follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-20-2014, 11:19 AM   #43
xwd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 861 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I've only ridden in a car but it definitely had improved acceleration everywhere, it really does feel like driving a larger displacement car. It definitely has a bit more torque than the stock car above 2000RPM. I wouldn't really focus on the peak HP gain so much as the full powerband. A good 93 tune around here from someone like TopSpeed would probably get you 240WHP which is a good 70WHP over stock.
xwd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 11:31 AM   #44
regal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S/Toyota Yaris
Location: PA
Posts: 1,438
Thanks: 21
Thanked 316 Times in 232 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wtsheff View Post
I have been viewing the various threads related to the innovate supercharger and I am still undecided what to do. I use my car for delivery in town and mainly wanted more instant acceleration from 0 to 30 mph in addition to eliminating the dreaded torque dip around 4000 RPMs.
After reading this report from Edmunds, I am discouraged even more about spending thousands of dollars for the advertised upgraded power. Somehow they were only able to gain an additional 40 hp from the aftermarket kit. I am sure the car was only running on premium instead of the E85 fuel (along with no IC), but the 0 to 30 MPH times were actually slightly higher than the OEM NA configuration. Also, I do not have a E85 station in close proximity to my house in Atlanta.
I also viewed a Innovate BRZ YouTube video where the driver pretty much corroborated the lack of improved acceleration in the sub 3500 rpm range. I am sure I would love the power in the higher RPM's, but driving around town I would rarely be able to enjoy it.
Can someone please convince me that my research is flawed and the low-end torque is substantially improved once the kit is installed properly with the addition of the intercooler.

Thanks in advance.

I came back to edit this post after reading about the new Innovate 210+ kit and 335 kit. Maybe I should just keep waiting until these new kits become available and perfected in the US.

http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...ck-tested.html



IMHO the intercooled kit needs a bigger blower to be worth it and only for the track. The nice thing about the S1 kit is that it only adds a modertate hp but makes the torque dip disappear.


The last thing I want to do to this car is subject it to 300whp, I just don't have confidence in the rod bearings and other things.


The S1 Innovate would have been just the perfect upgrade if it weren't for all the issues. Those centri charger IMHO are for track racing, they don't boost the low end torque like a pos disp. blower. Slam me all you want but I just don't think this engine was built to rev and add a cent blower and I wouldn't be comfortable with it as a daily.


But the non intercooled innovate had appeal. Fairly simple (less to go wrong), I've had pos disp blowers last 130k miles, engine and all fine when I sold it. But I have to admit reading the other thread doesn't give one a sense that quality was top priority. Innovate of course doesn't make the blower, that's a quality piece. Its the integration, low grade bolts for example that bother me.


And I would be delighted if I never saw another post with E85 mentions. Here it is not sold, I would love to know how many owners actually live, drive their car to work every day, and can conveniently fill up with E85? 1%,10%?


I have a hunch that the intercooled version is a bit of a gimmick, doubt that the difference would be noticed daily driving unless you like jail. Seems you would really have to get on it for extended runs to make a big difference, I know look at the dynos. Dynos can be made to show about whatever you want.
__________________
2013 FRS Argento Silver 6MT

Mods:
Clear fender side lights
Tactrix ZA1JB01C 2014 Calib
regal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to regal For This Useful Post:
86-tundra (03-20-2014)
Old 03-20-2014, 11:33 AM   #45
King Tut
NASA SpecE30 Racer
 
King Tut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2006 Honda S2000
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 7,279
Thanks: 607
Thanked 5,759 Times in 3,055 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
Tagged: 10 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to King Tut
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acree View Post
How about a thread for those who are thinking about those who are thinking about buying one?
That is called the FBM Owner's thread.
__________________
King Tut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 11:52 AM   #46
xxscaxx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ
Location: New York
Posts: 2,240
Thanks: 458
Thanked 878 Times in 556 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by regal View Post
IMHO the intercooled kit needs a bigger blower to be worth it and only for the track. The nice thing about the S1 kit is that it only adds a modertate hp but makes the torque dip disappear.


The last thing I want to do to this car is subject it to 300whp, I just don't have confidence in the rod bearings and other things.


The S1 Innovate would have been just the perfect upgrade if it weren't for all the issues. Those centri charger IMHO are for track racing, they don't boost the low end torque like a pos disp. blower. Slam me all you want but I just don't think this engine was built to rev and add a cent blower and I wouldn't be comfortable with it as a daily.


But the non intercooled innovate had appeal. Fairly simple (less to go wrong), I've had pos disp blowers last 130k miles, engine and all fine when I sold it. But I have to admit reading the other thread doesn't give one a sense that quality was top priority. Innovate of course doesn't make the blower, that's a quality piece. Its the integration, low grade bolts for example that bother me.


And I would be delighted if I never saw another post with E85 mentions. Here it is not sold, I would love to know how many owners actually live, drive their car to work every day, and can conveniently fill up with E85? 1%,10%?


I have a hunch that the intercooled version is a bit of a gimmick, doubt that the difference would be noticed daily driving unless you like jail. Seems you would really have to get on it for extended runs to make a big difference, I know look at the dynos. Dynos can be made to show about whatever you want.
Though it may be on e85, there is a big difference in the intercooled/non intercooled numbers on it. Not exactly sure about 93, but from what i've seen and read its a 30whp' ish difference.

I have an e85 station I pass everyday. I plan on going flex fuel, as it isn't COMPLETELY convenient, since its the only e85 station in my area. Last thing I want to do is map switch, rather just have flex fuel and can fill up with whatever I want.

The whole reason I went with the intercooled kit is for consistency. With the non-intercooled kit, on a hot day you can feel the power slowly tapering off as you run the car for a longer period of time.

I am not saying its acceptable, but I am really just shocked at the amount of people who keep mentioning the supercharger bolts.

Mine were completely fine until I removed the charger to install the intercooler. Only 2 had broke, the rest are fine, which could have been me just overtightening them. They don't have a very high tq rating.
xxscaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 01:26 PM   #47
mikalem
Senior Member
 
mikalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2020 DGM BRZ Limited
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 351
Thanks: 216
Thanked 147 Times in 97 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I've had the non-ic blower installed now for around a week so here's my thoughts on it - it's really all going to be in the tune, and how "happy" the car is. I have a flex fuel setup, but ran pump 93 for a few tanks just to make sure the tune was happy - I don't have the stock carb approved tune (can't speak for the videos you saw). I just started putting E85 into the car and while it seems to wake it up more, pump 93 was very good too. Attached is a compare of data from when the car was NA on E85, vs. SC Pump 93 - I wouldn't pay much attention to the actual numbers, however the conditions these two logs were in were similar - same road, same direction, same car, about the same amount of fuel, same tires, same driver, etc.

In short expect to spend a little time with the tuner, but the car is capable of what you want really - you just need to give the feedback. That being said, the tune I currently have I typically need to let it warm up before I get the solid acceleration off the line - if you try it when the engine is cold, or the AM hasn't had a chance to rise it hesitates a little (My tune defaults to .85 on startup). Once warmed up properly though I haven't had the problem.

HTH!

Quote:
Originally Posted by wtsheff View Post
I have been viewing the various threads related to the innovate supercharger and I am still undecided what to do. I use my car for delivery in town and mainly wanted more instant acceleration from 0 to 30 mph in addition to eliminating the dreaded torque dip around 4000 RPMs.
After reading this report from Edmunds, I am discouraged even more about spending thousands of dollars for the advertised upgraded power. Somehow they were only able to gain an additional 40 hp from the aftermarket kit. I am sure the car was only running on premium instead of the E85 fuel (along with no IC), but the 0 to 30 MPH times were actually slightly higher than the OEM NA configuration. Also, I do not have a E85 station in close proximity to my house in Atlanta.
I also viewed a Innovate BRZ YouTube video where the driver pretty much corroborated the lack of improved acceleration in the sub 3500 rpm range. I am sure I would love the power in the higher RPM's, but driving around town I would rarely be able to enjoy it.
Can someone please convince me that my research is flawed and the low-end torque is substantially improved once the kit is installed properly with the addition of the intercooler.

Thanks in advance.

I came back to edit this post after reading about the new Innovate 210+ kit and 335 kit. Maybe I should just keep waiting until these new kits become available and perfected in the US.

http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...ck-tested.html
Attached Images
 
mikalem is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How are the p&l equal headers thinking about buying them Anthony7515 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 1 11-30-2013 12:23 PM
Anybody else thinking about buying crawfords rebuilt motor and turbo? Frsexxxy Forced Induction 21 05-29-2013 05:07 AM
Thinking of Buying -- Scion Dealer Suggestions? rba New England 15 03-31-2013 10:09 AM
Thinking about buying a red car for V-Day? Look what made the list. Saab2Frs Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 3 02-14-2013 06:51 PM
Thinking of Buying either MR-2 Spyder or an AP1 S2000 FT///R86 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 33 12-29-2011 01:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.