follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack

Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-15-2014, 07:41 PM   #1
Ubersuber
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: BRZ Pearl White
Location: Cochrane, Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Thanks: 54
Thanked 71 Times in 50 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Stock tires give good fuel economy

Switching to Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 in 225/45x17 size changes the indicated average fuel consumption on my BRZ by about 10% (more fuel used) of which only about 1.3% is due to slower wheel rotation (fewer miles recorded than actually travelled).

Food for thought if you are fitting non stock tires, that's quite a cost penalty so those new tires better be good.

The stock tires are pretty light too.

Just don't grip too well compared to the ability of the chassis.
Ubersuber is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ubersuber For This Useful Post:
illicitstylz (07-15-2014), Karigan (07-16-2014)
Old 07-15-2014, 07:51 PM   #2
tahdizzle
So elite I'm 1338
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: WRB Subaru BRZ
Location: California
Posts: 3,008
Thanks: 1,835
Thanked 1,934 Times in 982 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Thanks?
tahdizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 08:37 PM   #3
Ubersuber
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: BRZ Pearl White
Location: Cochrane, Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Thanks: 54
Thanked 71 Times in 50 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yeah, I know. Sorry. As if we needed another reason to keep those stock tires eh?
Ubersuber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 08:38 PM   #4
tahdizzle
So elite I'm 1338
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: WRB Subaru BRZ
Location: California
Posts: 3,008
Thanks: 1,835
Thanked 1,934 Times in 982 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
They're fun to slide around in
tahdizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 09:33 PM   #5
jvincent
Senior Member
 
jvincent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2022 WRB BRZ Sport-Tech
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 131
Thanked 1,411 Times in 715 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Not surprising since the stock Primacies are low rolling resistance, i.e. good mileage.

I just received my new wheels / tires (18x8.5 wheels 225/40 tires) and as it turns out they are exactly the same weight as the OEM setup.

They are going on after my next track day, at which point I am pretty sure my Primacies will be cooked. I'll be curious to see how my mileage changes.
jvincent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 10:04 PM   #6
N1rve
Senior Member
 
N1rve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2019 BMW ///M4
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,332
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,167 Times in 714 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You're increasing width... which means increased rolling resistance.
__________________
N1rve

2019 BMW ///M4 - Alpine White | Sakhir Orange/Black Leather | M-DCT | Executive Package | 19" Black 437M Wheels | Carbon Fiber Trim | Sunroof | Active Blind Spot | Heated Steering Wheel | Adaptive M Suspension
N1rve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 10:54 PM   #7
jvincent
Senior Member
 
jvincent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2022 WRB BRZ Sport-Tech
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 131
Thanked 1,411 Times in 715 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Yep, just curious how much.
jvincent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 10:54 PM   #8
Ubersuber
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: BRZ Pearl White
Location: Cochrane, Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Thanks: 54
Thanked 71 Times in 50 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yes, and I'm driving faster, much faster. Nobody said I was on an economy run and I'm definitely not claiming to be scientific about this. Still, those Primacies are actually pretty good tires...on the right vehicle.
Ubersuber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2014, 06:35 AM   #9
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Increasing width does not increase rolling resistance. In fact, a wider/shorter contact patch should generally have less rolling resistance than a narrower/longer contact patch if all else is equal, as the middle of the narrow/long contact patch is undergoing a lot more deformation and hence loses more energy to hysteresis.

FWIW, my best tankful in my 530ish hp FD, on 255/265 Dunlop StarSpecs, was 29mpg. 465 miles on 15.8 gallons

There are compromises to performance when optimizing for rolling resistance, and there are compromises to rolling resistance when optimizing for performance, BUT there are also some factors that are good for both. Essentially, both high performance and low rolling resistance tires benefit from generating as little heat as possible. For LRR, obviously energy lost to heat is bad, but also for high performance generating heat is bad because the tire will overheat sooner. Less heat generated means a softer more grippy compound can be used.

TL/DR: Wide high-performance tires don't necessarily have high rolling resistance.
ZDan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
fstlane (02-14-2015), Karigan (07-16-2014), wparsons (07-18-2014)
Old 07-16-2014, 06:47 AM   #10
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,097 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)


First 10,400 miles were on stock wheels, without track events.

Subsequent 13,500 miles were on mostly 245/255 Toyo T1Sport, with some on 235 Falken Azenis RT615R (track use).

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2014, 09:25 AM   #11
Philly758
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: GMC
Location: NY
Posts: 258
Thanks: 76
Thanked 45 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rolling resistance aside, wider tires also have more surface area which creates more wind resistance and a decrease in fuel economy.

Curious, did you mount the 225/45's on the stock 7" wide wheels? Any pictures of the fitment? I just picked up some 225/45's and planned on getting 8" wide wheels, but may just slap them on my 7" wheels for now and spend the money on suspension (if the fitment isn't awful).
Philly758 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2014, 10:01 AM   #12
malave7567
Senior Member
 
malave7567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: (formerly) 2013 Raven FR-S
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 396
Thanks: 117
Thanked 218 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly758 View Post
Rolling resistance aside, wider tires also have more surface area which creates more wind resistance and a decrease in fuel economy.

Curious, did you mount the 225/45's on the stock 7" wide wheels? Any pictures of the fitment? I just picked up some 225/45's and planned on getting 8" wide wheels, but may just slap them on my 7" wheels for now and spend the money on suspension (if the fitment isn't awful).
here's the fitment of 225/45-17 Michelin Pilot Super Sports on the stock wheels. I don't have a view straight along the side, this is the best I got.

malave7567 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2014, 10:40 AM   #13
Erci
Senior Member
 
Erci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: 2018 BRZ Limited
Location: Pittsford, VT
Posts: 137
Thanks: 152
Thanked 64 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Physics aside (contact patch size, width, weight, etc), I've gone from LRR tires to normal tires on several vehicles (same size, as well as wider).. fuel eco suffered by 7-10% in all cases.
Erci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2014, 10:49 AM   #14
reeves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: BRZ
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 1,021
Thanks: 289
Thanked 397 Times in 265 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Any fuel economy I lost switching to AS/3's were negligible and more than compensated by the confidence I feel going around curves, braking, and accelerating.. all of which are amplified when it's raining.
reeves is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to reeves For This Useful Post:
Erci (07-16-2014), Karigan (07-16-2014)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why isn't the fuel economy better? White Shadow Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 495 10-28-2019 09:21 AM
Fuel economy deteriorating?? newbrz Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 33 03-14-2014 03:26 PM
What fuel economy numbers are you getting? Chimpo Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 53 01-05-2014 04:55 PM
Fuel economy ozne99 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 48 12-11-2012 01:55 PM
Fuel Economy Lexicon101 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 38 02-22-2010 04:50 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.