|
||||||
| Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: saab 9-3
Location: New York
Posts: 165
Thanks: 52
Thanked 59 Times in 30 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
effects of bigger wheels-video
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_IWa_qlt3g&feature=g-all-u"]5 Minutes to a Faster FR-S - YouTube[/ame]
|
|
|
|
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to 315FR-S For This Useful Post: | Black Tire (01-26-2013), Fly Guy (06-30-2012), Lonewolf (06-29-2012), MattR (06-30-2012), MF_DEUCE (06-30-2012), PERRIN_Jeff (06-30-2012), RaceR (06-29-2012), Smudgeous (07-01-2012), ultra (06-29-2012) |
|
|
#2 |
|
Site Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
Would have been nice if they had run 235/40/17s to compare the same width tires on the two different wheel sizes. They increased the gearing a fair amount with 235/40/18s also.
Good info but not the best testing IMO. I prefer 17s over the 18s regardless but hard to use the test as proof that 18s are worse because of the gearing issue and the width/weight changing.. could have been the 235 width more than the 18s, or could have been the 18s, but better testing would have revealed that.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback DD: 2005 Acura TSX Tow: 2022 F-450 Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Curious cat.
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 86 GT base M/T - Red
Location: Dubai
Posts: 775
Thanks: 840
Thanked 383 Times in 191 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Regardless of the absolute rigor of their scientific method, you have to admit it's food for thought.
![]() Those Advans are forged, are they not? Given that and the fact that they're not crazy wide, they should be one of the lighter 18 inch rims out there. As for the gearing issue, I think tire rack has stats on tire diameter. Edit: going full nerd; Stock 17inch rim weight: 21.4lbs Source: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7881 OEM tire:Michelin Primacy HP, 215/45/17 OEM tire weight: 20lbs OEM tire diameter: apparently unknown :P http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....lar=&tab=Specs Dunlop Direzza Star Spec 215/45/17 Weight: 23lbs Diameter: 24.6 inches Dunlop Direzza Star Spec 235/40/18 Weight: 26lbs Diameter: 25.4 inches Agree that it would have been interesting for them to have tested a 235/40/17 Star Spec (especially on a lighter 17 inch rim): Dunlop Star Spec 235/40/17 Weight: 24 lbs Diameter: 24.4 inches Source: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....lar=&tab=Specs
__________________
2013 Toyota 86 GT M/T
2009 Renault Clio Sport R27 Team F1 Edition (sold) 1991 Mazda MX5 Miata (sold) 2007 Mitsubishi Evo 9 RS (sold) 2006 VW Golf R32 (sold) Last edited by ultra; 06-29-2012 at 06:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
AIM4APX
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ Limited
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,206
Thanks: 642
Thanked 749 Times in 324 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Mazdaspeed 3 stock tires:
Dunlop SP Sport 2050 P225/40R18 Y-speed rated high-performance summer tires 240 AA WRX stock tires: Dunlop SP Sport 01 235/45R17 Summer High Performance Tires 280 AA Star Specs: 215/45/17 200AA While I'm impressed that a set of tires could put the BRZ in front of these two cars on the track, I'd be willing to bet that if you fit the Star Specs to the MS3 and WRX they would still be quicker than the BRZ. In the end...we need more hp.
__________________
"It's very difficult to present technology as an overtly positive sales device to people who want an emotional car" -Chris Harris
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Site Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Those tires are .8" larger than stock, which is a decent amount. What they are attempting to say is that 18s are bad, but they changed more than just diameter which actually makes the statement invalid. A proper test would have been like GRM has done (same tire and wheel, just diameter of wheel changes). And GRM has found that larger wheels CAN be faster to a point, but that's too general to say 18s are faster since there are many factors. For this specific car a valid test, IMO, would have been: Stock Stock wheels with 215/45/17 good tires (like the star specs they used) 17x8 (or 17x9 pref) Brand X Model Y wheels with same good tires as above but in 235/40 or 245/40 tires. 18x8 (or 18x0..) Brand X Model Y wheels with the same tires as the above in 235/35 or 245/35 depending..
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback DD: 2005 Acura TSX Tow: 2022 F-450 Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post: | Ammunition (06-23-2015), ultra (06-30-2012) |
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Rocket Bunny
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 1982 XX KE70
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 218 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: CBS BRZ Limited
Location: TN
Posts: 494
Thanks: 336
Thanked 193 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Just for reference, here's a 18x10 (closest I could find).
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to schtebie For This Useful Post: | ultra (06-30-2012) |
|
|
#8 |
|
Adventure Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,024
Thanks: 125
Thanked 103 Times in 58 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
wish this video was a bit longer and detailed, but a good reference point for rubber and wheel shopping.
__________________
"I say why do you care what other people think about you when driving your car, why can't you just enjoy it for what it is and have fun with that?" - Carlos Lago, Motor Trend |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Premium White, 2006 TL
Location: California
Posts: 351
Thanks: 272
Thanked 84 Times in 51 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Physics, it's all physics
I was thinking this through last night and came to the conclusion that bigger may not mean better (but Yes they look oh so good). Take this into consideration. We will concentrate on acceleration and deceleration in this example only. Road holding will be another issue for later.
Lets compare the stock wheel tire set up with a wheel tire set up that is just 1" bigger. So lets compare the stock 17" to a set of 18". But consider that everything is the SAME. Same tire, Same wheel etc. But the only thing is that it is a 18" wheel. Lets also say that the weight of the tire is the same as the 17" and the wheel weight is also the same. I know this would be hard to compare in the real world, but lets use Physics. So lets just look at the wheel. If we bump out the wheel from 17" to 18" this will cause the outer mass of the wheel to be a 1/2 further out from the axle. And if you look at the tire mass. Now the decrease in series tire, to keep the overall wheel tire diameter the same, would mean the tire is thinner, but also that the overall bulk of the tire weight will also be further from the axle. Now if you put this together it means that YES the overall weight of the tire wheel combo is the SAME, BUT the MASS of the wheel tire combo has MOVED further away from the axle. This means that it would take the car more energy to cause the wheel to turn, thus, a slower acceleration and stopping. So in reality it is not the fact that getting BIGGER wheels is what slows down the car in acceleration and deceleration, IT IS the FACT that you are MOVING the mass into an area that is less advantageous. Take this example, put a wheel that is 13" with a tire that makes the same overall wheel size as the stock 17". This would give you a huge increase in acceleration due to not only the wheel being lighter due to size, but all the major mass is very close to the axle. SOOO, if you want to increase you wheel to an 18" you will have to make a change somewhere to keep your speed. Either a major reduction in wheel tire weight, or boost the horsepower. There is your physics lesson for today. Anything else I can help with?:happy0180: Last edited by DrDuquette; 06-30-2012 at 11:38 AM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DrDuquette For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10 |
|
FRS Adept
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Firestorm FRS
Location: NYC
Posts: 171
Thanks: 45
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
What you're saying is simple increasing the width pushes the mass further from the axle . . .
thereby decreasing acc-/de-celeration. But what if you keep the width the same, weight the same, but simply increase the height only. go up to 18 (or 19) and keep the width at 7.5 that may keep the gains the same. in addition, in the video those 18s still produced a noticeable gain over the stock set-up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Premium White, 2006 TL
Location: California
Posts: 351
Thanks: 272
Thanked 84 Times in 51 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Still moving mass
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 92 NSX, 08 Accord
Location: Southampton, PA
Posts: 159
Thanks: 1
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Road & Track does a test with tires on a FR-S
http://www.roadandtrack.com/highligh...-a-faster-fr-s
Bigger isn't always better. But then we all knew that. -J
__________________
1992 NSX Red/Blk 5 spd #0330
2005 Lotus Elise - (sold but reincarnated by BRZ) 2008 Honda Accord Cpe, Blk/Blk,V6,6 spd, Nav (sold) 2013 Subaru BRZ, Limited, 6 spd Auto, WR Blue |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jimbo For This Useful Post: | ft86Fan (07-01-2012) |
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Rip 04 golf gti rip 05 scion TC
Location: NWI
Posts: 230
Thanks: 68
Thanked 65 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Very true, but damn my 8 in wide wheels look hella good on my car...
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Nate219BRZ For This Useful Post: | Fly Guy (07-01-2012) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Subaru 216A confirmed with 2.0L turbo, AWD, bigger and heavier than FT-86 | Hachiroku | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 118 | 11-16-2017 03:19 PM |
| Which 18" wheels will weigh the same or less than the stock wheels? | mickey177 | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 32 | 05-16-2013 04:07 PM |
| Getting Bigger | phenoyz | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 4 | 05-30-2012 10:22 AM |
| Bigger Muffler Tips? | dookie11 | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 45 | 03-12-2012 07:37 PM |