follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2017, 08:57 AM   #15
SubieRumble
RWD Snob
 
SubieRumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: 2014 Ultramarine FRS MT
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 44
Thanks: 18
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yeah... Probably easier(and waaaaay cheaper) to pull your mods and revert to stock(or as close as possible) and trade with someone who regrets getting an auto. Swap everything over and presto!
__________________
Slow car fast. > Fast car slow.
SubieRumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 09:30 AM   #16
Dfyfzx
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: JRSC C38 HBP E85 FRS
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
The ECU's (engine control module) appear to be same hardware, between auto and manual. Wayno got a USA manual ecu and ran it in his Australian Auto car.


You will need to reflash the ECU with the appropriate auto rom with your turbo tune in it. You can force ecutek to do this, but you will need to get your tuner to provide you with the corresponding auto tune.


The dash cluster ,imobiliser ECU and key fobs are all part of a security set so any time you swap these components you will need to go through a procedure to sync them to security.


You will just need to reflash the ECU but to swap dash you will need to use the procedure in the service manual.


hopefully all the wiring loom is same and has poits to plug in all the auto trans control computers, also the VSC traction mich be different module and hopefully the extra console switches and flappy paddles connectors are all their . Their is also vaccumm pump for auto where the cam plate is on manuals, neutral switch instead of clutch switch and possibly heaps of other odds and ends.


you would want to do heaps of research.
Best answer so far... The odds and ends im sure would add up but all the weird stock parts I'd need are dirt cheap on eBay, it just depends how many of them there are. The wiring was my biggest concern. If it was a few days worth of swapping stock parts around, that wouldn't put me off. I was aware of needing it retuned so that's another expense. It's adding up...

And to those saying I'm being unfair to the stock transmission: I agree. It wasn't designed for this abuse, however, I've had MANY hot cars throughout the years and the only other car I've had that the transmission didn't feel completely stock after adding 100+ hp over stock was my S2000. Oddly enough, it was another Aisin transmission that's closely related to the 86 box. Like I already said, I added lots of go fast bits and now I have to baby my shifts and all the joy is drained from the experience. It's actually so obnoxious, I'm not sure I could even sell the car unless it was to another die hard 86 fan that's aware of the fact it's supposed to drive like crap after spending $15000 on the car. An 86 noob wouldnt touch this car with a ten foot pole!

If there was a bolt in swap kit that would cost less than $3000-$4000 completely done and driving, I'd be all over it! Hasn't happened yet. Or has it? Anyone aware of a shop throwing Cd009, r154, t56, etc. trannies in our cars for a few thousand out the door???
Dfyfzx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 10:13 AM   #17
Frishkorn
Hi everybody!
 
Frishkorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: 14 Whiteout FRS 6M. 16 Abyss iA 6A.
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 213
Thanks: 295
Thanked 80 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You already must have spent a ton of money getting it to 400HP. At this point you might as well spend some more and swap the transmission too.

This is why though I'm really second guessing boosting my FA20. More and more it seems the better way to go is swap the motor with a 2JZ-GTE and a V160.
Frishkorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 10:17 AM   #18
Dfyfzx
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: JRSC C38 HBP E85 FRS
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^ I bought it already mostly built. I wouldn't sink all that money into one, personally. 2j or LS swap is the way to go. You're going to spend the same amount if you do a built FA20 "right". I actually like the idea of a 1UZ swap but with the 2j and LS support already out there it would cost more and you'd end up with less.
Dfyfzx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dfyfzx For This Useful Post:
Frishkorn (02-07-2017)
Old 02-07-2017, 10:23 AM   #19
Frishkorn
Hi everybody!
 
Frishkorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: 14 Whiteout FRS 6M. 16 Abyss iA 6A.
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 213
Thanks: 295
Thanked 80 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dfyfzx View Post
^ I bought it already mostly built. I wouldn't sink all that money into one, personally. 2j or LS swap is the way to go. You're going to spend the same amount if you do a built FA20 "right". I actually like the idea of a 1UZ swap but with the 2j and LS support already out there it would cost more and you'd end up with less.
That's what has been great about these forums is learning every angle before jumping head first. If you would have asked me three years ago when I bought the car, I would have said I can't wait to turbo or supercharge it.

Then I started reading basically every part on this car is absolutely weak and once you hit about 350 HP / 250 TQ you're going to need to start replacing everything from the engine back. I understand they were trying to hit a price point, but it's going to break my heart losing the one part about the car that made it great. A lower CoG.

Shame you can't hit the lottery and throw in a dog box sequential!
Frishkorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 10:41 AM   #20
Dfyfzx
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: JRSC C38 HBP E85 FRS
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The amount of money some of these people spend on these cars is nuts! They could buy an NSX, Supra, Z06... I have $22,000 in my FRS and want to keep it under $30,000 all done and I'd still like a built bottom end eventually. If I hit 981 cayman money I'm going to be sick.
Dfyfzx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dfyfzx For This Useful Post:
Frishkorn (02-07-2017)
Old 02-07-2017, 10:50 AM   #21
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,292 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2498 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frishkorn View Post
That's what has been great about these forums is learning every angle before jumping head first. If you would have asked me three years ago when I bought the car, I would have said I can't wait to turbo or supercharge it.

Then I started reading basically every part on this car is absolutely weak and once you hit about 350 HP / 250 TQ you're going to need to start replacing everything from the engine back. I understand they were trying to hit a price point, but it's going to break my heart losing the one part about the car that made it great. A lower CoG.

Shame you can't hit the lottery and throw in a dog box sequential!
Hitting a price point, target weight, regulated emissions, safety requirements, ease of manufacture, standardized reparability, minimal parts stock held and probably a couple of more reasons I can't think of.
Why on earth would the car be designed for one horsepower and from the engine back be expected to hold up under more than twice what is expected?
If hitting those high numbers people need to be prepared to spend the bucks to bring the rest of the car up to the same level. Sounds like Dfy at least understands this concept even if he doesn't like the idea. There doesn't seem to be many options for built trannys for these cars yet and that sort of surprises me with the high HP some are pumping through them. Not sure if this ever went anyplace but may be a jump off point. http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=104875
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
Frishkorn (02-07-2017)
Old 02-07-2017, 10:57 AM   #22
jasonojordan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 satin white brz limited
Location: Cottage Grove MN
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 162
Thanked 511 Times in 326 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Hitting a price point, target weight, regulated emissions, safety requirements, ease of manufacture, standardized reparability, minimal parts stock held and probably a couple of more reasons I can't think of.
Why on earth would the car be designed for one horsepower and from the engine back be expected to hold up under more than twice what is expected?
If hitting those high numbers people need to be prepared to spend the bucks to bring the rest of the car up to the same level. Sounds like Dfy at least understands this concept even if he doesn't like the idea. There doesn't seem to be many options for built trannys for these cars yet and that sort of surprises me with the high HP some are pumping through them. Not sure if this ever went anyplace but may be a jump off point. http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=104875

I guess I'm not to surprised that there isn't alot out there for transmission options. 9/10 people who buy these cars are going to go poweeeeeer poweeerr mods must have powwwwwer. So thats where all the R&D and money is spent since thats what the masses want. The people that mod intelligently by building the car from the bottom up. tires wheel brakes transmission then go for the power are few and far between. I learned this mod method the hard way since I went the powwwwwweerr route on my 02 wrx with stock everything and it was a mess.
jasonojordan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jasonojordan For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (02-07-2017), x808drifter (02-07-2017)
Old 02-07-2017, 11:00 AM   #23
Frishkorn
Hi everybody!
 
Frishkorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: 14 Whiteout FRS 6M. 16 Abyss iA 6A.
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 213
Thanks: 295
Thanked 80 Times in 60 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Hitting a price point, target weight, regulated emissions, safety requirements, ease of manufacture, standardized reparability, minimal parts stock held and probably a couple of more reasons I can't think of.
Why on earth would the car be designed for one horsepower and from the engine back be expected to hold up under more than twice what is expected?
If hitting those high numbers people need to be prepared to spend the bucks to bring the rest of the car up to the same level. Sounds like Dfy at least understands this concept even if he doesn't like the idea. There doesn't seem to be many options for built trannys for these cars yet and that sort of surprises me with the high HP some are pumping through them. Not sure if this ever went anyplace but may be a jump off point. http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=104875
Poking around I saw that T5 swap as well. Looks interesting. But as much work as this block would take and money, I could sell the FA20 at a discount and get me to about half of what I would need for a used 2JZ. Having a daily driver, I wouldn't mind letting the FR-S sit in the garage so I can sell one motor and purchase the other in time.
Frishkorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 11:12 AM   #24
Dadhawk
Senior Member
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 19,982
Thanks: 39,364
Thanked 25,256 Times in 11,515 Posts
Mentioned: 186 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
..Why on earth would the car be designed for one horsepower and from the engine back be expected to hold up under more than twice what is expected?.
This.....

@Dfyfzx, definitely sounds like you know what the problem is and are heading in the right direction, but I think it is going to be much greater cost than just swapping out the transmission. There are a LOT of associated parts as others have said. In the end though, you have to consider the entire drivetrain when increasing HP that much, one of the reasons I don't do it. I could see increasing HP 10% to 25% and expecting other parts to work, but doubling it...not so much.

Anytime this subject comes up, I always think of this ad from Porsche that best explains what it takes to add a turbocharger at the factory....

__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.

Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S
Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark.
What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk".
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post:
Cole (02-07-2017), finch1750 (02-07-2017), haimichaeltran (02-10-2017), jasonojordan (02-07-2017), roddy (02-08-2017), soulreapersteve (02-08-2017), wparsons (02-07-2017)
Old 02-07-2017, 11:25 AM   #25
Dfyfzx
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: JRSC C38 HBP E85 FRS
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
That's a cool ad. Never seen it before.

I'm a very analytical guy and was well aware that the transmission wasn't designed for this much power, but I expected it to shift and function nearly like stock and then eventually let go. The fact they work great stock but then when you add power they cease to shift well kind of boggles my mind. The rpms and synchros I thought would be the same so I didn't expect driveability to be degraded. I fully expected the teeth on the gears, a shaft or a bearing to eventually let go.

Back on topic, I don't think I want to try a stock AT swap without knowing a specific parts list of everything that would be needed. The parts aren't expensive but 25 parts to buy at maybe $100 per part average adds up like crazy. Probably not worth it. Guess I'm holding out waiting on a shop to make a bolt in swap kit. It's crossed my mind to just sell the car and jump on an LS swapped car when one pops up...
Dfyfzx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dfyfzx For This Useful Post:
Dadhawk (02-07-2017), Tcoat (02-07-2017)
Old 02-07-2017, 11:35 AM   #26
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,841
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,292 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2498 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dfyfzx View Post
That's a cool ad. Never seen it before.

I'm a very analytical guy and was well aware that the transmission wasn't designed for this much power, but I expected it to shift and function nearly like stock and then eventually let go. The fact they work great stock but then when you add power they cease to shift well kind of boggles my mind. The rpms and synchros I thought would be the same so I didn't expect driveability to be degraded. I fully expected the teeth on the gears, a shaft or a bearing to eventually let go.

Back on topic, I don't think I want to try a stock AT swap without knowing a specific parts list of everything that would be needed. The parts aren't expensive but 25 parts to buy at maybe $100 per part average adds up like crazy. Probably not worth it. Guess I'm holding out waiting on a shop to make a bolt in swap kit. It's crossed my mind to just sell the car and jump on an LS swapped car when one pops up...
Not sure that just swapping for a stock At would fix your concern or just postpone the inevitable anyway. Did you see the info in that link I posted? Apparently there was a beefed up MT in the works but it doesn't say if it ever actually materialized.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
Dadhawk (02-07-2017)
Old 02-07-2017, 11:43 AM   #27
Dfyfzx
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Drives: JRSC C38 HBP E85 FRS
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I've been in contact with SpencerFab already. FullBlown can also get an R154 in the car with their existing V160 kit. I'm simply not excited about the T5 or R154 transmissions but if the price was right I guess it'd be a worthy option. The CD009 or Magnum XL is what I'd ideally pick if I had my way but if they're not supported... The car has only been out ~4 years and most of that time has been dedicated to power adders and chassis upgrades. I feel like we're finally to the point where people are starting to demand transmission work that can support the power mods. Just a matter of time. The more threads that we get going begging for transmission options, the more the shops and vendors will push the technology. Hopefully.
Dfyfzx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dfyfzx For This Useful Post:
Dadhawk (02-07-2017), jasonojordan (02-07-2017), Tcoat (02-07-2017), wparsons (02-07-2017)
Old 02-07-2017, 02:08 PM   #28
Dadhawk
Senior Member
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 19,982
Thanks: 39,364
Thanked 25,256 Times in 11,515 Posts
Mentioned: 186 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dfyfzx View Post
That's a cool ad. Never seen it before. ...
Yea, I particularly like the tag line. Plan, simple says it all.

Sort of like the old Bell helmet ad in back in the day that said "If you have a $10 head, wear a $10 helmet". I saw that when I was 10 and its stuck with me for over 40 years.
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.

Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S
Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark.
What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk".
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post:
roddy (02-08-2017)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentosin Trans Fluid Swap | Motul 300 Diff Swap | Impressions Dezoris Mechanical Maintenance (Oil, Fluids, Break-In, Servicing) 15 06-06-2017 10:54 PM
AT-->MT swap AlwaysSideways Want-To-Buy Requests 3 12-15-2014 11:14 AM
Is this project doable? (My dream build) Taisenki Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 17 10-29-2014 11:24 PM
Is this DoAble? poptopclk Forced Induction 22 06-20-2014 08:15 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.