follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List
steve99

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2016, 05:37 PM   #463
Jyn
Noob
 
Jyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: FR-S Mammogram
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,594
Thanks: 577
Thanked 888 Times in 485 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Sorry to bring up an older thread. I saw some recommendations that TRD intake doesn't need to be scaled, but looking through some logs I have from today, I see about 8-10% on LTFT in some cruising data. The interesting part is that my WOT 3rd gear pull is 0% LTFT.

Is this something that needs to be corrected via MAF scaling, or is that to be expected from TRD intake + full UEL header-back exhaust?
__________________
Jyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2016, 07:08 PM   #464
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jyn View Post
Sorry to bring up an older thread. I saw some recommendations that TRD intake doesn't need to be scaled, but looking through some logs I have from today, I see about 8-10% on LTFT in some cruising data. The interesting part is that my WOT 3rd gear pull is 0% LTFT.

Is this something that needs to be corrected via MAF scaling, or is that to be expected from TRD intake + full UEL header-back exhaust?

The TRD intake wont cause the maf scaling to change but its not unusual for stock maf scaling to be out by 8% or so in places even with stock intake.

So maf scaling is usually beneficial even with stock intake.

Some aftermarket intakes will see ltft of 15 to 20% thats when your rearly must rescale.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
Jyn (01-15-2016)
Old 02-06-2016, 04:25 PM   #465
eddieflyinv
Senior Member
 
eddieflyinv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Ireland
Posts: 225
Thanks: 133
Thanked 57 Times in 43 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
http://datazap.me/u/eddieflyinv/perr...=0&data=3-4-10

this is the 5th log after installing perrin 3inch intake, with their supplied maf scale... worst anyone has ever seen??
i figured id give it some time to learn after watching the first logs numbers creep up, but it just got worse and worse,
mods on car are crawford bpb, tanabe catless fp (possible its leaking ? did some reading and this crazy of ltft can be caused by that ?) and a catback,

any pros out there care to share if they think its a tune issue or hardware problem? hadnt noticed any leaks in the exhaust, and i was pretty thorough with the intake install, everything was tight and secure, so yeah, is the perrin scaling really this bad ???
eddieflyinv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2016, 06:39 PM   #466
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddieflyinv View Post
http://datazap.me/u/eddieflyinv/perr...=0&data=3-4-10

this is the 5th log after installing perrin 3inch intake, with their supplied maf scale... worst anyone has ever seen??
i figured id give it some time to learn after watching the first logs numbers creep up, but it just got worse and worse,
mods on car are crawford bpb, tanabe catless fp (possible its leaking ? did some reading and this crazy of ltft can be caused by that ?) and a catback,

any pros out there care to share if they think its a tune issue or hardware problem? hadnt noticed any leaks in the exhaust, and i was pretty thorough with the intake install, everything was tight and secure, so yeah, is the perrin scaling really this bad ???

1. The perrin supplied scaling is not very good in car I tried it on

2. you rearly do need to make sure you have no intake or exhaust leaks else this will cause high LTFT, exhaust leaks usually give you high positive trims at lower, which you dont have.

you either need to rescale maf yourself see links at bottom or

I suggest you try @Wayno s3" maf scaling, knowing wayno it will be pretty good.

Make sure you use the 3" perrin if you have that , the spreadsheet below has both 2.75 and 3

whole thread here http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94822

direct link to maf scalings
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...-UL7XLR3Y/edit
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
eddieflyinv (02-06-2016)
Old 02-14-2016, 10:48 AM   #467
eddieflyinv
Senior Member
 
eddieflyinv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Ireland
Posts: 225
Thanks: 133
Thanked 57 Times in 43 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
@steve99 thanks for the advice and the links.
I have been using Waynos 3" Perrin MAF scale for a week now and my numbers aren't looking that much better for LTFT
I want to start scaling the MAF myself but it's like -18°C outside right now and I have seen multiple recommendations of doing scaling when its 20-25°C..
What I'm thinking is if I flatten the IAT Compensation tables can I effectively do the scaling now? Or am I wasting my efforts considering how cold it is. I would rather not reinstall the OEM intake. And really hope I don't have to wait till it warms up to do this as I am still seeing up to -20% at times and it bothers me a lot.
Thanks in advance,

Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
eddieflyinv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 10:47 PM   #468
jprice130
AutoX Nut
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2020 Toyota Supra
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 268
Thanks: 76
Thanked 74 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Been trying to dial in my MAF scale and the last two tunes I flashed are producing 0 LTFT in both closed loop and open loop. This has remained for 50+ miles after flashing. I am seeing various STFT values in my logs but LTFT is pegged at zero no matter what. I'm fairly certain my MAF scale is not that perfect (ha, ha), so is there something I'm missing that would cause this?
jprice130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 11:54 PM   #469
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 896 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddieflyinv View Post
@steve99 thanks for the advice and the links.
I have been using Waynos 3" Perrin MAF scale for a week now and my numbers aren't looking that much better for LTFT
I want to start scaling the MAF myself but it's like -18°C outside right now and I have seen multiple recommendations of doing scaling when its 20-25°C..
What I'm thinking is if I flatten the IAT Compensation tables can I effectively do the scaling now? Or am I wasting my efforts considering how cold it is. I would rather not reinstall the OEM intake. And really hope I don't have to wait till it warms up to do this as I am still seeing up to -20% at times and it bothers me a lot.
Thanks in advance,

Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
I've never worked on any 3" perrin.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2016, 12:05 AM   #470
phrosty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Seattle
Posts: 806
Thanks: 202
Thanked 321 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddieflyinv View Post
...can I effectively do the scaling now?
If you scale your MAF now, the values will be valid for your current temps. You'll just have to redo it later on when it warms up. If you're seeing -20%, I'd definitely do it now assuming you've checked for leaks already.
__________________
2013 Whiteout 6AT FR-S | Perrin Inlet Tube + 2.75" CAI | OpenFlash Header | P&L Catback | 4.88 Final Drive | Dialed in OFT 2.0x Stage 2 E85 | 18x8 Enkei Raijin + 225/40 Michelin Pilot Super Sport | 17x7 Stock + 215/45 Michelin X-Ice Xi-2
phrosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2016, 10:23 AM   #471
jvincent
Senior Member
 
jvincent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2022 WRB BRZ Sport-Tech
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 131
Thanked 1,411 Times in 715 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddieflyinv View Post
What I'm thinking is if I flatten the IAT Compensation tables can I effectively do the scaling now? Or am I wasting my efforts considering how cold it is.
Unfortunately the way the IAT temperature compensation table is defined makes it pretty much useless for any kind of fine grained control.

I don't have it in front of me fright now but IIRC the table supports an adjustment range of +/- 50% in 4% increments from the baseline of 68* F.

The problem is that for the temperature ranges we actually see you need a much smaller adjustment range but the table won't let you do it properly.
jvincent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2016, 12:01 PM   #472
eddieflyinv
Senior Member
 
eddieflyinv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Ireland
Posts: 225
Thanks: 133
Thanked 57 Times in 43 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
I've never worked on any 3" perrin.
Huh.. There was a 3" perrin scale in whatever link @steve99 directed me too, that was different from the Perrin supplied MAF. No big deal though, i went ahead and did my own scaling, I was worried about the temps throwing things off but im within about 3% +/- and as the temps have been rising its getting better, so it all worked out anyways

Sent from my LG-H812 using Tapatalk
eddieflyinv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2016, 12:22 PM   #473
jprice130
AutoX Nut
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2020 Toyota Supra
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 268
Thanks: 76
Thanked 74 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jprice130 View Post
Been trying to dial in my MAF scale and the last two tunes I flashed are producing 0 LTFT in both closed loop and open loop. This has remained for 50+ miles after flashing. I am seeing various STFT values in my logs but LTFT is pegged at zero no matter what. I'm fairly certain my MAF scale is not that perfect (ha, ha), so is there something I'm missing that would cause this?
I'm now 100+ miles since my last flash and I'm still getting 0 LTFT. I ran a log with mostly closed loop driving for 20 minutes and LTFT was zero the entire time. Has anyone else ever experienced this? I've been logging with the Tactrix OP2 and I haven't changed my logcfg.txt file in over a year. All other parameters log as expected.
jprice130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2016, 10:23 AM   #474
cawith
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: Toyota GT86 6M/T
Location: Denmark
Posts: 90
Thanks: 59
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hi,

So I decided to try scale my closed loop as well now, but I'm not sure about all the settings when loading logs.

Do the ones shown in the screenshot look alright? I don't know why the MAF Voltage Maximum is 32, it was supposed to be 3.2V.

Also, at idle the engine load is below the minimum of 0.2. Should I lower that minimum, so that it counts the idle cells in as well, or is it better to leave that out?

Thanks!
Attached Images
 
cawith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2016, 05:54 PM   #475
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,996
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,994 Times in 2,984 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cawith View Post
Hi,

So I decided to try scale my closed loop as well now, but I'm not sure about all the settings when loading logs.

Do the ones shown in the screenshot look alright? I don't know why the MAF Voltage Maximum is 32, it was supposed to be 3.2V.

Also, at idle the engine load is below the minimum of 0.2. Should I lower that minimum, so that it counts the idle cells in as well, or is it better to leave that out?

Thanks!

yes change the ol/cl voltage to 3.2 not 32


the min load is probably ok at 0.2 but you could try 0.1
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
cawith (04-22-2016)
Old 04-21-2016, 09:03 PM   #476
freerunner
Senior Member
 
freerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 141
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cawith View Post
Do the ones shown in the screenshot look alright? I don't know why the MAF Voltage Maximum is 32, it was supposed to be 3.2V.
Yeah, it's a bug in vgitool for everyone whose system locale is not English.

If you want to keep your currently used system locale settings, you can use per-app locale setting as a workaround:

Edit your run.bat. After javaw.exe add two variables:
Code:
-Duser.language=en -Duser.country=us
If you're using Romraider, you'll want to run it like that, too. Else you might not be able to copy&paste table values.
freerunner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freerunner For This Useful Post:
cawith (04-22-2016)
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AFR in Closed Loop Toyota John Software Tuning 39 07-07-2019 09:26 AM
BRZedit Fuel Trims, Closed to Open loop transiton mad_sb Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 32 08-06-2015 04:14 AM
Notes on injector / maf scalining using full time open loop mad_sb Software Tuning 40 03-03-2014 06:49 PM
Screencast: closed loop boost control with RaceRom jamesm Software Tuning 2 02-10-2014 03:23 PM
Screencast: experimenting with full-time closed loop fueling jamesm Software Tuning 2 12-27-2013 11:19 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.