|
||||||
| Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: RX8 S1
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
C-X75
http://www.caradvice.com.au/85274/jaguar-c-x75/
Dont know if it has been mentioned, if it has, remove the thread, but DAMN ![]() ![]() "Top speed is 330km/h (205mph) and 0-100km/h sprints will take just 3.4 seconds. In-gear acceleration is just as ferocious; meaning 80-145km/h comes up in rocket like 2.3 seconds. This is a very quick piece of gear. At the heart of the beast are four 145kW (195bhp) electric motors – one per wheel, which collectively produce a mind-blowing 581 kW (780 bhp) and 1600 Nm of torque. That’s not all. There are also two micro gas turbines, which spin at a staggering 80,000-rpm and can extend the car’s range to an extraordinary 901 kilometres (560 miles) and produce a ridiculously low 28 g/km of C02 from the plug in charging."
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
hashiryu
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Must sound extraordinary. Looks sexy, though there is just something about that design that resonates in the back of my mind as semi-generic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: 2012 BRZ, now track car and GRC dai
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,034
Thanks: 331
Thanked 194 Times in 123 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
arent Jaguar concepts just the best? shame none f them ever make it to production no matter how production viable the are
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Elite Padawan
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: '15 WRX, 15 GLA250, and 2 feet
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 3,498
Thanks: 197
Thanked 250 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
This one looks like a cartoonized supercar. The design is good tho, but the line flow really weak. Look at the Lambo concept or Lotus concept, you will understand what I'm trying to say. This car doesn't belong in 2011, maybe 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Inquisitor
|
I say speed racer, looks like a mach 5
![]() http://images.comicbookresources.com...ach-5.-5x7.jpg and before you know it, there's gonna be a new speed racer series with an all electric gas turbine car piloted by a boy and his brother/monkey sidekick hiding in the trunk |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Supra Owner
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: 1995 Toyota Supra UK Spec
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
WOW!.... Although I can't say I like the front and hood, the side is the sexiest out of all the concept cars I have seen in a LONG time. Reminds me a lot of the XJ220 shape.
I'm liking the Jet engine idea too, it seems like they're really efficient - ~790km out of one tank! How much does it weigh? Too bad it will probably never make it to production.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2002 honda civic ex
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 337
Thanks: 30
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Im pretty sure some company had a turbine engine car out at one point in the 60's, Chrysler maybe?
Edit: yep Chrysler...http://www.motortrend.com/classic/fe...car/index.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: RX8 S1
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
There are massive differences in efficiency for turbines that at generating electricity (the jag) and ones that are directlydriving the car (Chrysler)
A gas turbine running at designe rpm generating electricity is around 98%~ efficient where as outside the desgned range it's fairly inneficient.. And to drive the car directly it would need to change rpm, unless through a cvt
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MODERATOR-SAMA
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Swagtron Scooter
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 345
Thanked 1,562 Times in 524 Posts
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The design language is good, i like it. Its not "normal".
Typically supercars today have a very aggressive presence most predominant seen in the bodylines. Jags C-X75 has a very subtle and elegance to it, moving away from the beauty of the beast with sharp razor like claws. Being more of a shark doing reconnaissance under a catfish skin, swimming with other catfish.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Drives: RX8 S1
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,396
Thanks: 49
Thanked 50 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
thats why turbines are used in electricity generation (both from nuclear power and potential energy) the efficiency of these ones is more like 95% i was exagarating axial flow steam turbines are 98% (same design essentialy but) 40-50% efficiency is what you see from new age diesels
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|