follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-13-2010, 09:36 AM   #43
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NESW20 View Post
power production has zero, nada, nothing, zilch, to do with cylinder layout. NOTHING.

head, intake, and exhaust design make power.


UGH.

-Mike
Revolutions also do, hence one could argue because of revolution limitations in certain configurations, power production can be affected.








Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2010, 11:24 AM   #44
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,059
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 19,288 Times in 8,393 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NESW20 View Post
power production has zero, nada, nothing, zilch, to do with cylinder layout. NOTHING.

head, intake, and exhaust design make power.


UGH.

-Mike
Comp ratio make power difference too. Look up JP s2k & US/EURO s2k. One of the main difference in the engine is comp ratio (11.7:1 vs 11:1). Because of that, it lost 10hp. s2k owners here correct me, if I'm wrong.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2010, 02:35 PM   #45
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
^ Technically, it increases torque.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2010, 02:42 PM   #46
Franisco
Senior Member
 
Franisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: D31a
Location: 360
Posts: 502
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Ok, I guess I understand now. Somehow I don't see Porsche teaming up with Toyota anytime soon haha
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
No one's buying a Yaris to wind the piss out of it and possibly slam into a mountainside pretending they're the ultimate Tofu delivery person.
Franisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2010, 06:25 PM   #47
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,059
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 19,288 Times in 8,393 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
^ Technically, it increases torque.
I think, you and me are both correct. Here's US & JP ver s2k spec (AP1)
Comp Ratio: 11:1 vs 11.7:1
HP: 237bhp vs 247bhp
tq: 207N-m vs 218N-m


Quote:
Originally Posted by Franisco View Post
Ok, I guess I understand now. Somehow I don't see Porsche teaming up with Toyota anytime soon haha
Oh, I agree w ya on that one.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2010, 11:04 PM   #48
bigbcraig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: 2013 BRZ / 2015 WRX
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 232
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NESW20 View Post
power production has zero, nada, nothing, zilch, to do with cylinder layout. NOTHING.

head, intake, and exhaust design make power.


UGH.

-Mike

Compression ratio and revs are head design. (ok yes piston; but otherwise come on)


*sigh*We've been over this before. Subaru doesn't really make any NA performance engines - and as such aren't comparable. Boxers have just as much potential as any other engine, its just differences in packaging and balance.
If you want performance boxers, Testarossa and Porsche are two quick&easy examples.
bigbcraig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2010, 11:53 PM   #49
Lexicon101
Inexperienced
 
Lexicon101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: Crappy old '90 civic. Frankie.
Location: In the club
Posts: 622
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbcraig View Post

Compression ratio and revs are head design. (ok yes piston; but otherwise come on)


*sigh*We've been over this before. Subaru doesn't really make any NA performance engines - and as such aren't comparable. Boxers have just as much potential as any other engine, its just differences in packaging and balance.
If you want performance boxers, Testarossa and Porsche are two quick&easy examples.
About that bolded part... You sure about that?
There are a lot of different kinds of engines.
Lexicon101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2010, 01:00 PM   #50
enc0re
Senior Member
 
enc0re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: BMW 325i (E46)
Location: Michigan
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franisco View Post
Ok, I guess I understand now. Somehow I don't see Porsche teaming up with Toyota anytime soon haha
You realize that Toyota and Porsche had a memorandum of understanding in 1990, right? Toyota taught Porsche the entire Toyota Production System and was instrumental in its turnaround. There's a reason Porsche has the fewest flaws per 100 new vehicles, ahead of Lexus.
enc0re is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2010, 01:10 PM   #51
enc0re
Senior Member
 
enc0re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: BMW 325i (E46)
Location: Michigan
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
^ What Shevon said. Supra is...was Toyota's flagship sports car. The IS-F is Lexus' entry model sports sedan. The Land Cruiser starts @ $69K doesn't it? More than an RX or GX.
Landcruiser $66K -> Lexus LX $77K
Sequoia $39K -> Lexus GX $52K
Highlander $26K -> Lexus RX $38K

The same holds true for all shared Lexus/Toyota vehicles. If Toyota were to make a new Supra, it would almost certainly be a V6. Therefore, it would share chassis with the IS350. So we'd be looking at a little over $30K for a base Supra.

Perhaps Toyota would want to balls to the wall and drop 400+hp in the Supra. In that case, they would certainly use the 3UR-GSE V8. That means a $50K Supra. Toyota would not price a Supra above a Lexus with the same motor. This is marketing 101.
enc0re is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2010, 03:06 PM   #52
Dark
Elite Padawan
 
Dark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: '15 WRX, 15 GLA250, and 2 feet
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 3,498
Thanks: 197
Thanked 250 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by enc0re View Post
Landcruiser $66K -> Lexus LX $77K
Sequoia $39K -> Lexus GX $52K
Highlander $26K -> Lexus RX $38K

The same holds true for all shared Lexus/Toyota vehicles. If Toyota were to make a new Supra, it would almost certainly be a V6. Therefore, it would share chassis with the IS350. So we'd be looking at a little over $30K for a base Supra.

Perhaps Toyota would want to balls to the wall and drop 400+hp in the Supra. In that case, they would certainly use the 3UR-GSE V8. That means a $50K Supra. Toyota would not price a Supra above a Lexus with the same motor. This is marketing 101.
But Sequoia is twin bro of Tundra. GX is twin bro of Land Cruiser Prado.

EDIT: I don't think Toyota will use the same motor because they need to meet to regulation is a few years ahead. They will tune up the engine or design a new one.
Dark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2010, 03:22 PM   #53
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,059
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 19,288 Times in 8,393 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by enc0re View Post
Landcruiser $66K -> Lexus LX $77K
Sequoia $39K -> Lexus GX $52K
Highlander $26K -> Lexus RX $38K

The same holds true for all shared Lexus/Toyota vehicles. If Toyota were to make a new Supra, it would almost certainly be a V6. Therefore, it would share chassis with the IS350. So we'd be looking at a little over $30K for a base Supra.

Perhaps Toyota would want to balls to the wall and drop 400+hp in the Supra. In that case, they would certainly use the 3UR-GSE V8. That means a $50K Supra. Toyota would not price a Supra above a Lexus with the same motor. This is marketing 101.
Hm... I don't know bout that. I can't really see new Supra price tag to be around $30k. $50k~$60k is more believable to me. Specially Toyota knows that they cannot mess w the Supra name and Supra's history.

Just say Toyota made new Supra w v6 twin turbo pushing 488hp/441tq weighting bout 3200~3800lbs and starting price around $52k~$62k. Bout $20k cheaper than GT-R, but pressing bout same amount of hp/tq. Bout same price tag as M3 series, it'll be perfect for comparison.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2010, 08:24 PM   #54
2jz-gte4life
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: 1995 Toyota Supra
Location: Toronto
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
I really hope Toyota makes another Supra, it's been too long of a wait.

Perhaps they are secretly making one but are trying to perfect it.

The new GTR "skyline", has come out, now there's rumors that a new rx-7 may come out, maybe this will get the ball rolling.
__________________
2jz-gte4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2010, 10:14 PM   #55
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,059
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 19,288 Times in 8,393 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2jz-gte4life View Post
I really hope Toyota makes another Supra, it's been too long of a wait.

Perhaps they are secretly making one but are trying to perfect it.

The new GTR "skyline", has come out, now there's rumors that a new rx-7 may come out, maybe this will get the ball rolling.
Don't get your hopes up til this FT86c come to production and goes well... so looking at another 5~10yrs (that's my opinion anyways).
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2010, 11:38 PM   #56
bigbcraig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: 2013 BRZ / 2015 WRX
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 232
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexicon101 View Post
About that bolded part... You sure about that?
There are a lot of different kinds of engines.
Well, given the lack of explanation of what you're asking, so I'll just assume you're being pedantic. And I'll still hold to what I said.

Boxers have just as much potential as any other format of traditional otto-cycle engine. period.
bigbcraig is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SUPRA Musings... Axel Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 8 12-30-2009 12:56 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.