OpenFlash Manager v1.08.3 now available for download (FLKC)

[Triumphrider]

Haha I'm thanks... Shows how new I am to this stuff.

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

[Carlitoz3]

Originally Posted by Luckrider

You aren't kidding. I have been paying very specific attention to my driving and the performance of the car since I am going to be racing at the Wicked Big Meet on the 8th and I feel two distinct (but small) bumps in power. One where the cam phasing is and one higher up at the top. I am more focused on the feel than the numbers though.

So which tune are you running?

[Luckrider]

Originally Posted by Carlitoz3

So which tune are you running?

Stage 2 EL e85 on a totally stock car (just the tune, wheels, and tires).

[SCHN3LL]

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

Yes, BPB and E85 isn't a really good match since the BPB take away from top end power (above 6500rpm). And that is were E85 maps really shine!

Just placed an order for the OFT, can't wait!

Great to hear shiv, I was on the fence getting the BPBs with the tune but I have e85 a couple blocks away...

[ScionFrsFan]

This might sound crazy since I don't know a damn thing when it comes to creating tunes.
Is there anyway to provide more power down low power (E85) with the trade off of losing power up high? I'm guessing if that was possible, someone would of already done it lol.

PS: Is there any discussion on making the E85 maps "stronger" or are they already topped off?

[steve99]

Originally Posted by ScionFrsFan

This might sound crazy since I don't know a damn thing when it comes to creating tunes.
Is there anyway to provide more power down low power (E85) with the trade off of losing power up high? I'm guessing if that was possible, someone would of already done it lol.

PS: Is there any discussion on making the E85 maps "stronger" or are they already topped off?

If you are not already running headers that will give a bit more torque midrange, uel headers seem slightly better at low midrange torque than el headers but el generally produce slighty more top end power.

Billet poer blocks BPB, will bring your peak power a bit lower in rpm range and a bit more midrange but they dont work well with FI or E85.

E85 already provides more torque throught rpm range due to ability to run more ignition advance on that fuel.

Even though OFT tunes are off the shelf one size fits all they seem to perform well even when compared to custom tunes or people who have opted for custom e tune

Their is maybe a few percent extra to be gained in places and maybe tidy up maf scale and lean it out slightly ,clean up bit of knock on some fuels but no big gains to be had.

Rule of thumb with these cars seems to be NA plus full bolt ons and tune will net you maybe 35 wheel horsepower on E85 maybe 25 on good petrol.

If you want more FI is the way to go

There is just no big gain NA

[ScionFrsFan]

Originally Posted by steve99

If you are not already running headers that will give a bit more torque midrange, uel headers seem slightly better at low midrange torque than el headers but el generally produce slighty more top end power.

Billet poer blocks BPB, will bring your peak power a bit lower in rpm range and a bit more midrange but they dont work well with FI or E85.

E85 already provides more torque throught rpm range due to ability to run more ignition advance on that fuel.

Even though OFT tunes are off the shelf one size fits all they seem to perform well even when compared to custom tunes or people who have opted for custom e tune

Their is maybe a few percent extra to be gained in places and maybe tidy up maf scale and lean it out slightly ,clean up bit of knock on some fuels but no big gains to be had.

Rule of thumb with these cars seems to be NA plus full bolt ons and tune will net you maybe 35 wheel horsepower on E85 maybe 25 on good petrol.

If you want more FI is the way to go

There is just no big gain NA

Thank You! Very informative!

[wparsons]

Any ETA on v1.6 tune release date?

[mid_life_crisis]

Much as part of me was thrilled to learn that you are working on this, it's been a week now. Stop announcing this stuff when it's still so far away damnit!

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

In v1.60, we have made the following changes:

-Added support for A01F ROM
-Extensively revised Stage 1 mapping (new MAF scaling, new fuel mapping, new ignition mapping, tweaked VVT mapping)
-Revised Stage 2 (revised ignition mapping)
-Added both 91 an 93 oct map variants
-No changes to E85 maps at this time.

By the time the v1.60 maps are released, there may be a few more changes. But that is all for now

[TM]

Can't wait til this is out, just so I know shiv will be one step closer to working on the Phantom ESC e85 tune.

[rickjames]

Originally Posted by mid_life_crisis

Much as part of me was thrilled to learn that you are working on this, it's been a week now. Stop announcing this stuff when it's still so far away damnit!

I think all our whinging scared off Shiv

[phobos512]

Folks, be patient. @shiv@vishnu's not going to let us down.

[mid_life_crisis]

Originally Posted by phobos512

Folks, be patient. @shiv@vishnu's not going to let us down.

Oh, we have complete faith that he'll do as he says. We just want him to stop teasing. I'd personally much prefer "look what I did!" to "sometime in the foreseeable future, I'll have this ready."

[Boofneenee]

Taking advantage of the new flkc data logging feature.

Here in this log I see flkc occurs on the highway at a certain rpm.

http://www.datazap.me/u/boofneenee/s...og=0&data=1-12

I typically get some knock correction on the highways so I believe it makes sense to see some flkc, or does it?

Also, watch has my advanced mult. progresses its way back to 1.0. I just flashed over to E85 for the first time and I am really enjoying the drive. No tq dip is fun!

* hmm.. it appears that I did not get the most recent patch to properly display the flkc. *