OFT v2.06 Non-Beta - Page 15 - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

JB86'd · 09-18-2014, 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2much

cool thanks!

Maybe it's just me... but I am having a hard time finding documentation on this thing. Nowhere did it say that the ecu will continue to adjust after the initial startup.

Theres no descriptions of the stock tuning files... I guessed that UEL and EL were for different headers, but what does AOC mean?

The only engine mods I have at this point is a k/n air filter and a perrin inlet tube... out of the 5 tunes that came shipped, i chose the stg1 AOC - is that correct?

Thanks for your patience if you decide to answer my noob questions

A0C is your rom calibration. Yes stg 1 would be correct for you. Anytime your ECU is reflashed or reset it must learn, not just with the OFT. Theres youtube videos, and quite a few threads you can read through about tuning, datalogging, etc. find a post by @steve99 , in his signature he has some links to tutorials and a ton of great info. Read up!

2much · 09-18-2014, 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JB86'd

A0C is your rom calibration. Yes stg 1 would be correct for you. Anytime your ECU is reflashed or reset it must learn, not just with the OFT. Theres youtube videos, and quite a few threads you can read through about tuning, datalogging, etc. find a post by @steve99 , in his signature he has some links to tutorials and a ton of great info. Read up!

sprintamx · 09-18-2014, 12:51 PM

I've been on V2.06 Stg 2 EL 93 oct map for less than a week with about 30 miles, and was on the V2.01 map version for about 3-4 weeks prior. V2.01 had less throttle lag and "felt" like it produced a bit more power through 3.5 - 5K rpms, than V2.06. With the current map the lag is significant up to 3.5 - 3.7K rpms, and while power generation is smooth thereafter, it "seems" to build a bit slower than when I had V2.01 loaded.

Previously I ran V1.59 Stage 2 EL E85 and that tune rocked! But, I decided to move back to 93 oct for the winter and convenience since only one station by me carries E85.

If it helps work through this, I have a 2013 BRZ with a K&N drop-in (no other intake mods than removing and capping the sound tube) a catless EL header, and a Nameless catback (for sound and looks).

Disclosure: I've been lazy and have not captured any logs. If I need to do that for the sake of the community, I'll get off my duff and bone up on the process.

I will also comment that discussion seems to be all over the map regarding whether / if / how long the ECU needs to calibrate a new map. For those of us that only have a glimmer of tuning process and architecture it can be confusing.

Cheers.

Shiv@Openflash · 09-18-2014, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sprintamx

I've been on V2.06 Stg 2 EL 93 oct map for less than a week with about 30 miles, and was on the V2.01 map version for about 3-4 weeks prior. V2.01 had less throttle lag and "felt" like it produced a bit more power through 3.5 - 5K rpms, than V2.06. With the current map the lag is significant up to 3.5 - 3.7K rpms, and while power generation is smooth thereafter, it "seems" to build a bit slower than when I had V2.01 loaded.

Previously I ran V1.59 Stage 2 EL E85 and that tune rocked! But, I decided to move back to 93 oct for the winter and convenience since only one station by me carries E85.

If it helps work through this, I have a 2013 BRZ with a K&N drop-in (no other intake mods than removing and capping the sound tube) a catless EL header, and a Nameless catback (for sound and looks).

Disclosure: I've been lazy and have not captured any logs. If I need to do that for the sake of the community, I'll get off my duff and bone up on the process.

I will also comment that discussion seems to be all over the map regarding whether / if / how long the ECU needs to calibrate a new map. For those of us that only have a glimmer of tuning process and architecture it can be confusing.

Cheers.

There are no mapping changes between any of the 2.0x ROMs. So v2.01 is identical to v2.06. The increment only indicates additional ROM support as the read me file documents.

KonTheory · 09-18-2014, 04:15 PM

Hi,
So I recently updated my map from 1.59 to 2.0
at first it was different but now if feels great.. a few hundred kms later..
so I wanted to try out the launch control..
I came to a stop on an empty road and put the gas down, it was holding at around 5800rpm
but when I dropped the clutch it bogged right down, no wheel chirp at all, and felt really slow.. is that normal? I had trac control completely off.. and after I did it.. I could smell my clutch..

Shiv@Openflash · 09-18-2014, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KonTheory

Hi,
So I recently updated my map from 1.59 to 2.0
at first it was different but now if feels great.. a few hundred kms later..
so I wanted to try out the launch control..
I came to a stop on an empty road and put the gas down, it was holding at around 5800rpm
but when I dropped the clutch it bogged right down, no wheel chirp at all, and felt really slow.. is that normal? I had trac control completely off.. and after I did it.. I could smell my clutch..

That's smell is your clutch slipping. Unless you are ready to replace it soon, I would refrain from the clutch dumps

KonTheory · 09-18-2014, 04:24 PM

LOL, I hope not, only 14000kms on my car, never tracked and commute to work 100kms a day... Im not even hard on it..

Kronos · 09-18-2014, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KonTheory

LOL, I hope not, only 14000kms on my car, never tracked and commute to work 100kms a day... Im not even hard on it..

Except when you dump the clutch

I kid I kid

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

fantah · 09-18-2014, 05:03 PM

Yep mines will be gone soon... But then again I rally my car hahahaha. Break stuff then get better ones!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kronos

Except when you dump the clutch

I kid I kid

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

KonTheory · 09-18-2014, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kronos

Except when you dump the clutch

I kid I kid

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well you know... had to try it out :P

steve99 · 09-18-2014, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KonTheory

LOL, I hope not, only 14000kms on my car, never tracked and commute to work 100kms a day... Im not even hard on it..

Im not supprised it bogged down on 17x9 wheels with nitto tyres thats serious rubber on a basicly stock car.

check the mod list in his signiture..... lol

ZZT86 · 09-19-2014, 06:58 AM

@ Shiv - Who is that guy after the OFH OFT in your siggie ? Reminds of Juan Epstein from Welcome Back, Kotter

troek · 09-19-2014, 09:25 PM

andy samberg

troek · 09-19-2014, 09:37 PM

ok, heres a log with the newest tune, ive never been able to realy log flkc before, so maybe ive always had this and never noticed. but theres over -1.0 flkc at top. maybe my afr is too lean? or is this small enough to not worry about. everything else seems perfect.
http://datazap.me/u/troek/v206-pull-...-4-5-6-7-10-12

09-18-2014, 04:15 PM	#201
KonTheory Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Drives: '14 FRS Location: Wetcoast, Canada Posts: 113 Thanks: 31 Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Hi, So I recently updated my map from 1.59 to 2.0 at first it was different but now if feels great.. a few hundred kms later.. so I wanted to try out the launch control.. I came to a stop on an empty road and put the gas down, it was holding at around 5800rpm but when I dropped the clutch it bogged right down, no wheel chirp at all, and felt really slow.. is that normal? I had trac control completely off.. and after I did it.. I could smell my clutch.. __________________ '14 Raven FRS - Toyota Badges - Helix Smoked Side Markers - K&N Drop-in - 3" Nameless Axleback 4" Mufflers - Tinted Back Windows - RCE Yellow Springs - Openflash Tablet - OLM HID Kit - Cusco strut bar - TRD Quickshifter - 17x9 Enkei RPF1's with Nitto NT05's

09-18-2014, 04:24 PM	#203
KonTheory Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Drives: '14 FRS Location: Wetcoast, Canada Posts: 113 Thanks: 31 Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	LOL, I hope not, only 14000kms on my car, never tracked and commute to work 100kms a day... Im not even hard on it.. __________________ '14 Raven FRS - Toyota Badges - Helix Smoked Side Markers - K&N Drop-in - 3" Nameless Axleback 4" Mufflers - Tinted Back Windows - RCE Yellow Springs - Openflash Tablet - OLM HID Kit - Cusco strut bar - TRD Quickshifter - 17x9 Enkei RPF1's with Nitto NT05's

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
OFT Tune for OFH+Phantom ESC with 1.5 Dump Pack [Beta]	Shiv@Openflash	Forced Induction	226	03-12-2019 10:26 PM
iOS 8 beta 1 not working on BRZ USB	Kids Heart	Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS]	4	04-13-2015 09:17 PM
v2.01 Phantom ESC 1.5+OFH (BETA)... now supports USDM 6AT	Shiv@Openflash	Forced Induction	3	07-26-2014 01:23 PM
OFT 1.42 vs 1.5x Beta Who notices a Difference?	Cross	Software Tuning	11	03-21-2014 04:17 PM
Anyone want to beta-test some door speaker spacers?	phenryiv1	Electronics \| Audio \| NAV \| Infotainment	63	08-20-2012 10:02 PM

09-18-2014, 12:51 PM	#199
sprintamx Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Drives: 2013 BRZ Location: Mid-Atlantic Posts: 128 Thanks: 26 Thanked 51 Times in 29 Posts Mentioned: 3 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I've been on V2.06 Stg 2 EL 93 oct map for less than a week with about 30 miles, and was on the V2.01 map version for about 3-4 weeks prior. V2.01 had less throttle lag and "felt" like it produced a bit more power through 3.5 - 5K rpms, than V2.06. With the current map the lag is significant up to 3.5 - 3.7K rpms, and while power generation is smooth thereafter, it "seems" to build a bit slower than when I had V2.01 loaded. Previously I ran V1.59 Stage 2 EL E85 and that tune rocked! But, I decided to move back to 93 oct for the winter and convenience since only one station by me carries E85. If it helps work through this, I have a 2013 BRZ with a K&N drop-in (no other intake mods than removing and capping the sound tube) a catless EL header, and a Nameless catback (for sound and looks). Disclosure: I've been lazy and have not captured any logs. If I need to do that for the sake of the community, I'll get off my duff and bone up on the process. I will also comment that discussion seems to be all over the map regarding whether / if / how long the ECU needs to calibrate a new map. For those of us that only have a glimmer of tuning process and architecture it can be confusing. Cheers.

09-19-2014, 06:58 AM	#208
ZZT86 Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Drives: BR86 Location: Location Posts: 841 Thanks: 310 Thanked 146 Times in 114 Posts Mentioned: 5 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	@ Shiv - Who is that guy after the OFH OFT in your siggie ? Reminds of Juan Epstein from Welcome Back, Kotter

User Name		Remember Me?
Password