|
||||||
| Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#29 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ in WRB--let's mod!!!
Location: Central, FL
Posts: 1,224
Thanks: 317
Thanked 449 Times in 262 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
+ a bazillion lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: BRZ
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 336
Thanks: 15
Thanked 123 Times in 68 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
We have been running the Koni/RCE setup with AST camber plates for a while now and love it. It has a perfect balance with -2.7* of camber front and -1.8 rear 0 toe front and +.15 toe rear. Wouldn't change a thing!
Tony |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
My plans are very similar to the OP's, but with the addition of rear camber adjustment and replacing every stock bushing I can. I'm waiting to see what comes from Bilstein and I'm holding off on sway bars for now.
I really wasn't sure about the yellows as I was worried they would be too stiff and too low. But, I feel the stock front springs are much too soft for the car. I had talked to RCE a while ago and we both concluded I'd be a good candidate for regular guy springs, but the more I thought about it the more I don't think there will be a black spring for this car. The difference between the ~215# of the stock FRS rear spring and the 250# of the RCE's just doesn't leave room for something in between. So, I've decided to go with the Yellows. Tony, I like the idea of the WL Com-c top hats as they shouldn't knock or rattle, how have the AST plates been? How long have you been running them? |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |||
|
Tells it like it is
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: SS1LE | F150 Diesel | Civic | S3
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 823
Thanks: 62
Thanked 279 Times in 122 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I've done the coilover thing, I've done the spring/shock combo thing. Ultimately, I've learned over the years my own tastes and this combo suits them.
__________________
-Seven || youtube.com/turnsevenvideo
![]() 2012 C6 Grand Sport 4LT 2015 Mazda 3i-T/Tech |
|||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to seven For This Useful Post: | whataboutbob (01-11-2013) |
|
|
#33 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Asphalt
Location: Brookville PA
Posts: 345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I've said this once, I will say it again. I think it's kind of nuts that most everyone is running higher rear rate than front. I run the exact opposite, WITH my hollow 22mm bar. The OP will be running equal rates front to rear, so I think a bit more front bar is appropriate, but 1" is far too much. MHO. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Sam Strano For This Useful Post: | Calum (01-14-2013) |
|
|
#34 |
|
Vtec Jesus
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 13 Golf R, 15 Audi S4
Location: LSD
Posts: 1,165
Thanks: 623
Thanked 243 Times in 153 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Buy quality coilovers and proper camber adjustable components and call it a day. Idk how coilover = hard parker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Tells it like it is
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: SS1LE | F150 Diesel | Civic | S3
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 823
Thanks: 62
Thanked 279 Times in 122 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Nothing wrong with this per se, but its more costly for similar performance is all. If you don't need height adjustment, I don't see a downside.
__________________
-Seven || youtube.com/turnsevenvideo
![]() 2012 C6 Grand Sport 4LT 2015 Mazda 3i-T/Tech |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to seven For This Useful Post: | Calum (01-14-2013) |
|
|
#36 | |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Sent from mission control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Asphalt
Location: Brookville PA
Posts: 345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
![]() What's more, I'm not manipulating the results with crazy camber splits either, I run only about -.25 more degrees in front than the rear. I guess I'm meaning to point out it's not like I'm getting balance running -2.5F, -1R. In fact I'm only running about -2.25 front with the option for more should I want it. ![]() This is EXACTLY what I was talking about. We aren't talking about a nose-heavy Subaru with a lousy camber curve here. What you'd think on paper isn't always the case in reality. The rear suspension is sticky on this car for one. Tell me how I got a 2001 Camaro to turn on 600/150 springs with a 35mm front bar, 22mm bar when they were pushy on the stock springs and bars that were 292/115 and 30/19 (or an optional setup of 360/180 and 32/19 bar). You'd think that car would have pushed like a tank, right? Well, there is video on my site of it too.... I think a picture (moving in this case) is worth a thousand words. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
So what I am getting out of this sway bar discussion is the typical behavior expected when upgrading sway bars and spring stiffness don't apply to this car for some reason.
So what are the rules now? How do we make educated guesses/decisions. Rely on what people have actually tested on the track I guess? So 22 mm / stock rear does not push? How does this combo feel? What would be a better combo if any? |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Asphalt
Location: Brookville PA
Posts: 345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 223 Times in 108 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I'm not saying that none of the rules apply. Just that it's not so black and white, there is a LOT involved in making a car balanced and driveable.
An FR-S is a pretty nervous little beast. That's what I have. The Subaru is tuned to be a bit more forgiving and stable, and that's no secret. But did you notice that when magazines drive them, they don't say the Subaru is a pushy pig and the Scion is loose as hell? Well, some say the Scion is a big, shall we say, free (and I'd agree). What were the "rules" before, and on what car? Sure if you put a massive front bar on and nothing else, it's going to understeer at the limit. I'm not advocating a massive front bar. Bars and springs both add wheel rate, so if you must keep an eye on how much of each you adding and where. My car doesn't push with my hollow 22 front and a stock rear.... and I'm running stiffer front springs than rears too.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Sam Strano For This Useful Post: | Calum (01-15-2013) |
|
|
#41 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: BRZ
Location: Aus
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Why didn't you consider getting the ground control kit ? Almost the same price for the street kit, uses custom valved koni singled with eibach springs and height adjustment for $200 more?
I get your point about only adjusting height once but springs always look lopsided, nice to have that fine adjustment I guess and room for wider wheels. Either way your setup is great nonetheless Nd looking forward to some pictures ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Tells it like it is
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: SS1LE | F150 Diesel | Civic | S3
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 823
Thanks: 62
Thanked 279 Times in 122 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Nothing wrong with GC, I just decided it's not the route I wanted to go. *edit* Sam posted the real reasons below, I was trying to be *nice* per se.
__________________
-Seven || youtube.com/turnsevenvideo
![]() 2012 C6 Grand Sport 4LT 2015 Mazda 3i-T/Tech Last edited by seven; 01-15-2013 at 03:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adjustable shocks+ springs vs Coilovers | CyberFormula | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 44 | 06-08-2013 04:59 PM |
| Coil springs on OEM shocks | Mikepage | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 54 | 01-04-2013 08:22 PM |
| How often to rebuild coilovers or stock shocks? | stockysnail | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 3 | 12-24-2012 01:54 PM |
| Coilovers vs Springs – What are coilovers and what’s better? | phenom86 | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 3 | 07-30-2012 01:24 AM |
| Matching shocks with springs | Ben_G | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 14 | 07-22-2012 10:32 PM |