|
||||||
| Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,997 Times in 2,985 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
|
temperature plays a significant part in maf scaling as air density changes with themperature so its best id your maf scaling data is collected at arround the same temperatures
its best to try to do it at the average temperatures for your climate. your fuel trims will always vary with extremes of temperature as ecu compensates for air density changes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: fr-s
Location: Gatineau
Posts: 65
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
well guys I fee like an idiot today and I guess I am probably not the only one that didnt figure that out
When ppl are talking about default values and all that stuff I was always wondering where they were getting those. I figured it out 2day. On the mafscaling tool if do like me and use the LOAD LOG button with an OFT log nothing is going to be written down.... What you have to do is open your long once it is saved and remove the 3 1st row saying Procede Data Log OpenFlash Data File 1 14 once removed save your log again. Go back in the mafscaling tool and in the load log button you will see your categories and the default values mentionned before. If you do it by hand like I used to. The open loop is a real PITA. Ya, I totally missed that and was doing all by hand up to today. I just figured that out.... Anyway back to datalogging I guess It will be a lot easier now.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,633 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
|
Open loop should be easier. I would just try and ensure 3 full throttle pulls from around
2.5k in the same year in the same log and just ignore the 1st 5 lines of data and that should remove the difference as the AFRs drop as you get on it. Personally I like to set the open loop fuel table to a flat AFR in thecWOT region to minimize error. If you've already done the closed loop, once you've got your open loop sorted then smooth the end curve.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: fr-s
Location: Gatineau
Posts: 65
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
hey guys quick question. As for now all my datalog I always see a minimal change in my new maf scaling (less than 3% lets say). My LTFT when I am cruising are always in the +/- 5% range but when I am at idle at a light they always rise to more than 10-15%. Is it bad maf scaling or that is normal ?
Thanks Eric |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,633 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
|
Quote:
There is also more than MAF at play at low IPW, namely injector latency. How bothered you are at reducing all the errors and the time you have to do it is up to you.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 143
Thanks: 22
Thanked 44 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
|
What would be the result of skipping CL and OL tabs all together and simply pasting your current MAF scale into the MAF Rescale tab and copying the new MAF scale created then pasting it to your tune in RomRaider?
Sent from my Galaxy S8+ using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,633 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
|
The result will be that the car will behave exactly the same as before.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 143
Thanks: 22
Thanked 44 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Sent from my Galaxy S8+ using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,633 Times in 1,113 Posts
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
|
The most accurate would be to rescale it 1st, then use the MAF scaling tabs in whichever order you like.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 143
Thanks: 22
Thanked 44 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
|
So after I have CL smoothed out, should I copy the new MAF scale from the CL tab and paste it into the OL current MAF scale field and then start smoothing?
I should be ready to copy to my ROM file at that point, correct? Sent from my Galaxy S8+ using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Perrin 3" Intake MAF Scaling | 86drift | Software Tuning | 18 | 08-09-2016 05:05 PM |
| Port injector scaling | ztan | Software Tuning | 28 | 04-10-2016 03:45 AM |
| Scaling for vortech 2.5 bar map sensor? | Frs32907 | Software Tuning | 2 | 11-08-2015 05:41 PM |
| What MAF scaling says about your intake | BuBlake | Software Tuning | 27 | 12-09-2014 05:01 AM |
| BRZEdit MAP scaling | jamesm | Software Tuning | 13 | 10-02-2013 12:43 PM |