follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-19-2011, 11:19 AM   #15
Impey Barbicane
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: Slow and old
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Pure, unadulterated fabrication meant to generate web site hits.

I would put good money on this: The Subaru and Toyota versions will be mechanically IDENTICAL at launch. I'm not confident enough to extend that to two years out, but at least initially the choice between the two will come down to brand preference, cosmetics, and interior appointments.
Impey Barbicane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 11:34 AM   #16
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeky View Post
Another 1k on the redline would make a huge power difference.
By itself 1k extra redline won't give you anything. The power band will already be dropping off before redline so extending that redline will just make it fall flat on it's face. Increasing redline without touching anything else is good for allowing upshifts to land you in the powerband right away but it's not good for more power without different internals and freeing flowing manifolds and possibly headwork depending on how well the heads flow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 View Post
I believe they are talking about a high revving 2.5l. It makes sense to have a different engine for the two models.
Possible but even harder to make a high revving 2.5L then the 2L probably. They could put in new cams, pistons, rods and crank if needed, etc rev it higher and make power.. whether or not it keeps fuel efficiency.. :shrug: :P

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonitti View Post
Pics of the tac on the VLN shows a redline of 7800rpms. Tac topped out at 9k rpms though.
Which pic? I thought it was 7300-7400?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fred_boosted View Post
I guess subie will have STi version of this thing...

30K - 2.0L tubro charged! 280~300 bhp
Subaru said they'd have an STI version more or less a LONG time ago. They've also said it will never be turbocharged repeatedly. Give up on that hope already, you'll just have to turbo it yourself.

I'd guess an STI version will be three years out. I'd be shocked if they did it in less considering the reasoning they gave for adding a higher performance version later was the extensive research and development money and time put into this project so the platform will have a long life. So I'd suspect continued development of the platform with minor changes here and there and major changes (performance versions, bumper/headlight/etc changes) after 3 years or so.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 11:34 AM   #17
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Impey Barbicane View Post
Pure, unadulterated fabrication meant to generate web site hits.

I would put good money on this: The Subaru and Toyota versions will be mechanically IDENTICAL at launch. I'm not confident enough to extend that to two years out, but at least initially the choice between the two will come down to brand preference, cosmetics, and interior appointments.
Oh and I agree with this.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 11:36 AM   #18
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I'd also bet that they'll be identical at launch. Maybe in the future they'll up the power for higher trim models, but I can't see it happening for at least a couple years.
n2oinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 12:17 PM   #19
82mm 4g63
4G63 & Rotary
 
82mm 4g63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: 92TalonAWD, 93RX7, 11F150EcoBoost
Location: Florida
Posts: 627
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to 82mm 4g63
The Toyota/Subaru/Yamaha trio would have to treat this engine like a motorcycle engine if they wanted to see near 300hp out of a 2.0L NA. Shave some weight off of the rotating assembly, balance and blueprint the block and rotating assembly, let it breath easier (maybe ITBs?), and add 2-2500 RPM to the redline.

If they can get 270whp out of a 1.6L Hayabusa engine, I'm confident Toyota/Subuar/Yamaha could get that out of a 2.0L Boxer engine. BUT I don't see them taking it to that extreme to save on some displacement. 2.5L seems more realistic, but a super high string 2.0L would be pretty damn cool.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeky View Post
Yeah i can see as much as 20-30bhp on a different ECU (Assuming the Toyota ECU is very restricted) but no more.

'less than 300bhp' is such a stupid thing for them to say. 1bhp is less than 300bhp!

Unless........ a boxer engine in theory should be able to rev higher than a I4 as it has an overall more balanced rotating assembly.... so why is it the FT86 shown at the VLN only had a 7400rpm redline compared to an S2000's 9k limit? What is stopping this engine from revving!?

Could it be that Toyota have restricted the redline to keep the power down on the entry level car to then be able to release a more powerful version where its a simple ECU change to up the redline?

Another 1k on the redline would make a huge power difference.

Stop playing silly games Toyota and give us some power figures already!
9K RPM out of a 2-2.2L isn't really that high of a redline for an inline engine. Assuming they did their due diligence and properly balanced the engine from the factory, a 9K redline won't throw the engine balance THAT far out of whack. If they thought the balance was an issue they would've thrown on a pair of balancer shafts. If you don't mind some vibration, in a sports car you shouldn't, balance isn't really that big of an issue.
82mm 4g63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 12:34 PM   #20
fred_boosted
Senior Member
 
fred_boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2008 EVO X GSR (Sold)
Location: USA
Posts: 100
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 View Post
I wonder if this comes straight out the ass of autocar or do they have a inside source?
They are guessing...

Maybe, dreaming about it.
fred_boosted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 12:55 PM   #21
Levi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Toyota
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 134
Thanked 138 Times in 90 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
That would be nice, as from the spyshots I like the Subaru fornt more than the Toyota front.

As for "much HP from ECU" is possible. I do not think the Subaru will be more powerful, but it is possible up to 250 PS. With different ECU, different headers and maybe even ITB, exclusivly for Subaru it could get 230 PS. But, note, if this ever happens, in terms of technical possibilities, it will not be a tuned FT-86 engine, but rather the other way round, the FT-86 will have a detuned BRZ engine. On a Mercedes C 63 AMG you can get 50 PS with only an ECU remap, because at the end that engine is a detuned version of the E 63 AMG.
Levi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 01:43 PM   #22
sfwg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2007 saturn ion(dd)
Location: tucson, az
Posts: 188
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
"The stability control system, for example, will allow a degree of drift before intervening."
sfwg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 01:46 PM   #23
Jordo!
Enjoy it, destroy it.
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Feh. I call shennanegans.

1. The Supra rumor is old foklore at this point... I doubt that's a real update. Wishful thinking, methinks.

2. 200 is already less than 300; I didn't see any claim the BRZ would be tuned to make any more power than its Toyota counterpart. Again, most likely wishful thinking.

See here: http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsAr...llCars/259183/
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 01:55 PM   #24
fernan2
Senior Member
 
fernan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: Wrx
Location: puerto rico
Posts: 374
Thanks: 49
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fred_boosted View Post
I guess subie will have STi version of this thing...

20K - 2.0L N/A 200 bhp

24~25K - 2.5 N/A 230~240 bhp

30K - 2.0L tubro charged! 280~300 bhp

Sport package of brembo brakes and stiffer springs. about 3K~4K.

wow, can't wait...

Lets turbo charge it!
Ok, this wont happen! Subaru is planning the next WRX (2013) to be a 2door sport car, so there is no way there going to take sales away from the WRX with a car that has the same power but is cheaper to get. That would be stupid for subaru!
fernan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 02:05 PM   #25
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Subaru will make the wrx a 2 door sports car? I highly doubt that fernan2. I need confirmation on that from a Subaru official.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 02:11 PM   #26
fernan2
Senior Member
 
fernan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: Wrx
Location: puerto rico
Posts: 374
Thanks: 49
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
[QUOTE=SUB-FT86;64993]Subaru will make the wrx a 2 door sports car? I highly doubt that fernan2. I need confirmation on that from a Subaru official.[/QUOT]

EDIT: ALL THIS ARE RUMORS.

Last edited by fernan2; 10-19-2011 at 02:38 PM.
fernan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 02:48 PM   #27
VenomRush
Thee O-ri-gi-na-tor
 
VenomRush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: So Cal
Posts: 948
Thanks: 59
Thanked 80 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by zigzagz94 View Post
"Subaru has confirmed to Autocar that there won’t be a turbocharged version or an all-wheel-drive BRZ and a convertible version has been ruled out."

"Power outputs, however, will differ with a Subaru-spec ECU liberating the BRZ’s power to “less than 300bhp,” compared with the FT-86’s 200bhp figure. "




Near 300hp out of a NA 2.0l is not going to happen with just ECU tuning.
well what the hell does honda know that everyone else doesn't
VenomRush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 04:19 PM   #28
zigzagz94
BRZerhood Lurker #13
 
zigzagz94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 15 DGM BRZ Premium
Location: charon's ferry
Posts: 892
Thanks: 377
Thanked 225 Times in 128 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post
200 is already less than 300; I didn't see any claim the BRZ would be tuned to make any more power than its Toyota counterpart.
The article states:

"Subaru-spec ECU liberating the BRZ’s power to 'less than 300bhp,' compared with the FT-86’s 200bhp figure."

Some people are taking that to mean that the BRZ will have more horsepower than the 200hp which the FT-86 will ship with. How much more, up to the 300hp mark, is anyones guess.

I have already thrown the challenge flag and agree with the others who think both cars will be exactly the same save for slight front/rear facia changes and different interiors.

Mid-cycle refresh is a whole different story though
zigzagz94 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is your prediction on FT86 power and Subaru 086a power? 86Fan Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 88 08-27-2013 12:49 AM
Rumor of the day Kids Heart Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 12 01-18-2011 10:09 AM
New rumor: Subaru FT-86 Version Could Have 60hp More Than Toyota FT-86 Hachiroku BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 37 08-20-2010 10:10 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.