-18-2015) |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, 2012 MCS
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 1,975
Thanks: 943
Thanked 570 Times in 356 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS
Location: Virginia
Posts: 58
Thanks: 24
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
TL;DR... not factoring in performance gains, will it be ok to run catless headers as a daily driver?? Obviously the tune is ideal, but for right now would it be fine just so I can get some rumble?
Hey guys, sorry to revive this dead thread, but I’ve been doing a good amount of research on this topic and I feel like I’m getting conflicting answers. I want to get UEL headers and a tune eventually, but is the statement above accurate? Will the engine be fine running without a tune? I’m not too concerned about power right now and will most likely get a tune within the next several months, but my budget is allowing me to get a UEL right now and all I really want is the subi rumble lol. I’ve read a couple of times that the engine will start running lean due to increased airflow... but then I’ve also read that the ECU will adapt and there isn’t much to worry about.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,646
Thanks: 26,684
Thanked 12,705 Times in 6,293 Posts
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I think the ECU can adapt up to +-20% fueling to adjust afr. But it would take about a hundred miles to even out by my estimate. And that's only really effective at closed loop rpms and loads. Once you hit open loop the adjustment remains, but only in the rpm bands you have been in under closed loop conditions, which is not in the fun zone. That means you may be running a bit lean up top where there are no adjustments made. That being said, you CAN do it, but there is always an amount of risk. Also, I would imagine your engine would run like crap going from an equal length header to an unequal length header without a tune. I haven't done it myself or looked into it much, that's just my logic from knowing how pressure waves work. As an alternative, there's gotta be a catback out there with the right resonator/muffler combo to give you the sound you want if that's all you are going for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Human
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2015 BRZ Black
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 208
Thanks: 105
Thanked 102 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Think of the engine as a giant air pump. When you restrict the intake or exhaust, less air flows, which puts more strain on the engine to move the air. The catalytic converters are basically a mesh that restrict the airflow, as well as mufflers.
__________________
"Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done, and why. Then do it." - The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS
Location: Virginia
Posts: 58
Thanks: 24
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Spuds- ok got ya, thanks a lot for the good info! Definitely will probably hold off on that since this is my only car :/ but trust me if there was just an exhaust I could get to have that rumble I would. But I guess the UELs are the only way to get the sound I want. It’s irrational, but there’s just something about that sound that always gives me those good goosebumps
![]() Spawn- hmm I see what you’re saying, and that makes sense in terms of why the headers would improve the power. So from what you said, would doing the catless headers actually help with engine life expectancy (even if negligible)? I’m assuming this would be the case as long as the ecu and engine are on the same page. Thanks for the replies guys. All of my car knowledge comes from forums and I have very little practical experience, so hearing it from you all definitely helps sounds like I should just play it safe and get the tune with the headers.. gah I hate my impatience lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Drives: 2022 BRZ Limited Silver
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,533
Thanks: 883
Thanked 2,048 Times in 1,190 Posts
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I’m the opposite. Can’t stand the boxer 4 UEL sound. My dream would be a Porsche boxer 6 sound. I used to like the rumble but I guess that was ruined by the gazillion WRXs that are all over the place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS
Location: Virginia
Posts: 58
Thanks: 24
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Oh god i would be a happy camper with that H6 soundtrack... future goals for sure my man, I can agree with that! Fortunately my area is full of a lot of modded Hondas... so hearing the wrx sound is refreshing for me lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: BRZ
Location: Mendocino County
Posts: 369
Thanks: 7
Thanked 96 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
rare phenotype is attractive. its why beards go in and out of style
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
not playing cards
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 32,395
Thanks: 53,053
Thanked 37,228 Times in 19,308 Posts
Mentioned: 1117 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
|
I've always loved the sound of a four-banger missing a cylinder. That's muh jam.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Huge E85 fan!
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: 2016 Scion FRS
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 539
Thanked 1,010 Times in 605 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Catless with no no tune will give you a small jump in power, but not much. Without a tune the ECU only allows for something like 5% more power with hardware mods. Having no cats allows the tuner to use more timing advance (if you advance the timing too much with the cats in place you will damage the cats and lose a lot of power and damage the engine).
Catless with no tune won't hurt the engine but if you don't do something about the P0420 than you will have a CEL and lose cruise control. Catless tunes turn off the CEL for P0420 as well as increasing engine output over that 5% limit Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| catless header vs catless frontpipe | steveholt | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 30 | 10-10-2017 08:13 PM |
| Should I get a tune for a catless exhaust system? | Astroboy | Forced Induction | 3 | 09-03-2014 09:11 PM |
| Fact vs Fiction: Catless front pipe (no tune) | BlueDubbinTDI | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 7 | 11-04-2013 11:11 PM |
| Critter with gears - why I love science! | bestwheelbase | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 3 | 09-15-2013 08:01 AM |