|
||||||
| Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Series 10 6MT FR-S
Location: Moreno Valley, CA
Posts: 5,565
Thanks: 2,013
Thanked 2,043 Times in 1,474 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Passat
Location: East Coast
Posts: 626
Thanks: 331
Thanked 188 Times in 130 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
|
Hmmm... if you believe the manufacturer and vendor claims:
Header = +10-20whp Over-pipe = +3-4whp Front pipe = +5-10whp Cat-back = +10-15whp Drop-in air filter = +5whp Silicone intake tube = +3-4whp Light Crank pulley = +3-4whp Stage 2 Tune = +20whp ------------------------------------------ Total = 59-82whp!!! or +25whp on a dyno in the real world. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Fast_Freddy For This Useful Post: | RC51ed (10-18-2013) |
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: brz
Location: San Dieg
Posts: 245
Thanks: 30
Thanked 84 Times in 52 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
|
Quote:
More important than the peak number is area under the curve, reducing (or eliminating) the torque dip makes a huge difference in daily driving, and having a wide flat torque curve is much faster than something with a very narrow peaky torque curve.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak... flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: WR Blue BRZ, 240Z
Location: Amongst the twisty roads
Posts: 587
Thanks: 21
Thanked 412 Times in 206 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
|
People always say they want more horsepower, when in fact what they desire is more torque. And it's where the torque is added that counts. If I want to look sexy on the dyno, sure give 500 hp. But for a car I'm gonna drive everyday, I'll take steady dose of torque, the sooner the better.
__________________
Phantom ESC, ECUtek Tune, Nameless Front Pipe & Axle Back, Enkei RS+M 17x8 et35, OEM+Ref
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 13 White MT FR-S
Location: Gastonia, NC
Posts: 1,848
Thanks: 980
Thanked 1,156 Times in 529 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
|
Swap the final gear and you can just FEEL like you got 30hp
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ML For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 1997 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
Location: US/Canada
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 589
Thanked 431 Times in 266 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
|
In my experience a single mod doesn't really do that much. Most manufacturer claims are on un-tuned cars. I've seen intakes claim to make +16.8whp/12wtq then when the car gets tuned, make 2.1whp/-3wtq!!
For example, if you do just a cat-back, while yes it will reduce some back-pressure, the catalytic converter is always the most restrictive OEM component on any exhaust system. You could have a 3" full cat-back, but it's only as good the flow from the engine. The sound will be great, but power won't be greatly increased. BUT, if you do a full line, or at least front pipe + cat-back, now you've definitely increased the flow. Throw the under pipe on there, and headers, that will make a huge difference. The entire line from the engine is non-restrictive and those manufacturer claims will be a lot more accurate. Then to compliment that add an intake. Typically any car doing a full exhaust line + intake will yield noticeable differences. Sadly, you can't expect to feel or notice any gains from a $40 panel filter only while the rest of the components are restrictive. Another mod that I find makes a HUGE difference are lightweight wheels. Every 1lb. of rotational mass that's removed = the same as 10lbs. removed of the car. Changing the flywheel/carbon drive shaft/rims on my car was a total of 55lbs. of rotational mass removed. That's roughly the equivalent if I were to take 550lbs. out of my car. You wouldn't believe how much more responsive it was...I couldn't believe it! So to summarize, one small mod won't make a difference. But a couple, still staying within a reasonable budget, can definitely make a difference but they have to work together. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jason@DSG For This Useful Post: | muffinz (10-21-2013) |
|
|
#24 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 1997 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
Location: US/Canada
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 589
Thanked 431 Times in 266 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Torque is great to give you that off the line power and push you forward. However, horsepower is the only way for you to use that torque. Torque is a unit of 'work'. You can make torque without actually moving. Once the torque is used for something, it's called 'work' measured in ft-lb like on a car. If your engine/car mass/gearbox don't require much torque to "work", you can use much more of the horsepower for actual power, or rate of work. Basically, taking the "work" your engine can do and how fast of a rate it can work at. Trucks with huge gearboxes designed to haul massive amounts of weight at low rpm, need a ton of torque to turn the heavy-duty driveshafts and gears, but don't need much horsepower since they don't need to do this "Work" at a really fast pace. That's why most race cars have high HP, but lower torque. The lightweight gearbox, driveshaft and low car weight require very little "work" from the engine to move it. Therefore, the higher HP can use the torque (even if a lower amount) at a much faster rate. Too much torque on a car that doesn't need it just ends up being a burnout machine and terrible on the track. I have an AWD car with a ton of components to turn like front and rear diffs, transaxles, twin-clutch transmission, relatively heavy car so I need a lot of torque to get all those parts moving. Then high HP to still have power. It's something for you guys to consider seeing your cars are RWD. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jason@DSG For This Useful Post: | CK_Bladesmith (10-21-2013), davidchoi (11-17-2013), FR-S Matt (10-17-2013), Jrohit (10-18-2013), muffinz (10-21-2013) |
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Vortech Supercharged FR-S
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 1,515
Thanks: 597
Thanked 934 Times in 428 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
|
TRD sticker on windshield + 15whp;
Sti tuning sticker on fuse box cover +5whp; T emblem on trunk +20whp; Only +40whp. so I think you might need a drop in filter, a catback, and a EL header for the other +10.
__________________
I'd rather lose by a mile because I built my own car,
than win by an inch because someone else built it for me. Your car is your story, so don't let someone else write the book. ( White Tiger ) - FiGo's 車誌. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Figo For This Useful Post: | Obja (11-16-2013) |
|
|
#26 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 1997 Eagle Talon TSi AWD
Location: US/Canada
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 589
Thanked 431 Times in 266 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Senior Member
|
Best way to achieve 20-30whp would be:
`Good quality EL header + Front pipe & Overpipe + Catback `Intake `Ecutek custom tune. Actual power gains will depend on octane used, altitude, car variables etc., but this will get you really close to your goals while staying N/A. We got 17whp on a basically stock car, factory exhausts all the way to the muffler, no intake on 93 octane. Feel free to PM us fi you want some more help or info ![]() -Tristan |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,672
Thanks: 1,439
Thanked 4,012 Times in 2,098 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Removing 1 lb. of wheel mass will improve acceleration more than removing 1 lb. of non-rotational mass, but the effective ratio is more like 1.4, not 10. For tires, it's about 1.9x. It will be a different factor for the driveshaft and a different factor again for the flywheel, and those factors will depend on what gear you're in as well (bigger effect in lower gears). *IF* removing 55 lb. of rotational mass is really the same as removing 550 lb., you would be good for about 102mph in the 1/4 with the stock 200hp. But that ain't happenin... |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post: | CK_Bladesmith (10-21-2013), Team STILLEN (10-19-2013) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adding Coolant | JLMtm | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 5 | 05-11-2013 07:03 AM |
| Sensible Mods Adding Value to FR-S/BRZ? | Braces | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 24 | 11-12-2012 10:32 PM |
| Adding a sub enclosure yet ? | rikdrt1 | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 10 | 06-08-2012 09:28 PM |
| Adding navi to FRS | Pake1 | Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) | 9 | 06-04-2012 10:14 AM |
| Adding Navi to the FRS? | Pake1 | Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment | 3 | 06-01-2012 01:26 PM |