OFT Tune for OFH+Phantom ESC with 1.5 Dump Pack [Beta] - Page 4 - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

Shiv@Openflash · 07-05-2014, 07:40 PM

The highest boost pressure the factory MAP sensor is capable of reading is right around 5psi (depending on atmospheric pressure). So if you see your boost logs flatline somewhere around that, it could very well be higher.

Shiv

DAEMANO · 07-05-2014, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenton

Want to say a big thanks to @shiv@vishnu on another quality tune. This tune feels stronger than the last which was already great

Shiv do you know why some of us up here in Calgary(specifically with ofh) are bottoming out the AFR when on boost?

Tq250 log
http://www.datazap.me/u/fenton108/tq...&zoom=811-1056

Tq300 log
http://www.datazap.me/u/fenton108/93...zoom=3025-3131

Wow @fenton you were right when saying the TQ250 spools faster and has really closed the gap on the TQ300. I compared your first TQ250 and TQ300 runs and the logs bear out how quickly the TQ250 gets up and on boost. Tried to get the pulls as "apples to apples" as I could from your logs starting both at 2692 RPM (TQ250) and 2691 RPM (TQ300).

Data is here (fascinating):
http://datazap.me/sites/default/file...20070514_0.csv

Graph is here:
http://datazap.me/u/daemano/phantom-...4&mark=28-0-99

Urmyson · 07-05-2014, 10:41 PM

Does everyone who is running this tune have the OFH?

DAEMANO · 07-05-2014, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urmyson

Does everyone who is running this tune have the OFH?

No. Some are on stock, modified, or aftermarket headers including but not limited to the OFH. Check out the Phantom ESC owners thread for an idea of ppls setups.

jflogerzi · 07-05-2014, 10:51 PM

If you you are looking for a header to use with this kit, the JDL EL header is your best option. EL headers provide better top in power. UEL headers were great for NA cars as it provided better TQ in the DIP than EL. I would love to see the 1.5 dump 250 setup with a full Exhaust and no cats with a JDL EL header with E85 could produce.

fenton · 07-06-2014, 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEMANO

Wow @fenton you were right when saying the TQ250 spools faster and has really closed the gap on the TQ300. I compared your first TQ250 and TQ300 runs and the logs bear out how quickly the TQ250 gets up and on boost. Tried to get the pulls as "apples to apples" as I could from your logs starting both at 2692 RPM (TQ250) and 2691 RPM (TQ300).

Data is here (fascinating):
http://datazap.me/sites/default/file...20070514_0.csv

Graph is here:
http://datazap.me/u/daemano/phantom-...4&mark=28-0-99

Did you line then up when they both went full throttle though? Because I think the 300 did actually go wot until a little bit after.

DAEMANO · 07-06-2014, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenton

Did you line then up when they both went full throttle though? Because I think the 300 did actually go wot until a little bit after.

This really is a non-scientific comparison of a section of the two logs you posted. IIRC the 300 log had several pulls in it. Which one are you referring to? I started the comparison where the engine RPM increased continuously with no dips from about 2600 RPM to beyond 6k RPM. However since they were your pulls and logs I'm sure you'll have the keenest insights.

fenton · 07-06-2014, 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEMANO

This really is a non-scientific comparison of a section of the two logs you posted. IIRC the 300 log had several pulls in it. Which one are you referring to? I started the comparison where the engine RPM increased continuously with no dips from about 2600 RPM to beyond 6k RPM. However since they were your pulls and logs I'm sure you'll have the keenest insights.

Ya they both had multiple. The real take away is the 250 is actually a solid performer especially when it comes to spool and bottom end.

Sing4LTS · 07-08-2014, 04:34 PM

Will the TQ300 every be available for purchase?

Sojhinn · 07-08-2014, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sing4LTS

Will the TQ300 every be available for purchase?

The tq300 is still in beta testing but it doesn't make sense for BRZ or frs in its current form. The tq 250 spools up faster and has almost identical boost levels.

Boofneenee · 07-08-2014, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jflogerzi

If you you are looking for a header to use with this kit, the JDL EL header is your best option. EL headers provide better top in power. UEL headers were great for NA cars as it provided better TQ in the DIP than EL. I would love to see the 1.5 dump 250 setup with a full Exhaust and no cats with a JDL EL header with E85 could produce.

Shiv@Openflash · 07-08-2014, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jflogerzi

If you you are looking for a header to use with this kit, the JDL EL header is your best option. EL headers provide better top in power. UEL headers were great for NA cars as it provided better TQ in the DIP than EL. I would love to see the 1.5 dump 250 setup with a full Exhaust and no cats with a JDL EL header with E85 could produce.

What testing have you done or seen to confirm this? I've seen the opposite.

jflogerzi · 07-08-2014, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

What testing have you done or seen to confirm this? I've seen the opposite.

I have no testing but based on dyno posted by several shops in an na application shows that EL headers like jdl and hks had better top in power. Not sure if the same logic can be applied to this scenario.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk

Target70 · 07-08-2014, 08:19 PM

I may just be crazy, but I still want to see 2 phantom compressors hooked up in series on the car.
10 psi witin ~.5 seconds of WOT. We would have to limit boost to ~7psi for stock engine config. Have maybe 4psi over 6k, if the boost scales 1 to 1. This should keep us from needing new clutch,cooling,fuel mods. Fitment would be easy if you ran a CAI, or some slight piping work to use the stock airbox. The alt charger could just be another controller and could control the second compressor. Both could be hooked up to the same throttle switch for activation. All that would leave is the need for a dump 2.0. 1 dump pack for each compressor, or if It will fit; two 1.5's. I realize this is getting really expensive and outside the purpose for the phantom kit, but I can't help but think about the upgrade path of the ESC. I don't know if the OFT could tune for that type of setup, but think about it, double(theoretically) the boost acrost the range for an extra $1600. If you already have a 2.0dump and OFT.

ok bored rant over, commence crushing my dreams.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Phantom TQ250 Dyno FBO (Dual Battery Pack)	Shiv@Openflash	Forced Induction	23	04-29-2014 02:40 AM
Clutch dump at 5000 RPM?	fasteddy	BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics	20	08-22-2013 01:55 PM
External dump and under tray?	mrk1	Forced Induction	5	07-30-2013 09:43 AM
Photo dump.	CanibeatNoel	FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum	11	07-17-2013 02:47 AM
Ricepuddin Picture Dump	Ricepuddin	FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum	15	12-03-2012 12:18 AM

07-05-2014, 07:40 PM	#43
Shiv@Openflash Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Drives: 2013 FRS Location: SF, CA Posts: 2,629 Thanks: 1,055 Thanked 5,470 Times in 1,494 Posts Mentioned: 605 Post(s) Tagged: 9 Thread(s)	The highest boost pressure the factory MAP sensor is capable of reading is right around 5psi (depending on atmospheric pressure). So if you see your boost logs flatline somewhere around that, it could very well be higher. Shiv

07-05-2014, 10:41 PM	#45
Urmyson Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Drives: BRZ Location: FL Posts: 191 Thanks: 12 Thanked 45 Times in 28 Posts Mentioned: 5 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Does everyone who is running this tune have the OFH?

07-08-2014, 04:34 PM	#51
Sing4LTS Member Join Date: May 2013 Drives: 13' FR-S Location: La Porte, TX Posts: 32 Thanks: 4 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Will the TQ300 every be available for purchase?

07-08-2014, 08:19 PM	#56
Target70 Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Drives: 2013 Asphalt 6spd Location: Mid GA Posts: 783 Thanks: 265 Thanked 366 Times in 240 Posts Mentioned: 18 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I may just be crazy, but I still want to see 2 phantom compressors hooked up in series on the car. 10 psi witin ~.5 seconds of WOT. We would have to limit boost to ~7psi for stock engine config. Have maybe 4psi over 6k, if the boost scales 1 to 1. This should keep us from needing new clutch,cooling,fuel mods. Fitment would be easy if you ran a CAI, or some slight piping work to use the stock airbox. The alt charger could just be another controller and could control the second compressor. Both could be hooked up to the same throttle switch for activation. All that would leave is the need for a dump 2.0. 1 dump pack for each compressor, or if It will fit; two 1.5's. I realize this is getting really expensive and outside the purpose for the phantom kit, but I can't help but think about the upgrade path of the ESC. I don't know if the OFT could tune for that type of setup, but think about it, double(theoretically) the boost acrost the range for an extra $1600. If you already have a 2.0dump and OFT. ok bored rant over, commence crushing my dreams.

User Name		Remember Me?
Password