Innovate (Sprintex) Supercharger Owners Topic

[lbroskee]

Originally Posted by jet86

I kinda have the kit.

this shud b interesting

and wheres ur battery??

[Adeets]

Originally Posted by wrxgoose

update for @DarrenDriven




edit: YES. I KNOW THE RPM ARE OFF BY 1K. IGNORE THAT. lol

I would love to but your torque and HP numbers are still crossing at 5225 which means whatever is wrong with your rpm could also be effecting other things, to put it bluntly theres no proof this isn't fabricated or "fixed" how ever you want to take that... Get another dyno.

[wrxgoose]

Originally Posted by Adeets

I would love to but your torque and HP numbers are still crossing at 5225 which means whatever is wrong with your rpm could also be effecting other things, to put it bluntly theres no proof this isn't fabricated or "fixed" how ever you want to take that... Get another dyno.

i could go back to the dyno that showed me having 174 whp stock. I've been using this dyno since i started modding, and I'm sticking with it. I'll see if they can fix it, but i'm standing by my numbers until they tell me otherwise

[Adeets]

Originally Posted by wrxgoose

i could go back to the dyno that showed me having 174 whp stock. I've been using this dyno since i started modding, and I'm sticking with it. I'll see if they can fix it, but i'm standing by my numbers until they tell me otherwise

K, no reason to change if you've been doing the same place the entire time, last couple Q's:
Who's your tuner
I'm taking it that that is e85?
Which pully/psi are you running?
Do you plan on going intercooler when it ships?

[wrxgoose]

Originally Posted by Adeets

K, no reason to change if you've been doing the same place the entire time, last couple Q's:
Who's your tuner
I'm taking it that that is e85?
Which pully/psi are you running?
Do you plan on going intercooler when it ships?

I'm using JR. (the guy who tuned the 12.4 second P&L car) @JuniorAWD

93 octane.

stock pulley (8.5 psi iirc)

and i do plan on getting the I/C when they release it, BUT! my friend has been in touch with some people, which means I could be getting an I/C sooner. More on that later, when I find out more


edit: and looking at the dyno sheet, that does kinda bother me about the RPM. Gotta see if they can fix that, or what's wrong with the dyno

[Adeets]

Originally Posted by wrxgoose

I'm using JR. (the guy who tuned the 12.4 second P&L car) @JuniorAWD

93 octane.

stock pulley (8.5 psi iirc)

and i do plan on getting the I/C when they release it, BUT! my friend has been in touch with some people, which means I could be getting an I/C sooner. More on that later, when I find out more


edit: and looking at the dyno sheet, that does kinda bother me about the RPM. Gotta see if they can fix that, or what's wrong with the dyno

So I read your build, and thruout your entire build on 93 your motor has been pumping some really high numbers, like with catback and intake you were pulling 200hp on 93, where most other users have to go e85 to get those numbers, very healthy motor, but your stock pulls were in line with expected. Your numbers are right along vortech pulls, I thought the stock innovate was ~7psi, not 8.5.

To sum this up, 92 has gotten me to 274 with my vortech, maybe I should stop being lazy and get tuned for 93. Also if your running 8.5psi unintercooled, I think I should try the 12.5 pully with 93.

[Adeets]

Originally Posted by wrxgoose

i could go back to the dyno that showed me having 174 whp stock. I've been using this dyno since i started modding, and I'm sticking with it. I'll see if they can fix it, but i'm standing by my numbers until they tell me otherwise

With your new tune, how are you feeling safety wise, wouldn't happen to have IATs/oil temps would you?

[wrxgoose]

Originally Posted by Adeets

With your new tune, how are you feeling safety wise, wouldn't happen to have IATs/oil temps would you?

unfortunately no.....actually, I may be able to go back to look at the log in a bit. bout to go have dinner with the girl. remind me later, and i'll see what i can find.

[phloozy]

Originally Posted by Adeets

So I read your build, and thruout your entire build on 93 your motor has been pumping some really high numbers, like with catback and intake you were pulling 200hp on 93, where most other users have to go e85 to get those numbers, very healthy motor, but your stock pulls were in line with expected. Your numbers are right along vortech pulls, I thought the stock innovate was ~7psi, not 8.5.

To sum this up, 92 has gotten me to 274 with my vortech, maybe I should stop being lazy and get tuned for 93. Also if your running 8.5psi unintercooled, I think I should try the 12.5 pully with 93.

I didn't want to say anything but I wouldnt compare dyno numbers. Every dyno is different and I have a feeling his reads very high, nothing wrong with that just dont use it to compare to your numbers. From what I am seeing even people with smaller pullies are barely reaching these numbers.

His build is nice though and I'm sure it feels amazing

[Xero-Limit]

Originally Posted by xjohnx

I seem to recall one tuner saying that it can read higher, however needs the MAP tables scaled higher. Maybe FA20Club.com moto-mike or DeliciousTuning can comment.

Even if we scale the stock values to read a little higher, it not only won't be accurate, but it will still not reach the full boost on the stock pulley. So no real benefit there.

The 3 bar MAP allows you to see real boost, we can then adjust timing for actual boost, and you won't need to re-flash for the smaller pulleys. For $108 it is not a hard choice...

In regards to the IC...I think it will be a necessity for folks in hot areas, but it won't be an easy fix for some.

1. It will be h20 to air, so it will heat soak for track days anyway
2. It may be a restriction. The laminova core is nice, but closer to blower redline I think we might see a drop-off. On E85 you're intercooling at the injector. The twin screw design will net temps about 20c lower than a PD blower anyway, so with DI especially, the IC may be redundant and extra complexity/restriction...at least for folks running e85.

[wrxgoose]

Originally Posted by phloozy

I didn't want to say anything but I wouldnt compare dyno numbers. Every dyno is different and I have a feeling his reads very high, nothing wrong with that just dont use it to compare to your numbers. From what I am seeing even people with smaller pullies are barely reaching these numbers.

His build is nice though and I'm sure it feels amazing

Thats why i think i may have a freak block, or could be becUse the tune. I dont know, i juat know what it shows. /Shrug

[phloozy]

Originally Posted by wrxgoose

Thats why i think i may have a freak block, or could be becUse the tune. I dont know, i juat know what it shows. /Shrug

pretty sweet

[DriftEm]

Originally Posted by wrxgoose

Thats why i think i may have a freak block, or could be becUse the tune. I dont know, i juat know what it shows. /Shrug

what does a stock FR-S puts down on this dyno?

[wrxgoose]

i put 151