follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2014, 02:38 PM   #29
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
It looks like a layer of powder coating was removed. That layer missing would have lowered the clamping force. Was it missing from both holes, on both sides?
It's the other way around. Slipping caused some paint to scrape. I bought these coilovers brand new and there was no paint missing when I first installed them. And if some paint were initially missing, the bolt/nut would just clamp down a few microns closer. 114 ft-lbs is still 114 ft-lbs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Edit, it also looks like the side of the hole is mushroomed, that wouldn't have happened if the bolts was torqued.
As I stated multiple times, all bolts were torqued to their rated spec. Any tighter poses the risks of snapping or cross-threading. The problem was a shrunken bolt should not be used in an enlarged hole.
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2014, 08:28 PM   #30
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I fail to see how a smaller bolt and oval hole has any effect on this since the head of the bolt is still the same size and that is what is applying the clamping force, not the diameter of the bolt itself.

If you could make one strong enough, a 1mm bolt with the same size heads would apply the same clamping force as stock through either a round or oval hole.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 02:53 AM   #31
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
I fail to see how a smaller bolt and oval hole has any effect on this since the head of the bolt is still the same size and that is what is applying the clamping force, not the diameter of the bolt itself.

If you could make one strong enough, a 1mm bolt with the same size heads would apply the same clamping force as stock through either a round or oval hole.
I want to emphasize that I torqued everything to spec the first time, no question. I even had to take a breaker bar to the [already slipped] camber bolts because they were still on tight... right around 114 ft-lbs.

Look back at post #8 and the end of post #4 from this thread. I don't think those warnings were pulled out of their ass nor based on theory but reality. Notice the correlation between what they say and what happened to me. Actual result trumps the hypothetical. Not sure what's left to argue.
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 02:20 PM   #32
post_break
Professional Smartass
 
post_break's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: White Out FRS
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,126
Thanks: 114
Thanked 610 Times in 308 Posts
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Did you use smaller bolts on both the upper and lower? Sorry if you said this already, I just couldn't tell. Sorry I can't help with locating the insert, I've seen them before included with other coils. Essentially turning a smaller bolt into an eccentric bolt.
post_break is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 02:27 PM   #33
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by post_break View Post
Did you use smaller bolts on both the upper and lower? Sorry if you said this already, I just couldn't tell. Sorry I can't help with locating the insert, I've seen them before included with other coils. Essentially turning a smaller bolt into an eccentric bolt.
Lower hole can only use the smaller 14mm bolt in all cases. Upper hole comes stock with a larger 16mm shoulder bolt. A smaller 14mm OEM "camber bolt" can be used in place of the 16mm bolt in the upper hole and happens to have the same part number as the 14mm lower bolt. I used the smaller bolts on the upper holes initially, and they slipped. Swapped the stock 16mm shoulder bolts back into the upper holes, and they're holding up fine.
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2014, 10:28 PM   #34
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
it also looks like the side of the hole is mushroomed
Just an update on the mushroom comment: I bought new nuts and installed them today (service manual recommends replacing with new nuts everytime they are removed) just in case reusing the old ones might have caused slippage. The old nuts were still holding in the max negative position when I removed them but I replaced them anyway and inspected the mushrooming. It isn't truly mushroomed; the thread of the bolt just bites into the metal leaving an indentation at the surface. Past the surface, the actual slot itself isn't mushroomed (though the illusion is there).
Attached Images
 
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2014, 05:01 AM   #35
acx23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS (Silver)
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 143
Thanks: 50
Thanked 81 Times in 49 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
In case you're curious, I used a set of H&R Triple C 14mm camber bolts (leftover from my WRX days) on the bottom strut slot. I was able to get -1.1/-1.2 camber. Technically you can get more camber if you have camber bolts on top and bottom, with the bottom set at max camber, you adjust the top camber bolt for more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
^Are you using those with slotted upper holes? Because I also got -1.2 camber when I used OEM camber bolts on my stock struts. But the same set of camber bolts on my new slotted hole coilovers yield 0 camber (the same 14mm bolts x 4 all around).



I've heard that somewhere as well. But IIRC, that's after a certain point of lowering, closer to when the car is slammed. The wheel fitment sticky thread shows negative camber results when lowering the car 1". I'm between 1" to 1.25" lower than stock and two guys are running the same coilovers as mine (ST) with the same out-of-the-box height settings but stock 16mm bolts instead of camber bolts. They get close to -2 camber in front. (TeamZleep and Shutter in this thread: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...t=41432&page=3).

And this guy in another thread posted this regarding coilovers with a slotted top hole without explaining why:
acx23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 10:29 AM   #36
oc-drummer
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: a Honda
Location: PA
Posts: 88
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks for posting this and saving us potential headaches. Have the stock bolts stayed locked in for good now?
oc-drummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 10:52 AM   #37
FR-S Matt
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I'm in this same scenario. Probably sticking with the 16MM in the top slotted hole on the V3's.


My question is, -2 possible with the slotted top hole on the V3's or am I going to need bottom bolts for a tad bit more?

Last edited by FR-S Matt; 02-05-2014 at 11:09 AM.
FR-S Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 10:56 AM   #38
smbstyle
Senior Member
 
smbstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ
Location: Forsyth, GA
Posts: 1,008
Thanks: 224
Thanked 681 Times in 302 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
There are plenty of us running 14mm OEM crash bolts in slotted upper strut holes, in fact RCE even recommended this for people running OEM top hats to get max negative camber.

I am running 14mm OEM crash bolts in the slotted upper strut hole on my RCE T2s, have about 500 track miles on the setup, and not one bit of slip.
__________________
-----------------------------------
2013 SWP BRZ
Build Thread: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38781
smbstyle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to smbstyle For This Useful Post:
ATL BRZ (06-27-2014)
Old 02-05-2014, 11:34 AM   #39
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by oc-drummer View Post
Thanks for posting this and saving us potential headaches. Have the stock bolts stayed locked in for good now?
Yeah, they're still in the same position with the stock bolts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FR-S Matt View Post
I'm in this same scenario. Probably sticking with the 16MM in the top slotted hole on the V3's.


My question is, -2 possible with the slotted top hole on the V3's or am I going to need bottom bolts for a tad bit more?
I got -2 left/-1.7 right with this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smbstyle View Post
There are plenty of us running 14mm OEM crash bolts in slotted upper strut holes, in fact RCE even recommended this for people running OEM top hats to get max negative camber.

I am running 14mm OEM crash bolts in the slotted upper strut hole on my RCE T2s, have about 500 track miles on the setup, and not one bit of slip.
What value did you torque to? I read someone did 130 ft-lbs which probably works. There are other ways to make the 14mm bolt work such as inserting a custom fabbed slug insert in the slot or using special washers with teeth. My coilover instructions say to torque to the manufacturer's spec (114 ft-lbs) so that's what I did.
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 11:37 AM   #40
FR-S Matt
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by smbstyle View Post
There are plenty of us running 14mm OEM crash bolts in slotted upper strut holes, in fact RCE even recommended this for people running OEM top hats to get max negative camber.

I am running 14mm OEM crash bolts in the slotted upper strut hole on my RCE T2s, have about 500 track miles on the setup, and not one bit of slip.
I'll probably pick some up at the dealership. Hard to pass up when they're cheap. Should be able to fine adjust -2.0 on a 14MM upper crash bolt in the slotted hole.
FR-S Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2014, 11:42 AM   #41
smbstyle
Senior Member
 
smbstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ
Location: Forsyth, GA
Posts: 1,008
Thanks: 224
Thanked 681 Times in 302 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
Yeah, they're still in the same position with the stock bolts.

I got -2 left/-1.7 right with this.

What value did you torque to? I read someone did 130 ft-lbs which probably works. There are other ways to make the 14mm bolt work such as inserting a custom fabbed slug insert in the slot or using special washers with teeth. My coilover instructions say to torque to the manufacturer's spec (114 ft-lbs) so that's what I did.
I torqued to 130 ft/lbs, they can easily be torqued up to 150 ft/lbs, but 130 has worked great for me.
__________________
-----------------------------------
2013 SWP BRZ
Build Thread: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38781
smbstyle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to smbstyle For This Useful Post:
ATL BRZ (06-27-2014)
Old 02-05-2014, 12:24 PM   #42
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,562
Thanks: 8,942
Thanked 14,211 Times in 6,854 Posts
Mentioned: 970 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
We haven't had any issues.

How easily can you scratch the housing on your ST coilovers? The Tein SRCs we have don't just have a slot for camber bolts; it has a full on enlarged hole so that the entire position can be altered and held by camber.

We put a painted "x" over our bolt and on the shock body to make sure it hasn't moved.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camber Bolt Help Please! ft86Fan Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 114 02-27-2019 12:13 PM
Camber bolt on KW V3 derek1ee Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 5 05-25-2017 12:21 PM
slotted upper strut hole hanabie Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 6 11-22-2013 11:31 PM
Camber bolt help oofie Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 8 11-22-2013 02:36 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.