follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-30-2018, 07:09 PM   #15
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scala View Post
+1 but most people prefer to fool themselves.
And yet it didn't effect mine.

You do know resonators are designed to muffle sound frequencies, that's why there are so many, at the snorkle, airbox an induction pipe.

Lots of R&D went into these little tanks IRT having the vehicles noise level compliant.

But, as always, opinions may vary.
86MLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2018, 11:15 AM   #16
Scala
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2018 BRZ tS
Location: Florida
Posts: 51
Thanks: 29
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So you removed all the "little tanks" and this "didn't effect" your car?
No documented power loss or gain or sound change?

Did you do other modifications at the same time or just that?
Scala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2018, 02:45 PM   #17
re-animator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: San Diego
Posts: 213
Thanks: 135
Thanked 83 Times in 45 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scala View Post
So you removed all the "little tanks" and this "didn't effect" your car?
No documented power loss or gain or sound change?

Did you do other modifications at the same time or just that?
mishimoto posted some numbers that came when they messed with the resonator while designing their intake let me see if i can find it...


turns out removing the resonator actually hurts power:

https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=61621
re-animator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2018, 03:07 PM   #18
Lincoln Logs
Senior Member
 
Lincoln Logs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: #337 2017 Toyota 86
Location: San Diego
Posts: 225
Thanks: 32
Thanked 242 Times in 114 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86MLR View Post
And yet it didn't effect mine.

You do know resonators are designed to muffle sound frequencies, that's why there are so many, at the snorkle, airbox an induction pipe.

Lots of R&D went into these little tanks IRT having the vehicles noise level compliant.

But, as always, opinions may vary.
Did you A/B/A test your results on a dyno? Do you have data backing this claim? Intake design is far more complicated than it ever was. Yes, part of the job for those chambers is to reduce noise but their primary job is to improve the volumetric efficiency of the intake and improve power. Check out the article HERE for more information on this subject.

The factory intake system on most cars are so well designed at this point, it isn't rocket science why aftermarket intakes don't work. Look at most intake systems for this car, they "improve" power slightly on a dyno but in the real world transient throttle response turns to garbage. Hard for a straight piece of pipe to emulate a computer designed and engineered system of resonance chambers to ensure smooth airflow across the MAF.
Lincoln Logs is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Lincoln Logs For This Useful Post:
chaoskaze (08-31-2018), MuseChaser (09-14-2018), re-animator (08-31-2018), Tristor (09-14-2018)
Old 08-31-2018, 03:09 PM   #19
Scala
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2018 BRZ tS
Location: Florida
Posts: 51
Thanks: 29
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thank you re-animator.

Exactly my experiences and those of other Miata NA/NB racers and countless dyno tests. You remove the Helmhotz chamber and you pay for it.
Scala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2018, 07:01 PM   #20
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln Logs View Post
Did you A/B/A test your results on a dyno? Do you have data backing this claim? Intake design is far more complicated than it ever was. Yes, part of the job for those chambers is to reduce noise but their primary job is to improve the volumetric efficiency of the intake and improve power. Check out the article HERE for more information on this subject.

The factory intake system on most cars are so well designed at this point, it isn't rocket science why aftermarket intakes don't work. Look at most intake systems for this car, they "improve" power slightly on a dyno but in the real world transient throttle response turns to garbage. Hard for a straight piece of pipe to emulate a computer designed and engineered system of resonance chambers to ensure smooth airflow across the MAF.
Didn't dyno.

Generally when I do something I see how my 0 - 100 goes.

Both the dyno and the 0-100 have inherent flaws though.

As for the resonator on the intake tube, opinions and results vary, you say it looses power others say it doesn't, why wouldn't the TRD airbox have one?

I'm not buying it, especially when dyno results are brought up, I've seen so much variation over the years, trying to pick one or 2 horsepower isn't going to be repeatable, you can fudge the graph quite easily though to give you any result you want.

IMO dynos are for tuning and circlejerks, 0-100 and the 1/4 mile will tell the truth.

I'm just posting my findings.

Enjoy
86MLR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 11:49 AM   #21
Lincoln Logs
Senior Member
 
Lincoln Logs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: #337 2017 Toyota 86
Location: San Diego
Posts: 225
Thanks: 32
Thanked 242 Times in 114 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86MLR View Post
Didn't dyno.

Generally when I do something I see how my 0 - 100 goes.

Both the dyno and the 0-100 have inherent flaws though.

As for the resonator on the intake tube, opinions and results vary, you say it looses power others say it doesn't, why wouldn't the TRD airbox have one?

I'm not buying it, especially when dyno results are brought up, I've seen so much variation over the years, trying to pick one or 2 horsepower isn't going to be repeatable, you can fudge the graph quite easily though to give you any result you want.

IMO dynos are for tuning and circlejerks, 0-100 and the 1/4 mile will tell the truth.

I'm just posting my findings.

Enjoy
Dynos are not perfect tools and they are often used incorrectly for testing. Real dyno testing needs to happen with the car strapped to the dyno and you make changes to the car right there and test again. The way you strap a car down on the dyno can effect numbers so even coming back the next day to the same dyno can skew results.

Resonance chambers are not always required if the design is correct. I suspect the design of the TRD box accounts for that, those folks know a thing or two. Keep in mind that the TRD airbox fits to the factory snorkle which has resonance chambers on it as well, so it doesn't lose all of them.
Lincoln Logs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 07:49 PM   #22
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
From here > http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...=129897&page=3
Attached Images
 
86MLR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 86MLR For This Useful Post:
Tristor (09-14-2018)
Old 09-14-2018, 11:27 AM   #23
vandemo1133
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Drives: 2015 FRS
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
installed incorrectly?

I have the perrin intake with a perrin inlet tube and doesn't make that suction noise that people talk about for some reason. Is it possible it was installed wrong? Does clamping or loosening the clamps a bit contribute to a better sound at all?
vandemo1133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2018, 11:53 AM   #24
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,282
Thanks: 515
Thanked 1,123 Times in 813 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
the Perrin CAI?
tomm.brz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2018, 12:01 PM   #25
vandemo1133
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Drives: 2015 FRS
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post
the Perrin CAI?
Yes sir!
vandemo1133 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2018, 09:24 AM   #26
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 235
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Is there a noticeable under the hood induction nsound change going from stock to sound tube delete?
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2018, 09:27 AM   #27
Yoshoobaroo
TRACKBREAD
 
Yoshoobaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,032 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Eyo View Post
Is there a noticeable under the hood induction nsound change going from stock to sound tube delete?


In my opinion no. But that varies greatly depending on who you ask. Unplug it at the firewall and go for a drive, it's really easy.
Yoshoobaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2018, 11:50 AM   #28
churchx
Senior Member
 
churchx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,335
Thanks: 698
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Simplest is to not unplug anything. Just plug hole from inside cabin with reusing second ciglighter socket plug from glovebox. No need to buy anything or even lifting hood to just test of how it's w/o soundtube. It's very subjective feel, but with 100% stock exhaust by i had wrong & subjective feel car becoming weaker/limp a bit, so stayed with that soundtube left functional. Probably wouldn't need to, if i had aftermarket exhaust.
churchx is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Easy mods for power and sound. LWAA BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 40 09-13-2015 10:20 PM
easy OEM Sound System Upgrade with DSP OnkelC Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 0 05-24-2015 10:12 AM
Easy in-cabin Subwoofer Upgrade JayNutter Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 17 12-17-2012 05:51 PM
Easy In-Cabin Subwoofer Upgrade (FR-S or BRZ) JayNutter Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 1 12-05-2012 12:41 PM
Inexpensive suggestion for better sound?? ngabdala Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 28 08-24-2012 01:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.