Induction Poll - NA, Supercharger, or Turbo - Page 2 - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

Neutral_Eyes · 12-02-2011, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giccin

FFS....

Nah, they make the Miata superchargers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by c0rbin

Uh, I'm not trolling, I'm serious.

WingsofWar · 12-02-2011, 03:52 PM

maybe i should make a counter-poll
Arc Reactor vs Flux Capacitor vs Mr. Fusion vs Solar Furnace

c0rbin · 12-02-2011, 03:53 PM

So far, you have conversed with me entirely in pictures. And I'm the troll? Do you even know what "trolling" means?

WingsofWar · 12-02-2011, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bambbrose

For autox, I think NA would be best.

For time attack, it would really need to be AWD to pull the big numbers in street form. There is simply a limit to the amount of power you can transmit to the pavement with only 2 wheels.

edit: I feeeded it

Its all about balance and lightness..the FRS doesn't need high HP or AWD to make very fast times. It just needs to play to its strengths. Make Full use of that super low COG and a 2000-2500lbs dry chassis.

Now if your talking about breaking time barriers in the 2wd catagory, like in Tskuba. RX7 is a competitive beast. The SuperNow 600hp FC3S did Tskuba recently in 54 sec.

fasteddy91 · 12-02-2011, 04:17 PM

2GR

Snoopyalien24 · 12-02-2011, 04:18 PM

Ill supercharge my turbocharger's supercharger

ft86Fan · 12-02-2011, 05:20 PM

Supercharger definitely.

Syldrin · 12-02-2011, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aki

2JZ-GE engine swap with twin turbos. Better yet the 1GZ V12 from the Toyota Century. Because power is the only thing that counts.

Aki totally should do an LS9 swap.

Levi · 12-02-2011, 05:38 PM

I voted NA because it is still my favorite. In the case of the GT86/BRZ, one wanting more power will need more displacement, what is limited by the engine block, or just another bigger engine, what may not go into the engine bay. Now on the stock engine I would prefere a supercharger if I will want more power. I would also go for a turbo engine if it is done by Subaru STI. I wouldn't go aftermarket turbo charger as it would be a simple setup and have turbolag. It won't be any twin-scroll turbocharger.

Ryephile · 12-02-2011, 05:47 PM

N/A = Pure
Turbo = Laggy dyno queen disconnected throttle response
Supercharger = enhanced N/A with emotional and acoustic corruption

For me, N/A is ideal. I'm all for a good TVS or twin-screw if N/A doesn't get the job done. Turbo's are for Diesels, rally cars, or dyno queens, but don't belong in a simple/pure sports car like the FT-86.

If none of that works, an Arc Reactor sounds like hella fun.

Syldrin · 12-02-2011, 05:49 PM

you forgot drifters ryephile in your turbo analogy

Neutral_Eyes · 12-02-2011, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by syldrin

you forgot drifters ryephile in your turbo analogy

Only because they're too prideful to toss an LSx in everything like they should.

Ryephile · 12-02-2011, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neutral_Eyes

Only because they're too prideful to toss an LSx in everything like they should.

LOL! LSx engines are fantastic [and a benchmark example of what makes N/A so great, mind you]. I not-so-secretly want a Corvette solely for its engine.

WingsofWar · 12-02-2011, 10:57 PM

LSx in a FD3S is tits.. i couldn't believe the LSx engine weighed the same as my 13b rotary.

View Poll Results: Induction options
NA	44	41.90%
Turbo	25	23.81%
Supercharged	36	34.29%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

12-02-2011, 03:52 PM	#16
WingsofWar MODERATOR-SAMA Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: Swagtron Scooter Location: Seattle Posts: 2,685 Thanks: 345 Thanked 1,562 Times in 524 Posts Mentioned: 81 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	maybe i should make a counter-poll Arc Reactor vs Flux Capacitor vs Mr. Fusion vs Solar Furnace __________________

12-02-2011, 04:17 PM	#19
fasteddy91 Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Drives: 1991 MR2 Turbo Location: Northern California Posts: 14 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	2GR __________________ 1991 MR2 Turbo-Weekend car 2002 TRD Celica GTS 6spd-Daily Driver 2008 IS350-Daily Driver-SOLD Soon to buy ... FR-S, BRZ, Genesis coupe, G37, A5 or Lexus IS coupe with a manual tranny.

12-02-2011, 04:18 PM	#20
Snoopyalien24 Mr. Sarcasm Join Date: Sep 2011 Drives: 2016 VW Jetta TSI Sport 5-Speed Location: South Florida Posts: 3,729 Thanks: 1,275 Thanked 753 Times in 491 Posts Mentioned: 34 Post(s) Tagged: 4 Thread(s)	Ill supercharge my turbocharger's supercharger __________________ Get your very own FT86CLUB T-shirts/keychains/goodies! CLICK HERE ]

12-02-2011, 05:20 PM	#21
ft86Fan Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Drives: FR-S, Exige S, Miata Location: Basking Ridge NJ Posts: 798 Thanks: 327 Thanked 131 Times in 80 Posts Mentioned: 2 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Supercharger definitely. __________________ '13 Scion FR-S (Whiteout) '07 Lotus Exige S (Aspen White) Touring, Traction, Starshield '95 Miata (Montego Blue)

12-02-2011, 03:53 PM	#17
c0rbin Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Drives: 97' 240SX Location: US Posts: 69 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	So far, you have conversed with me entirely in pictures. And I'm the troll? Do you even know what "trolling" means?

12-02-2011, 05:38 PM	#23
Levi Senior Member Join Date: May 2011 Drives: Toyota Location: Germany Posts: 1,202 Thanks: 134 Thanked 138 Times in 90 Posts Mentioned: 5 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I voted NA because it is still my favorite. In the case of the GT86/BRZ, one wanting more power will need more displacement, what is limited by the engine block, or just another bigger engine, what may not go into the engine bay. Now on the stock engine I would prefere a supercharger if I will want more power. I would also go for a turbo engine if it is done by Subaru STI. I wouldn't go aftermarket turbo charger as it would be a simple setup and have turbolag. It won't be any twin-scroll turbocharger.

12-02-2011, 05:47 PM	#24
Ryephile Hot Dog Join Date: Apr 2011 Drives: quicker than arghx7 Location: Metro Detroit Posts: 1,316 Thanks: 103 Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts Mentioned: 6 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	N/A = Pure Turbo = Laggy dyno queen disconnected throttle response Supercharger = enhanced N/A with emotional and acoustic corruption For me, N/A is ideal. I'm all for a good TVS or twin-screw if N/A doesn't get the job done. Turbo's are for Diesels, rally cars, or dyno queens, but don't belong in a simple/pure sports car like the FT-86. If none of that works, an Arc Reactor sounds like hella fun. __________________ "Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience." Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.

12-02-2011, 05:49 PM	#25
Syldrin Troll Feeder Join Date: Nov 2011 Drives: boosted scion tc. Location: camp pendleton Posts: 568 Thanks: 14 Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	you forgot drifters ryephile in your turbo analogy

12-02-2011, 10:57 PM	#28
WingsofWar MODERATOR-SAMA Join Date: Oct 2009 Drives: Swagtron Scooter Location: Seattle Posts: 2,685 Thanks: 345 Thanked 1,562 Times in 524 Posts Mentioned: 81 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	LSx in a FD3S is tits.. i couldn't believe the LSx engine weighed the same as my 13b rotary. __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Supercharger or Turbo ?	#87	Forced Induction	192	01-25-2013 11:20 AM
Color Poll	markitect	Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum	48	01-13-2012 09:59 AM
Acoustic Control Induction System	Siriusly.Andrew	Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions	6	03-19-2011 11:57 PM
Geneva Preview: Techart to debut 911 Turbo, Turbo S	vh_supra26	Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions	1	02-22-2010 07:20 PM

User Name		Remember Me?
Password