follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2014, 08:37 PM   #57
Thatruth2001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Raven FR-S
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 295
Thanks: 10
Thanked 184 Times in 87 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Target70 View Post
I may just be crazy, but I still want to see 2 phantom compressors hooked up in series on the car.
10 psi witin ~.5 seconds of WOT. We would have to limit boost to ~7psi for stock engine config. Have maybe 4psi over 6k, if the boost scales 1 to 1. This should keep us from needing new clutch,cooling,fuel mods. Fitment would be easy if you ran a CAI, or some slight piping work to use the stock airbox. The alt charger could just be another controller and could control the second compressor. Both could be hooked up to the same throttle switch for activation. All that would leave is the need for a dump 2.0. 1 dump pack for each compressor, or if It will fit; two 1.5's. I realize this is getting really expensive and outside the purpose for the phantom kit, but I can't help but think about the upgrade path of the ESC. I don't know if the OFT could tune for that type of setup, but think about it, double(theoretically) the boost acrost the range for an extra $1600. If you already have a 2.0dump and OFT.

ok bored rant over, commence crushing my dreams.
My dreams were crushed by Rob within 5 minutes of asking this question August last year when I started running the kit.....
Thatruth2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 09:02 PM   #58
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,470 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jflogerzi View Post
I have no testing but based on dyno posted by several shops in an na application shows that EL headers like jdl and hks had better top in power. Not sure if the same logic can be applied to this scenario.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk
I've tested almost all the available UEL and EL headers available. Both in NA and ESC application and UEL, on the whole, is generally superior. The don't make the dip worse and earlier in the rpm range like some long long runner EL headers and they don't just offer a small power advantage, in a very narrow rpm range, like some large diameter EL headers. Instead they tend to keep the dip where it is, just lessen the severity of it while having the most average power from 4000-7500rpm. In fact they are usually a good deal better than the ELs I've tested in the 7000-7500 range.

We have done a lot of testing over the last year and it's not surprise that we ended up developing a UEL. Unfotunately all the testing in the word doesn't seem to matter as much as hearsay or quotes from an outdated book (pre VVT) about exhaust design.

Last edited by Shiv@Openflash; 07-09-2014 at 10:44 PM.
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Shiv@Openflash For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (07-10-2014), keen as (07-09-2014), Khyron686 (07-08-2014), raven1231 (07-08-2014), Sojhinn (07-08-2014)
Old 07-09-2014, 10:00 PM   #59
Jac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Fiat Abarth
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 204
Thanks: 23
Thanked 96 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Has anyone dyno'd the new tune verses the old yet? Based on the logs (cleaner/richer AFRs) I'm seeing we must be gaining a little power on the low end.
__________________

Phantom Supercharged BRZ | 205WHP / 185WTQ
Nameless FP/OP Combo

Jac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 03:47 AM   #60
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,470 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
JUST RELEASED: v2.0 OTS tunes for ESC w/ 1.5 dump + OFH

Hi guys,

Thanks for all the positive feedback on these Beta maps we released last week. Now they are officially non-BETA (v1.6) as reflected on the website. No changes to the mapping, just the name. So no need to write them again to your ECU if you already did before.

But more importantly, NEW v2.0 OTS ROMs (BETA tunes for ESC w/1.5 dump+OFH) are now available for USDM 6MT cars only. The big step from 1.X to 2.0 is justified by the all new maps being based on the newest B01C ROM, instead of the older A01C ROM. This new ROM incorporates the latest factory updates and should improve idle stability among other things. So if you have a 6MT, it's worth updating to the v2.0 maps. They can be downloaded HERE, last link on the bottom of the page.

After writing the map to the ECU, you can verify that your new ROM's CAL ID is B01C by going to TUNING->ECU Info and looking at CAL ID. It should say ZA1JB01C there and ONLY there. You will still see your native (original) CAL ID in OpenFlash Manager software, whatever that may be (ZA1JA01C, ZA1JA00C, ZA1JA900C, etc.)

With these new v2.0 OTS ESC maps, Launch Control RPM is set to 5500RPM. Flat-Foot Shift is function but disabled (RPM set to 0) for the time being. DO NOT edit these ROMs. New XDF files will be required to edit this maps. I have not released these files yet. If you attempt to edit certain tables using the existing XDF files, you may brick your ECU. So once again, DO NOT EDIT THESE ROMs.

Once again, these v2.0 tunes are considered BETA. Once we get some feedback from users, they will become non-BETA. After that, we will add support for 6AT and non-USDM ROMs.

Enjoy and please let me know how the new maps work for you

Cheers,
Shiv
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Shiv@Openflash For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (07-10-2014), enwave (07-10-2014), keen as (07-11-2014), Khyron686 (07-10-2014), raven1231 (07-10-2014), Sojhinn (07-10-2014), WRB5titch (07-10-2014)
Old 07-10-2014, 07:15 AM   #61
TM
Senior Member
 
TM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: DGM BRZ 6MT
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 758
Thanks: 223
Thanked 359 Times in 195 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
After writing the map to the ECU, you can verify that your new ROM's CAL ID is B01C by going to TUNING->ECU Info and looking at CAL ID. It should say ZA1JB01C there and ONLY there. You will still see your native (original) CAL ID in OpenFlash Manager software, whatever that may be (ZA1JA01C, ZA1JA00C, ZA1JA900C, etc.)
Hey @shiv@vishnu,

I just flashed to the v2.0 OTS 93oct beta map, but the calibration code on my tablet still says ZA1JA00C. Did I do something wrong?
__________________
TM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 07:43 AM   #62
raven1231
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S, 2016 DGM WRX
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,580
Thanks: 8,264
Thanked 3,118 Times in 1,667 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TM View Post
Hey @shiv@vishnu,

I just flashed to the v2.0 OTS 93oct beta map, but the calibration code on my tablet still says ZA1JA00C. Did I do something wrong?
hmmm... he said it should change on the tablet just not on the openflash manager. But it sounds like it hasn't changed on the actual tablet. I'll try mine in a little bit and see what it does.
raven1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 08:35 AM   #63
TM
Senior Member
 
TM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: DGM BRZ 6MT
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 758
Thanks: 223
Thanked 359 Times in 195 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Here's my datalog with the v2.0 OTS 93oct map: http://datazap.me/u/tm/v20b-ofh-esc-...=0&data=2-3-11

I didn't get a chance to do several 3rd gear pulls, but there are sporadic pulls here and there in different gears, which I thought was better than nothing.
__________________
TM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 01:39 PM   #64
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,470 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TM View Post
Here's my datalog with the v2.0 OTS 93oct map: http://datazap.me/u/tm/v20b-ofh-esc-...=0&data=2-3-11

I didn't get a chance to do several 3rd gear pulls, but there are sporadic pulls here and there in different gears, which I thought was better than nothing.
Looks great! Thank you
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 07:21 PM   #65
raven1231
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FR-S, 2016 DGM WRX
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 4,580
Thanks: 8,264
Thanked 3,118 Times in 1,667 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Hey Shiv here is a 3rd gear pull on the new V2 93 octane 1.5 tune:
http://datazap.me/u/raven1231/v2-esc...og=0&data=1-12
The tune itself felt good as well
__________________
raven1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 09:46 PM   #66
Sojhinn
Lightning McQueen Driver
 
Sojhinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: Limited Red 6MT BRZ
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,242
Thanks: 753
Thanked 1,167 Times in 644 Posts
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
Hi guys,

Thanks for all the positive feedback on these Beta maps we released last week. Now they are officially non-BETA (v1.6) as reflected on the website. No changes to the mapping, just the name. So no need to write them again to your ECU if you already did before.

But more importantly, NEW v2.0 OTS ROMs (BETA tunes for ESC w/1.5 dump+OFH) are now available for USDM 6MT cars only. The big step from 1.X to 2.0 is justified by the all new maps being based on the newest B01C ROM, instead of the older A01C ROM. This new ROM incorporates the latest factory updates and should improve idle stability among other things. So if you have a 6MT, it's worth updating to the v2.0 maps. They can be downloaded HERE, last link on the bottom of the page.

After writing the map to the ECU, you can verify that your new ROM's CAL ID is B01C by going to TUNING->ECU Info and looking at CAL ID. It should say ZA1JB01C there and ONLY there. You will still see your native (original) CAL ID in OpenFlash Manager software, whatever that may be (ZA1JA01C, ZA1JA00C, ZA1JA900C, etc.)

With these new v2.0 OTS ESC maps, Launch Control RPM is set to 5500RPM. Flat-Foot Shift is function but disabled (RPM set to 0) for the time being. DO NOT edit these ROMs. New XDF files will be required to edit this maps. I have not released these files yet. If you attempt to edit certain tables using the existing XDF files, you may brick your ECU. So once again, DO NOT EDIT THESE ROMs.

Once again, these v2.0 tunes are considered BETA. Once we get some feedback from users, they will become non-BETA. After that, we will add support for 6AT and non-USDM ROMs.

Enjoy and please let me know how the new maps work for you

Cheers,
Shiv
http://www.datazap.me/u/sojhinn/15-e...og=0&data=1-12

Datalog third gear pulls. Car feels great. I didn't get to play around with the 1.6 too much, but compared to the old tune it feels nice and smooth. Starts seem different, but haven't had any issues. Also the idle issues seemed fix, but it is weird how coming to a stop it seems to drop low then kicks back up. Haven't had a single issue though with anything it may be that I am getting picky.

Also I am not hitting max boost because I swapped one of my big dump pack batteries. Hopefully it breaks in soon.
__________________
Nicknamed Lightning by my Kids.

Installed Mods:
Phantom Electric Super Charger | Open Flash Tune | Perrin OP/ HFC Front pipe | Invidia Q300 catback | ST Suspension | JDL Header | Flex Fuel
Sojhinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 12:37 AM   #67
WRB5titch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: WRBrz
Location: SoCal
Posts: 142
Thanks: 374
Thanked 67 Times in 41 Posts
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
http://datazap.me/u/wrb5titch/phanto...2&zoom=718-817

Log of a third gear pull. Car's feeling great, although I did run into a couple issues when I first flashed.

Threw the rom onto the tablet and went to flash as usual, oft asked me to turn car on and confirm, which I did (ignition on, but car not started), after some time it asked me to switch the car on again but the car was already on. I hit ok. It does it's thing then fails to write the rom to the ecu and asks me to try again...

So...I go back, delete the tune off the oft and put it back on. Attempt the flash and it works this time....start the car up and it's struggling to start, wait 4 minutes then drive around the car would pull pretty well but at stop lights it would start idle hunting. Very much like the stock rom did back in the day. Unfortunately I don't have any logs of this event.

So, round 3. Take the rom off and put it back on, this time I put it on slot 2 instead of 5 (not sure that matters but wth, why not) go back out, reflash the car without issue, and return with the log.

What happened? who knows.. but the car's running great now. No more idle hunting, and it definitely feels smoother and a bit more refined.
__________________
EBSC - dt.FF - MXP CompRS
WRB5titch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 12:42 AM   #68
Shiv@Openflash
Senior Member
 
Shiv@Openflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,629
Thanks: 1,055
Thanked 5,470 Times in 1,494 Posts
Mentioned: 605 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRB5titch View Post
http://datazap.me/u/wrb5titch/phanto...2&zoom=718-817

Log of a third gear pull. Car's feeling great, although I did run into a couple issues when I first flashed.

Threw the rom onto the tablet and went to flash as usual, oft asked me to turn car on and confirm, which I did (ignition on, but car not started), after some time it asked me to switch the car on again but the car was already on. I hit ok. It does it's thing then fails to write the rom to the ecu and asks me to try again...

So...I go back, delete the tune off the oft and put it back on. Attempt the flash and it works this time....start the car up and it's struggling to start, wait 4 minutes then drive around the car would pull pretty well but at stop lights it would start idle hunting. Very much like the stock rom did back in the day. Unfortunately I don't have any logs of this event.

So, round 3. Take the rom off and put it back on, this time I put it on slot 2 instead of 5 (not sure that matters but wth, why not) go back out, reflash the car without issue, and return with the log.

What happened? who knows.. but the car's running great now. No more idle hunting, and it definitely feels smoother and a bit more refined.
I don't think you needed to do any of that ROM juggling. It sounds to me that the OFT connector either wasn't plugged in security the first attempt or that your ignition power wasn't fully ON during the first flash. Erasing and uploading maps on new memory banks don't have any effect. But glad its running well and the log looks great!
Shiv@Openflash is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Shiv@Openflash For This Useful Post:
WRB5titch (07-11-2014)
Old 07-11-2014, 01:49 AM   #69
WRB5titch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: WRBrz
Location: SoCal
Posts: 142
Thanks: 374
Thanked 67 Times in 41 Posts
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Good to know for next time, thanks @shiv@vishnu!!
__________________
EBSC - dt.FF - MXP CompRS
WRB5titch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2014, 04:40 AM   #70
Fast_Freddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Passat
Location: East Coast
Posts: 626
Thanks: 331
Thanked 188 Times in 130 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenton View Post
That's as far as our narrow band can read. Max resolution of the sensor.

Wrong on both counts. Our Denso "AFR sensor" is a wide band and can read richer than 11.02:1. The resolution limit in this case is the software.
Fast_Freddy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phantom TQ250 Dyno FBO (Dual Battery Pack) Shiv@Openflash Forced Induction 23 04-29-2014 02:40 AM
Clutch dump at 5000 RPM? fasteddy BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 20 08-22-2013 01:55 PM
External dump and under tray? mrk1 Forced Induction 5 07-30-2013 09:43 AM
Photo dump. CanibeatNoel FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 11 07-17-2013 02:47 AM
Ricepuddin Picture Dump Ricepuddin FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 15 12-03-2012 12:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.