follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack

Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-29-2012, 04:24 PM   #1
315FR-S
Senior Member
 
315FR-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: saab 9-3
Location: New York
Posts: 165
Thanks: 52
Thanked 59 Times in 30 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
effects of bigger wheels-video

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_IWa_qlt3g&feature=g-all-u"]5 Minutes to a Faster FR-S - YouTube[/ame]
315FR-S is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to 315FR-S For This Useful Post:
Black Tire (01-26-2013), Fly Guy (06-30-2012), Lonewolf (06-29-2012), MattR (06-30-2012), MF_DEUCE (06-30-2012), PERRIN_Jeff (06-30-2012), RaceR (06-29-2012), Smudgeous (07-01-2012), ultra (06-29-2012)
Old 06-29-2012, 04:47 PM   #2
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Would have been nice if they had run 235/40/17s to compare the same width tires on the two different wheel sizes. They increased the gearing a fair amount with 235/40/18s also.

Good info but not the best testing IMO. I prefer 17s over the 18s regardless but hard to use the test as proof that 18s are worse because of the gearing issue and the width/weight changing.. could have been the 235 width more than the 18s, or could have been the 18s, but better testing would have revealed that.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 05:50 PM   #3
ultra
Curious cat.
 
ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 86 GT base M/T - Red
Location: Dubai
Posts: 775
Thanks: 840
Thanked 383 Times in 191 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Regardless of the absolute rigor of their scientific method, you have to admit it's food for thought.

Those Advans are forged, are they not? Given that and the fact that they're not crazy wide, they should be one of the lighter 18 inch rims out there.

As for the gearing issue, I think tire rack has stats on tire diameter.


Edit: going full nerd;

Stock 17inch rim weight: 21.4lbs

Source:
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7881

OEM tire:Michelin Primacy HP, 215/45/17
OEM tire weight: 20lbs
OEM tire diameter: apparently unknown :P

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....lar=&tab=Specs


Dunlop Direzza Star Spec 215/45/17
Weight: 23lbs
Diameter: 24.6 inches

Dunlop Direzza Star Spec 235/40/18
Weight: 26lbs
Diameter: 25.4 inches

Agree that it would have been interesting for them to have tested a 235/40/17 Star Spec (especially on a lighter 17 inch rim):

Dunlop Star Spec 235/40/17
Weight: 24 lbs
Diameter: 24.4 inches

Source:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....lar=&tab=Specs




__________________
2013 Toyota 86 GT M/T
2009 Renault Clio Sport R27 Team F1 Edition (sold)
1991 Mazda MX5 Miata (sold)
2007 Mitsubishi Evo 9 RS (sold)
2006 VW Golf R32 (sold)

Last edited by ultra; 06-29-2012 at 06:41 PM.
ultra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 06:20 PM   #4
Superhatch
AIM4APX
 
Superhatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ Limited
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,206
Thanks: 642
Thanked 749 Times in 324 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mazdaspeed 3 stock tires:

Dunlop SP Sport 2050
P225/40R18 Y-speed rated high-performance summer tires
240 AA

WRX stock tires:

Dunlop SP Sport 01 235/45R17 Summer High Performance Tires
280 AA

Star Specs:

215/45/17
200AA

While I'm impressed that a set of tires could put the BRZ in front of these two cars on the track, I'd be willing to bet that if you fit the Star Specs to the MS3 and WRX they would still be quicker than the BRZ.

In the end...we need more hp.
__________________
"It's very difficult to present technology as an overtly positive sales device to people who want an emotional car" -Chris Harris
Superhatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 06:28 PM   #5
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra View Post
Regardless of the absolute rigor of their scientific method, you have to admit it's food for thought.

Those Advans are forged, are they not?

As for the gearing issue, I think tire rack has stats on tire diameter.
Not sure on the Advans.

Those tires are .8" larger than stock, which is a decent amount.

What they are attempting to say is that 18s are bad, but they changed more than just diameter which actually makes the statement invalid. A proper test would have been like GRM has done (same tire and wheel, just diameter of wheel changes).

And GRM has found that larger wheels CAN be faster to a point, but that's too general to say 18s are faster since there are many factors.

For this specific car a valid test, IMO, would have been:
Stock
Stock wheels with 215/45/17 good tires (like the star specs they used)
17x8 (or 17x9 pref) Brand X Model Y wheels with same good tires as above but in 235/40 or 245/40 tires.
18x8 (or 18x0..) Brand X Model Y wheels with the same tires as the above in 235/35 or 245/35 depending..
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post:
Ammunition (06-23-2015), ultra (06-30-2012)
Old 06-29-2012, 06:37 PM   #6
FT-86GOD
Senior Rocket Bunny
 
FT-86GOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 1982 XX KE70
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 218 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
could have been the 235 width more than the 18s, or could have been the 18s, but better testing would have revealed that.
Exactly what I was thinking.. Good to watch nonetheless
FT-86GOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2012, 10:23 PM   #7
schtebie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: CBS BRZ Limited
Location: TN
Posts: 494
Thanks: 336
Thanked 193 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra View Post
Those Advans are forged, are they not? Given that and the fact that they're not crazy wide, they should be one of the lighter 18 inch rims out there.
The Advan RGIIs are 1-piece cast. They're lighter than stock wheels, but certainly not as light as a forged wheel can be.

Just for reference, here's a 18x10 (closest I could find).

schtebie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to schtebie For This Useful Post:
ultra (06-30-2012)
Old 06-30-2012, 02:49 AM   #8
MF_DEUCE
Adventure Enthusiast
 
MF_DEUCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,024
Thanks: 125
Thanked 103 Times in 58 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
wish this video was a bit longer and detailed, but a good reference point for rubber and wheel shopping.
__________________
"I say why do you care what other people think about you when driving your car, why can't you just enjoy it for what it is and have fun with that?"
- Carlos Lago, Motor Trend
MF_DEUCE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 11:37 AM   #9
DrDuquette
Senior Member
 
DrDuquette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Premium White, 2006 TL
Location: California
Posts: 351
Thanks: 272
Thanked 84 Times in 51 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Physics, it's all physics

I was thinking this through last night and came to the conclusion that bigger may not mean better (but Yes they look oh so good). Take this into consideration. We will concentrate on acceleration and deceleration in this example only. Road holding will be another issue for later.

Lets compare the stock wheel tire set up with a wheel tire set up that is just 1" bigger. So lets compare the stock 17" to a set of 18". But consider that everything is the SAME. Same tire, Same wheel etc. But the only thing is that it is a 18" wheel. Lets also say that the weight of the tire is the same as the 17" and the wheel weight is also the same. I know this would be hard to compare in the real world, but lets use Physics.

So lets just look at the wheel. If we bump out the wheel from 17" to 18" this will cause the outer mass of the wheel to be a 1/2 further out from the axle.

And if you look at the tire mass. Now the decrease in series tire, to keep the overall wheel tire diameter the same, would mean the tire is thinner, but also that the overall bulk of the tire weight will also be further from the axle.

Now if you put this together it means that YES the overall weight of the tire wheel combo is the SAME, BUT the MASS of the wheel tire combo has MOVED further away from the axle. This means that it would take the car more energy to cause the wheel to turn, thus, a slower acceleration and stopping.

So in reality it is not the fact that getting BIGGER wheels is what slows down the car in acceleration and deceleration, IT IS the FACT that you are MOVING the mass into an area that is less advantageous.

Take this example, put a wheel that is 13" with a tire that makes the same overall wheel size as the stock 17". This would give you a huge increase in acceleration due to not only the wheel being lighter due to size, but all the major mass is very close to the axle.

SOOO, if you want to increase you wheel to an 18" you will have to make a change somewhere to keep your speed. Either a major reduction in wheel tire weight, or boost the horsepower.

There is your physics lesson for today. Anything else I can help with?:happy0180:

Last edited by DrDuquette; 06-30-2012 at 11:38 AM. Reason: spelling
DrDuquette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DrDuquette For This Useful Post:
BAOVAN (12-28-2016), drei (06-30-2012), Scooby South (07-01-2012)
Old 06-30-2012, 11:56 AM   #10
miodculae
FRS Adept
 
miodculae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Firestorm FRS
Location: NYC
Posts: 171
Thanks: 45
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What you're saying is simple increasing the width pushes the mass further from the axle . . .
thereby decreasing acc-/de-celeration.

But what if you keep the width the same, weight the same, but simply increase the height
only. go up to 18 (or 19) and keep the width at 7.5

that may keep the gains the same.

in addition, in the video those 18s still produced a noticeable gain over the stock set-up.
miodculae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 12:07 PM   #11
DrDuquette
Senior Member
 
DrDuquette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Premium White, 2006 TL
Location: California
Posts: 351
Thanks: 272
Thanked 84 Times in 51 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Still moving mass

Quote:
Originally Posted by miodculae View Post
What you're saying is simple increasing the width pushes the mass further from the axle . . .
thereby decreasing acc-/de-celeration.

But what if you keep the width the same, weight the same, but simply increase the height
only. go up to 18 (or 19) and keep the width at 7.5

that may keep the gains the same.

in addition, in the video those 18s still produced a noticeable gain over the stock set-up.
You are STILL pushing the mass further from the axle. That's still happening. Now the question is how much different does the car drive? I'm just pointing out the physics and what changes happen with tire size increase. My example before assumed the width was the same. :happy0180:
DrDuquette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 01:11 PM   #12
Exhaust
UCanThrottleMyBody
 
Exhaust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2015 GM 370z Sport
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 657
Thanked 380 Times in 248 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Sigh, i guess its back to the drawing board once again.
Exhaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 01:50 AM   #13
Jimbo
Senior Member
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 92 NSX, 08 Accord
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 159
Thanks: 1
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Road & Track does a test with tires on a FR-S

http://www.roadandtrack.com/highligh...-a-faster-fr-s

Bigger isn't always better. But then we all knew that.

-J
__________________
1992 NSX Red/Blk 5 spd #0330
2005 Lotus Elise - (sold but reincarnated by BRZ)
2008 Honda Accord Cpe, Blk/Blk,V6,6 spd, Nav (sold)
2013 Subaru BRZ, Limited, 6 spd Auto, WR Blue
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jimbo For This Useful Post:
ft86Fan (07-01-2012)
Old 07-01-2012, 02:35 AM   #14
Nate219BRZ
Senior Member
 
Nate219BRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Rip 04 golf gti rip 05 scion TC
Location: NWI
Posts: 230
Thanks: 68
Thanked 65 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Very true, but damn my 8 in wide wheels look hella good on my car...
Nate219BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nate219BRZ For This Useful Post:
Fly Guy (07-01-2012)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subaru 216A confirmed with 2.0L turbo, AWD, bigger and heavier than FT-86 Hachiroku BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 118 11-16-2017 03:19 PM
Which 18" wheels will weigh the same or less than the stock wheels? mickey177 Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 32 05-16-2013 04:07 PM
Getting Bigger phenoyz Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 4 05-30-2012 10:22 AM
Bigger Muffler Tips? dookie11 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 45 03-12-2012 07:37 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.