|
||||||
| Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#57 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: BRZ
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 736
Thanks: 996
Thanked 268 Times in 180 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Seems like 20mm-40mm is recommended per Moto-P, but he doesn't mention using plates or adjusters. Last edited by BRZranger; 09-09-2012 at 10:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '13 SWP BRZ-L
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 252
Thanks: 70
Thanked 106 Times in 68 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Great thread! Quality posts by the OP, and very informative as well.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: '97 RSP JZZ30 GT-T
Location: Australia
Posts: 612
Thanks: 365
Thanked 192 Times in 101 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I want to retain the stock handling characteristics as much as possible while achieving a 0.8-1inch drop. So all I need for this is some lowering springs? Should I get camber correction kit or anything of that sort?
__________________
Germans>Japanese>Italians>Americans. Unless its a Corvette. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: PA
Posts: 683
Thanks: 106
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm in the same boat in terms of my goals. I decided to go with the RCE Yellow springs LITE starter pack that comes with the 20mm drop springs, oem front camber bolts, and whiteline rear camber bushings. I don't have it installed yet so I can't give real feedback. But after doing lots of reading on the forum and asking for advice from people, this sounded like one of the best options for a slight drop with an emphasis on handling.
Last edited by Phaedrus29; 09-26-2012 at 03:21 PM. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Phaedrus29 For This Useful Post: | czar07 (09-26-2012) |
|
|
#62 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: '97 RSP JZZ30 GT-T
Location: Australia
Posts: 612
Thanks: 365
Thanked 192 Times in 101 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Germans>Japanese>Italians>Americans. Unless its a Corvette. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Quote:
The front bolts are like 10 bucks and an easy install. They really help handling a LOT too. Zero reason not to do those in my opinion. The rear camber bushings are recommended but they are a little bit of a pain to install. It does help you dial camber down to a better range for more ideal handling and tire wear, but you can get away without them. You just end up with a little too much rear camber. - Andrew |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Ultramarine
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 959
Thanks: 288
Thanked 560 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'd like to add something that I've been lead to understand. Correct me if I'm wrong.
The car diving does not cause weight transfer. Weight transfer causes dive. What dive does give you is a gentler weight transfer (There's some time delay as the springs are weighted, compressed, and then transfer weight to the front tires), which gives the driver A. a bit more time to react and B. more obvious feedback as to how much weight is being transferred. Weight transfer is a function of CG and acceleration force only. Say you're braking at 1 g (Pulling that out of my rear because I know the math, dunno what a realistic hard braking g loading is). That means your car is decellerating at ~32ft/s^2. Basically, for each second that goes by, your car is going 32 ft/s slower. or 9.81 m/s slower per second, 9.81 m/s^2. I'm going to use metric from here on out because it makes my life easier and the numbers are as if not more easy to understand. I don't feel like getting into slugs or pound mass units and the accompanying explanation in this thread. A=9.81 m/s M=1270 kg (~2800 lb) So. Force = mass x acceleration. F = 1270 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 = 12458.7 kg*m/s^2 = 12358.7 Newtons. Now that we have our braking force, we can determine our effective weight transfer. The weight of the car doesn't really transfer front to rear. There is a moment arm between the tire's contact patch and the center of gravity that basically "twists" the car forward. Because of the nature of moments, centers of gravity etc, it doesn't really matter if the force is coming from the front or rear. It affects whether the tires can take the strain and keep their grip, but total force wise it works out approximately the same, so lets say that our moment arm goes directly down from our CG and acts in plane with the tire's contact patch. The CG is proportedly at 18" above this point, which is ~.457 m .457 m * 12358.1 N = 5693.63 N-m. This is our moment caused by our braking decelleration. To find out the effective weight transfer, we take this moment, and balance it with a reacting force at the front tires. Because we're taking everything in reference to the CG, we can neglect the static forces present at all times from the actual force of the car being pressed down by gravity as it will be equal front and rear. Additionally, when pitching forward, there is no added force in the rear as the tires do not have suction cups on them. So. Knowing the weight distribution (53/47) and the wheelbase (101.2 in) we can determine the horizontal distance from the front wheels to the CG. (101.2 * .47 = 47.564 in = 1.21 M) Taking this number and dividing our moment by it results in 4705.48 N. This is equal to 1057.8 lb of force being applied to the front wheels and effectively taken away from the rear. It's taken away from the rear because the total reaction force applied by the ground to the car must always equal that of gravity pushing the car down (or the combined forces of gravity and aero), otherwise the car would cease to be a car and become an airplane. Pitching of the car does very little to change the magnitude of this weight transfer. It does not change the car's weight, and it usually changes the car's Cg location very little in the vertical plane. What it does do, as I said before, is give the driver a good indication of what is happening, giving a novice driver big hints as to how the weight is being transferred. It also has a delaying effect on the weight transfer, making things more gradual. If the car had no suspension this weight transfer would be instantaneous. This is why riding on the bumpstops gives such unpredictable handling. Moto-P is definitely right on one thing. Too stiff a suspension on weak tires can lead to scary things, as the tires load and unload so quickly and the threshold is so low that it can be difficult for even a good driver to feel things in time. ![]() Nathan |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
TEQSPORT Brand Manager
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: '24 GR86 + '16 FR-S
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 3,725
Thanked 4,137 Times in 1,707 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
bump, I love this thread!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Scion FR-S 2013 Raven
Location: Canada
Posts: 690
Thanks: 380
Thanked 186 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Me to ;p
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Civic
Location: NY
Posts: 197
Thanks: 75
Thanked 82 Times in 56 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Great thread. I hope the Eibach Pro kit maintains balance of car for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Boosted Noob
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS MT KW SC, '05 4Runner 4WD
Location: SoCal
Posts: 883
Thanks: 353
Thanked 343 Times in 175 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So is the consensus Eibach Pro kit for moderate aesthetic-driven drop to still maintain the good handling with stock struts/shocks? Seems like the Pro kit is still stiffer than stock, though. Also, how would sway bars and strut bars add to this equation / artform?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
AutoX-10/10ths every run
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S AT Firestorm
Location: San Marcos, CA, USA
Posts: 2,611
Thanks: 4,845
Thanked 1,882 Times in 1,025 Posts
Mentioned: 79 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I've got a set of RaceCompEng springs in a box on the floor waiting for a full Whiteline setup to arrive. I plan to start a personal build thread once everything arrives. Stay posted for details.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to whataboutbob For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#70 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 4Runner
Location: N. Utah
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 684
Thanked 392 Times in 252 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I've been holding out for the new Sprint springs.
__________________
diirk
waiting on a Neptune Premium MT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Remotely lower windows with key fob? | Kido1986 | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics | 25 | 07-16-2012 11:11 PM |
| Lower car 1.5 - 2.0 inches | F3dzo | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 17 | 06-23-2012 10:30 PM |
| BRZ spotted in lower mainland! | kidgogeta | CANADA | 21 | 04-29-2012 03:20 PM |
| Stock ride height or lower? | StevenDavisPhoto | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 156 | 01-31-2012 11:58 AM |
| Lower ride height in NYC? | blur | NY / NJ / CT / PA | 9 | 01-19-2012 07:31 PM |