follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2013, 10:48 PM   #141
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtmike View Post
It's secure. The resonator has some play in it when attached to the box so no loss in rigidity.

Also after having the resonator off and getting some more seat time in the induction noise is louder at about 2500-3000 rpms when the engine is under load. Not much difference in sound at other rpms.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
After my BRZedit custom dyno tune you can hear a noticed difference from 3k-redline.
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:09 PM   #142
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Also something to consider is the throttle body/after MAF is a bottle neck. there isn't really any reason to get an intake thats huge and not alter the throttle body. You wont see any real gains. My whole reason to delete the resonators is to get more sound from the intake, which i accomplished. Also the car seems to be extremely responsive and smooth after the tune. Don't really see the need for a CAI. I even try to convince someone to let me swap the CAI on the car and go get it retuned to see if there are any true gains with the drop in filter w/silicone inlet tube w/resonators deleted vs the CAI. But this is a maybe due to the fact it will cost me $200 bucks unless I can find a shop to do it for free purely for the community.
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:22 PM   #143
Turdinator
Señor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 769 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
Also something to consider is the throttle body/after MAF is a bottle neck. there isn't really any reason to get an intake thats huge and not alter the throttle body. You wont see any real gains. My whole reason to delete the resonators is to get more sound from the intake, which i accomplished. Also the car seems to be extremely responsive and smooth after the tune. Don't really see the need for a CAI. I even try to convince someone to let me swap the CAI on the car and go get it retuned to see if there are any true gains with the drop in filter w/silicone inlet tube w/resonators deleted vs the CAI. But this is a maybe due to the fact it will cost me $200 bucks unless I can find a shop to do it for free purely for the community.
From all reports the throttle body on our FA20 is huge for a 2lt engine. The manifold may present a bottleneck but i doubt the throttle body is.
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Turdinator For This Useful Post:
NickFRS (03-04-2013)
Old 03-04-2013, 11:23 PM   #144
vtmike
Senior Member
 
vtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Virginia
Posts: 477
Thanks: 80
Thanked 134 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
Also something to consider is the throttle body/after MAF is a bottle neck. there isn't really any reason to get an intake thats huge and not alter the throttle body. You wont see any real gains. My whole reason to delete the resonators is to get more sound from the intake, which i accomplished. Also the car seems to be extremely responsive and smooth after the tune. Don't really see the need for a CAI. I even try to convince someone to let me swap the CAI on the car and go get it retuned to see if there are any true gains with the drop in filter w/silicone inlet tube w/resonators deleted vs the CAI. But this is a maybe due to the fact it will cost me $200 bucks unless I can find a shop to do it for free purely for the community.
The stock throttle body is over sized and not a restriction. Most say there is no need to upgrade it.

I still think there are gains to be had in a good cai. Perrin said the gains they saw on their panel filter were actually more to do with changing the air/fuel ratio than air flow. Their cai still made more power than the drop in filter while running closer to stock a/f ratio.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
vtmike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to vtmike For This Useful Post:
NickFRS (03-04-2013)
Old 03-04-2013, 11:29 PM   #145
Cade01
Senior Member
 
Cade01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '13 White FR-S, 09 Triumph St.3 R
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 812
Thanks: 30
Thanked 135 Times in 106 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sierra View Post
Do you have yours with those 2 ports open for extra airflow?
If so have you noticed any gains at the top end?
I haven't removed the resonators on the snorkel yet, just all the others. I can't really say on the top end gains, I installed the Nameless Performance cat less front pipe, axle back, and a K&N filter at pretty much the same time, so I'm feeling some pretty big gains on the butt dyno.
Cade01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:29 PM   #146
sierra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Skoda Yeti DSG diesel 4x4
Location: W. Australia
Posts: 1,203
Thanks: 336
Thanked 307 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
Also something to consider is the throttle body/after MAF is a bottle neck. there isn't really any reason to get an intake thats huge and not alter the throttle body. You wont see any real gains. My whole reason to delete the resonators is to get more sound from the intake, which i accomplished. Also the car seems to be extremely responsive and smooth after the tune. Don't really see the need for a CAI. I even try to convince someone to let me swap the CAI on the car and go get it retuned to see if there are any true gains with the drop in filter w/silicone inlet tube w/resonators deleted vs the CAI. But this is a maybe due to the fact it will cost me $200 bucks unless I can find a shop to do it for free purely for the community.
You guys beat me to it!!!:happy0180:

The throttle body internal diameter is 65mm which is exactly twice the cross sectional area of the 46mm internal dia of the stock cold air intake.
This snorkel is looking like a must fix item.
sierra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:33 PM   #147
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtmike View Post
The stock throttle body is over sized and not a restriction. Most say there is no need to upgrade it.

I still think there are gains to be had in a good cai. Perrin said the gains they saw on their panel filter were actually more to do with changing the air/fuel ratio than air flow. Their cai still made more power than the drop in filter while running closer to stock a/f ratio.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
I have a hard time believing this because my car was running extremely rich even with the silicone inlet tube and drop in filter before my tune. I mean clouds of black smoke rich.
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:35 PM   #148
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sierra View Post
You guys beat me to it!!!:happy0180:

The throttle body internal diameter is 65mm which is exactly twice the cross sectional area of the 46mm internal dia of the stock cold air intake.
This snorkel is looking like a must fix item.
In this case i'm feeling a need of moding before my car goes back on the dyno this week! Good to know. Thanks for the info folks. :happy0180:
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:39 PM   #149
sierra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Skoda Yeti DSG diesel 4x4
Location: W. Australia
Posts: 1,203
Thanks: 336
Thanked 307 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
I have a hard time believing this because my car was running extremely rich even with the silicone inlet tube and drop in filter before my tune. I mean clouds of black smoke rich.
The drop in filter and silicone inlet tube must have altered the speed of the air through the MAF sensor and caused the ECU to supply more fuel than was actually required.
sierra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:39 PM   #150
vtmike
Senior Member
 
vtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Virginia
Posts: 477
Thanks: 80
Thanked 134 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
I have a hard time believing this because my car was running extremely rich even with the silicone inlet tube and drop in filter before my tune. I mean clouds of black smoke rich.
I'm not saying it was running lean but more lean than the stock filter according to perrin. They seem very thorough and transparent in their testing.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
vtmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:44 PM   #151
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtmike View Post
I'm not saying it was running lean but more lean than the stock filter according to perrin. They seem very thorough and transparent in their testing.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
"Testing" is very hard to put data back to back. Unless the dyno pulls were in the same temp on the same dyno on the same day. Simply changing the temperature of air changes how much air is needed or how the car reacts. This also can change the amount of power the car makes. Unless they do back to back testing with parts I don't exactly trust data. Also it would be better if they used percentages then actual HP readings. I made a post about this and they ignored me lol
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 11:47 PM   #152
vtmike
Senior Member
 
vtmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: Virginia
Posts: 477
Thanks: 80
Thanked 134 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
"Testing" is very hard to put data back to back. Unless the dyno pulls were in the same temp on the same dyno on the same day. Simply changing the temperature of air changes how much air is needed or how the car reacts. This also can change the amount of power the car makes. Unless they do back to back testing with parts I don't exactly trust data. Also it would be better if they used percentages then actual HP readings. I made a post about this and they ignored me lol
Their methods seem pretty legit to me.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
vtmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 12:11 AM   #153
Turdinator
Señor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 769 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickFRS View Post
I have a hard time believing this because my car was running extremely rich even with the silicone inlet tube and drop in filter before my tune. I mean clouds of black smoke rich.
Interesting. I have a Perrin foam filter and their silicon intake due to me this week. I will have to watch for this. Did you reset the ECU after install?
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 12:28 AM   #154
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turdinator View Post
Interesting. I have a Perrin foam filter and their silicon intake due to me this week. I will have to watch for this. Did you reset the ECU after install?
Yup! Keep in mind this was at 6k-redline hard shifts.
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stock resonator removal? jm1681 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 33 10-11-2019 07:58 PM
MT Stock Shift Knob, Stock Intake w/Snorkel Vicious LED Interior Parts (Incl. Lighting) 1 02-09-2013 04:14 PM
Length of stock resonator? jm1681 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 5 10-26-2012 08:25 AM
WTB Stock OEM Airbox/snorkel brichard0625 Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 1 10-20-2012 10:21 AM
WTB: Stock AirBox SkullWorks Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 1 08-15-2012 10:09 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.