follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-17-2013, 01:23 AM   #15
jflogerzi
Senior Member
 
jflogerzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Series 10 6MT FR-S
Location: Moreno Valley, CA
Posts: 5,565
Thanks: 2,013
Thanked 2,043 Times in 1,474 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmong337 View Post
The mod that will make your most gains would be a tune... depending on tuner of course. I'd do an OpenFlash Tablet and see how much you can extract. Better yet, there are already stage 1 maps you can upload. That's the only mod I see worth getting in the early quest for power as you can continue to tune it and tweak it. Whereas an intake, exhaust, and header would just resort to a storage bin later when going turbo.

Fa20club turbo kit seems to be the bang for the buck from what I see on the market presently. If you got the skills, making you own custom kit would be the way to go.

Turbo is like a 100whp increase. Worth saving for imo; versus doing i/h/e +tune, then having to redo everything over when you turbo... Doing a proper i/h/e/tune still will set you back a decent chunk.of coin that, imo, would be better off putting towards a turbo system.

That my $0.02
While true, If OP goes the SC route, the headers can stay. Or in the case of the FA20club turbo, he can get there EL Header and reuse when buying the turbo and get a discount as well
jflogerzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 01:59 AM   #16
Grymm86
Senior Member
 
Grymm86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: BRZ Limited DGM
Location: United States
Posts: 112
Thanks: 96
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Garage
for 30hp increase, go E85 if you can.
Grymm86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:05 AM   #17
Fast_Freddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Passat
Location: East Coast
Posts: 626
Thanks: 331
Thanked 188 Times in 130 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Hmmm... if you believe the manufacturer and vendor claims:

Header = +10-20whp
Over-pipe = +3-4whp
Front pipe = +5-10whp
Cat-back = +10-15whp
Drop-in air filter = +5whp
Silicone intake tube = +3-4whp
Light Crank pulley = +3-4whp
Stage 2 Tune = +20whp
------------------------------------------

Total = 59-82whp!!!

or +25whp on a dyno in the real world.
Fast_Freddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fast_Freddy For This Useful Post:
RC51ed (10-18-2013)
Old 10-17-2013, 04:51 AM   #18
FR-Sizzle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: brz
Location: San Dieg
Posts: 245
Thanks: 30
Thanked 84 Times in 52 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy View Post
Hmmm... if you believe the manufacturer and vendor claims:

Header = +10-20whp
Over-pipe = +3-4whp
Front pipe = +5-10whp
Cat-back = +10-15whp
Drop-in air filter = +5whp
Silicone intake tube = +3-4whp
Light Crank pulley = +3-4whp
Stage 2 Tune = +20whp
------------------------------------------

Total = 59-82whp!!!

or +25whp on a dyno in the real world.
Dont forget a fat wing and stickers for another 20. Oh and a rusted hood for another 30 for that aerodynamics shitzz
FR-Sizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 10:03 AM   #19
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Freddy View Post
Hmmm... if you believe the manufacturer and vendor claims:

Header = +10-20whp
Over-pipe = +3-4whp
Front pipe = +5-10whp
Cat-back = +10-15whp
Drop-in air filter = +5whp
Silicone intake tube = +3-4whp
Light Crank pulley = +3-4whp
Stage 2 Tune = +20whp
------------------------------------------

Total = 59-82whp!!!

or +25whp on a dyno in the real world.
The problem is that they don't always claim the hp gain at the hp peak, but the biggest gain at some point in the RPM range. So a part might add 5whp at 6000rpm, but only 1whp at the actual peak.

More important than the peak number is area under the curve, reducing (or eliminating) the torque dip makes a huge difference in daily driving, and having a wide flat torque curve is much faster than something with a very narrow peaky torque curve.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 10:37 AM   #20
Gary in NJ
Senior Member
 
Gary in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: WR Blue BRZ, 240Z
Location: Amongst the twisty roads
Posts: 587
Thanks: 21
Thanked 412 Times in 206 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
People always say they want more horsepower, when in fact what they desire is more torque. And it's where the torque is added that counts. If I want to look sexy on the dyno, sure give 500 hp. But for a car I'm gonna drive everyday, I'll take steady dose of torque, the sooner the better.
__________________
Phantom ESC, ECUtek Tune, Nameless Front Pipe & Axle Back, Enkei RS+M 17x8 et35, OEM+Ref


Gary in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 11:05 AM   #21
FR-S Matt
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary in NJ View Post
People always say they want more horsepower, when in fact what they desire is more torque. And it's where the torque is added that counts. If I want to look sexy on the dyno, sure give 500 hp. But for a car I'm gonna drive everyday, I'll take steady dose of torque, the sooner the better.
My girlfriend just got a Dart with the 1.4L turbo. That car has 184 ft lbs of torque with that tiny engine! You are absolutely right. I love torque.
FR-S Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 12:58 PM   #22
ML
Senior Member
 
ML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 13 White MT FR-S
Location: Gastonia, NC
Posts: 1,848
Thanks: 980
Thanked 1,156 Times in 529 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Garage
Swap the final gear and you can just FEEL like you got 30hp
__________________


Build Thread https://www.instagram.com/mount_tele_lion/
Quote:
Originally Posted by Symbiont View Post
I swear I will punch your car if you put these on. Right in the face.
ML is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ML For This Useful Post:
ftc~brz (10-17-2013), IAmNotTheDriftKing (10-17-2013), juliog (11-04-2013)
Old 10-17-2013, 01:18 PM   #23
Jason@DSG
Senior Member
 
Jason@DSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 1997 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
Location: US/Canada
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 589
Thanked 431 Times in 266 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
In my experience a single mod doesn't really do that much. Most manufacturer claims are on un-tuned cars. I've seen intakes claim to make +16.8whp/12wtq then when the car gets tuned, make 2.1whp/-3wtq!!

For example, if you do just a cat-back, while yes it will reduce some back-pressure, the catalytic converter is always the most restrictive OEM component on any exhaust system. You could have a 3" full cat-back, but it's only as good the flow from the engine. The sound will be great, but power won't be greatly increased.

BUT, if you do a full line, or at least front pipe + cat-back, now you've definitely increased the flow. Throw the under pipe on there, and headers, that will make a huge difference. The entire line from the engine is non-restrictive and those manufacturer claims will be a lot more accurate.

Then to compliment that add an intake. Typically any car doing a full exhaust line + intake will yield noticeable differences. Sadly, you can't expect to feel or notice any gains from a $40 panel filter only while the rest of the components are restrictive.

Another mod that I find makes a HUGE difference are lightweight wheels. Every 1lb. of rotational mass that's removed = the same as 10lbs. removed of the car. Changing the flywheel/carbon drive shaft/rims on my car was a total of 55lbs. of rotational mass removed. That's roughly the equivalent if I were to take 550lbs. out of my car. You wouldn't believe how much more responsive it was...I couldn't believe it!

So to summarize, one small mod won't make a difference. But a couple, still staying within a reasonable budget, can definitely make a difference but they have to work together.
Jason@DSG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason@DSG For This Useful Post:
muffinz (10-21-2013)
Old 10-17-2013, 01:33 PM   #24
Jason@DSG
Senior Member
 
Jason@DSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 1997 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
Location: US/Canada
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 589
Thanked 431 Times in 266 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FR-S Matt View Post
My girlfriend just got a Dart with the 1.4L turbo. That car has 184 ft lbs of torque with that tiny engine! You are absolutely right. I love torque.
But hp numbers are equally important for performance, and depending on application. For example, a truck needs more torque and less power since the gearing is designed to do "work" rather than "rate of work".

Torque is great to give you that off the line power and push you forward. However, horsepower is the only way for you to use that torque. Torque is a unit of 'work'. You can make torque without actually moving. Once the torque is used for something, it's called 'work' measured in ft-lb like on a car. If your engine/car mass/gearbox don't require much torque to "work", you can use much more of the horsepower for actual power, or rate of work. Basically, taking the "work" your engine can do and how fast of a rate it can work at.

Trucks with huge gearboxes designed to haul massive amounts of weight at low rpm, need a ton of torque to turn the heavy-duty driveshafts and gears, but don't need much horsepower since they don't need to do this "Work" at a really fast pace. That's why most race cars have high HP, but lower torque. The lightweight gearbox, driveshaft and low car weight require very little "work" from the engine to move it. Therefore, the higher HP can use the torque (even if a lower amount) at a much faster rate.

Too much torque on a car that doesn't need it just ends up being a burnout machine and terrible on the track.

I have an AWD car with a ton of components to turn like front and rear diffs, transaxles, twin-clutch transmission, relatively heavy car so I need a lot of torque to get all those parts moving. Then high HP to still have power.

It's something for you guys to consider seeing your cars are RWD.
Jason@DSG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jason@DSG For This Useful Post:
CK_Bladesmith (10-21-2013), davidchoi (11-17-2013), FR-S Matt (10-17-2013), Jrohit (10-18-2013), muffinz (10-21-2013)
Old 10-17-2013, 03:17 PM   #25
Figo
Senior Member
 
Figo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Vortech Supercharged FR-S
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 1,515
Thanks: 597
Thanked 934 Times in 428 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
TRD sticker on windshield + 15whp;
Sti tuning sticker on fuse box cover +5whp;
T emblem on trunk +20whp;

Only +40whp. so I think you might need a drop in filter, a catback, and a EL header for the other +10.
__________________
I'd rather lose by a mile because I built my own car,
than win by an inch because someone else built it for me.
Your car is your story, so don't let someone else write the book.

( White Tiger ) - FiGo's 車誌.
Figo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Figo For This Useful Post:
Obja (11-16-2013)
Old 10-17-2013, 03:23 PM   #26
Jason@DSG
Senior Member
 
Jason@DSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 1997 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
Location: US/Canada
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 589
Thanked 431 Times in 266 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Figo View Post
TRD sticker on windshield + 15whp;
Sti tuning sticker on fuse box cover +5whp;
T emblem on trunk +20whp;

Only +40whp. so I think you might need a drop in filter, a catback, and a EL header for the other +10.
Haha!
Jason@DSG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 04:03 PM   #27
Circuit Motorsports
Senior Member
 
Circuit Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 4,353
Thanks: 294
Thanked 495 Times in 259 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Circuit Motorsports
Best way to achieve 20-30whp would be:

`Good quality EL header + Front pipe & Overpipe + Catback

`Intake

`Ecutek custom tune.

Actual power gains will depend on octane used, altitude, car variables etc., but this will get you really close to your goals while staying N/A.

We got 17whp on a basically stock car, factory exhausts all the way to the muffler, no intake on 93 octane.

Feel free to PM us fi you want some more help or info

-Tristan
Circuit Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2013, 09:23 AM   #28
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,012 Times in 2,098 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@DSG View Post
Another mod that I find makes a HUGE difference are lightweight wheels. Every 1lb. of rotational mass that's removed = the same as 10lbs. removed of the car. Changing the flywheel/carbon drive shaft/rims on my car was a total of 55lbs. of rotational mass removed. That's roughly the equivalent if I were to take 550lbs. out of my car. You wouldn't believe how much more responsive it was...I couldn't believe it!
10:1 for rotational mass is often repeated, but it's a GROSS exaggeration.
Removing 1 lb. of wheel mass will improve acceleration more than removing 1 lb. of non-rotational mass, but the effective ratio is more like 1.4, not 10. For tires, it's about 1.9x.
It will be a different factor for the driveshaft and a different factor again for the flywheel, and those factors will depend on what gear you're in as well (bigger effect in lower gears).

*IF* removing 55 lb. of rotational mass is really the same as removing 550 lb., you would be good for about 102mph in the 1/4 with the stock 200hp. But that ain't happenin...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
CK_Bladesmith (10-21-2013), Team STILLEN (10-19-2013)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding Coolant JLMtm Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 5 05-11-2013 07:03 AM
Sensible Mods Adding Value to FR-S/BRZ? Braces Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 24 11-12-2012 10:32 PM
Adding a sub enclosure yet ? rikdrt1 Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 10 06-08-2012 09:28 PM
Adding navi to FRS Pake1 Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 9 06-04-2012 10:14 AM
Adding Navi to the FRS? Pake1 Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 3 06-01-2012 01:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.