follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2012, 12:48 PM   #29
Draco-REX
Corner Junkie
 
Draco-REX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 11 STI, 99 RS
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 129
Thanked 1,521 Times in 702 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'm not so sure. Hopefully a reviewer will dredge up a stock S2K to put against the BRZ. I think they'll be very close.
Draco-REX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:00 PM   #30
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
What makes you think it'll be close? So far Zdan is 100% correct.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:05 PM   #31
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,048
Thanks: 7,728
Thanked 19,277 Times in 8,387 Posts
Mentioned: 696 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
I don't know what the S2000 c.g. height is, but I doubt it's much (if any) higher.
S2k's CoG is estimated around 18.8~19.8. FRS/BRZ claims 460mm (18.1"?), so about inch or 2 higher for S2k.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:11 PM   #32
blu_
Senior Member
 
blu_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SWP BRZ LTD
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 889
Thanks: 637
Thanked 170 Times in 106 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
No clue which would be faster. You can't really compare them stock for stock. The ap1 has even worse stock tires and is heavier.
blu_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:13 PM   #33
NESW20
2.1L 3SGTE
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MR2 Turbo & Tacoma
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 29
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
i'm very interested to see how it compares to my MR2...
__________________
1991 MR2 Turbo - 2.1L high compression stroker 3SGTE
2006 Tacoma 4x4 TRD Off Road - All-Pro front bumper, Old Man Emu shocks, Old Man Emu HD front coils, All-Pro leafs
1990 240SX Coupe - sold
2008 Civic Si Sedan
NESW20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:14 PM   #34
WingsofWar
MODERATOR-SAMA
 
WingsofWar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Swagtron Scooter
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 345
Thanked 1,562 Times in 524 Posts
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
with some considerable seat time in the AP1 S2k i wouldn't dare talk about performance vs performance factor against the Zx6. The AP1 has considerable advantage on a cumulative scale.

Despite that, the BRZ still has something unique to its character that makes me overall always choose the Zx6 over purchasing a s2000. They explain it pretty well in that article above, even if they omit more reasonable technical jargon.

While I have yet to drive the current MX-5 and BRZ and i have only a few hours of real seat time in a Z34 370z. I can pretty much gauge what kind of driving experience ill have with the BRZ, and its looking very positive.
__________________
WingsofWar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:14 PM   #35
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
The ap2 is heavier at 2800+ lbs. The ap1 is 2750 lbs.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:17 PM   #36
blu_
Senior Member
 
blu_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SWP BRZ LTD
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 889
Thanks: 637
Thanked 170 Times in 106 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You sure? I thought both were over 2800.
blu_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:21 PM   #37
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,048
Thanks: 7,728
Thanked 19,277 Times in 8,387 Posts
Mentioned: 696 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blu_ View Post
You sure? I thought both were over 2800.
Yes, you're correct both AP1 & AP2 is over 2800 lbs
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:22 PM   #38
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
S2k's CoG is estimated around 18.8~19.8.
*Estimated*

Quote:
FRS/BRZ claims 460mm (18.1"?),
*Claims*

Quote:
so about inch or 2 higher for S2k.
Not necessarily...

In any case, with a driver and fuel the FR-S/BRZ is going to be carrying 8% more weight on the fronts than the rears, whereas the S2000 will actually have ~2% more weight on the rears than fronts.

Even if the FR-S/BRZ c.g. is 1"-2" lower, I bet it is putting more load on the outside front while cornering (of course spring and sway bar rates play heavily in this).
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:24 PM   #39
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 4,011 Times in 2,097 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
Yes, you're correct both AP1 & AP2 is over 2800 lbs
My '01 is bone stock except for a 40 lb. roll bar. Weighed in at 2780 lb. at the track with ~1/8 tank of fuel (~10 lb.).

Pretty sure the early AP1s are closer to 2750 lb. and the AP2+ are ~2850 lb.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:26 PM   #40
blu_
Senior Member
 
blu_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SWP BRZ LTD
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 889
Thanks: 637
Thanked 170 Times in 106 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Subaru is known for saving weight, mainly because there drivetrain is so heavy because of awd. The body panels are so thin on my car the hood quivers on the highway.
blu_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:31 PM   #41
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,048
Thanks: 7,728
Thanked 19,277 Times in 8,387 Posts
Mentioned: 696 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
*Estimated*
Unless you can prove it wrong, my statement to be true

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
*Claims*
Yes, which they have posted/stated several official papers, so I'll take that as official #.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Not necessarily...

In any case, with a driver and fuel the FR-S/BRZ is going to be carrying 8% more weight on the fronts than the rears, whereas the S2000 will actually have ~2% more weight on the rears than fronts.

Even if the FR-S/BRZ c.g. is 1"-2" lower, I bet it is putting more load on the outside front while cornering (of course spring and sway bar rates play heavily in this).
I'll wait for your proof... til then it's your estimation

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
My '01 is bone stock except for a 40 lb. roll bar. Weighed in at 2780 lb. at the track with ~1/8 tank of fuel (~10 lb.).

Pretty sure the early AP1s are closer to 2750 lb. and the AP2+ are ~2850 lb.
*pretty sure* isn't a proof. Also show your S2k's curb weight doesn't mean anything. Dry weight, +-2700lbs for S2k is understandable
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 01:31 PM   #42
blu_
Senior Member
 
blu_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SWP BRZ LTD
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 889
Thanks: 637
Thanked 170 Times in 106 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
My '01 is bone stock except for a 40 lb. roll bar. Weighed in at 2780 lb. at the track with ~1/8 tank of fuel (~10 lb.).

Pretty sure the early AP1s are closer to 2750 lb. and the AP2+ are ~2850 lb.
Curb weight includes a full tank of gas. Which weights 8lbs per gallon.
blu_ is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nissan 370Z thread S2KtoFT86 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 116 04-07-2017 11:40 PM
FR-S vs. 370z, end all be all of discussions OldSkoolToys FR-S / BRZ vs.... 1491 09-25-2012 07:58 PM
BRZ vs 370z Video carbonBLUE FR-S / BRZ vs.... 48 04-17-2012 01:31 AM
FT 86 & 370Z similarities blur FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 11 10-05-2010 01:39 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.