|
|
#365 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
Quote:
The Southbend is 400tq, so that could work. Organic disk and sprung are two big positives.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | DarkPira7e (12-12-2022) |
|
|
#366 | |
|
Rust bucket enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2013 Turbo Firestorm FRS
Location: Vermont
Posts: 4,073
Thanks: 3,335
Thanked 4,222 Times in 2,122 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Turbo FR-S Build - Build Thread
JDL EL Recirc manifold, Boostlab BL58x Turbo w/ T51R, 17x9 ARC-8, IAG block |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DarkPira7e For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (12-12-2022) |
|
|
#367 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
It is pretty good for the price too. I don’t know if the Southbend would exceed its quoted torque rating like the Exedy, but like I said, the Exedy seems to be quoting OEM longevity with regular use and not a real torque limit. Clearly the transmission can exceed the torque limit of like 176tq or something, so I think they are underrated because they need to last 200k miles or something. I would hate to get the Southbend to find its limit is a hard 400tq at the flywheel. That puts it around 320wtq and I’m about there with the Exedy.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | DarkPira7e (12-12-2022) |
|
|
#368 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
I guess the other thing is apparently Southbend uses Exedy clutches, but rebuilds them. I don’t know if the Southbend stage 3 is just an Exedy stage 1 or 2 pressure plate with the Exedy stage 1 organic disc that has been replaced with their components. Maybe I’ll email Southbend.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | DarkPira7e (12-12-2022) |
|
|
#369 | |
|
Rust bucket enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2013 Turbo Firestorm FRS
Location: Vermont
Posts: 4,073
Thanks: 3,335
Thanked 4,222 Times in 2,122 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Turbo FR-S Build - Build Thread
JDL EL Recirc manifold, Boostlab BL58x Turbo w/ T51R, 17x9 ARC-8, IAG block |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#370 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
Quote:
My Exedy stage 1 looked like a slightly thicker toothed pressure plate with a different compound on the clutch disc when I compared it to the stock Exedy clutch. I don’t know if Exedy’s stage 1 and 2 are identical pressure plates with different clutch disc materials and shapes or if the fingers are actually thicker. I guess I’m wondering because if they are the same and the Southbend is using the same pressure plate then all I would need is a new clutch disc.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | DarkPira7e (12-12-2022), RedReplicant (12-12-2022) |
|
|
#371 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Regardless, Southbend emailed me. The Southbend Stage 3 Daily organic disc is listed as 400 fwtq on their website and the Stage 3 Endurance kevlar disc is 450 fwtq. The Endurance disc is what they recommended for daily use to hold my power goals. They said the drag 500 fwtq one would be miserable for daily use. They also said every kit is modified Exedy components. They said even their Stage 1 pressure plate is modified even though it uses the stock/Exedy organic disc. I emailed them back to make 100% sure the pressure plate is significantly different and not just a repainted Exedy part. It makes no sense to spend a grand on a clutch kit if I already own the same pressure plate and all that is different is the clutch disc. Same can be said for the difference between the Exedy Stage 1 and Stage 2; might as well just buy the disc since the pressure plates are identical, if someone was going to upgrade with them. https://www.southbendclutch.com/reso...formance-kits/
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | DarkPira7e (12-12-2022), RedReplicant (12-12-2022) |
|
|
#372 | |
|
Rust bucket enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2013 Turbo Firestorm FRS
Location: Vermont
Posts: 4,073
Thanks: 3,335
Thanked 4,222 Times in 2,122 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Turbo FR-S Build - Build Thread
JDL EL Recirc manifold, Boostlab BL58x Turbo w/ T51R, 17x9 ARC-8, IAG block |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DarkPira7e For This Useful Post: | RedReplicant (12-12-2022) |
|
|
#373 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
Quote:
I remember measuring the fingers on the OEM vs Stage 1, and there was a slight increase in thickness in the sheet metal like a 14g vs 16g or something. If I go this route, I'll see if the metal is a different thickness, and I suppose I would know too by increased clamping force. The question is do I wait and do a CD009 or T56 or BMW swap, or do I just do a second gen swap? -Pros of the second gen swap: --Compatibility with what I already have. --About $2k for a clutch and used tranny. --No major modifications needed. --Uses 86 clutch kits. --Uses thin and steel flywheel. -Cons: --Unknown/limited potential --Less reliability. --Can't work with dual clutch kits. -Pros of CD009/T56/BMW swap: --Higher potential --More reliable --More high tq clutch kits available --Could sell old parts like adapter, trans mount, flywheel, etc. -Cons: --Price is probably a grand or two higher (used CD009), depending on resale value of what I have right now, but might be more for new CD009/Magnum. --Likely using thicker flywheel meaning more vibration potential --More cutting, hammering, modifying parts.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#374 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
On another note: I noticed that the fuel pressure gauge was showing fuel pressure in the forties on idle like around 48psi. It was like 62psi I thought, so I don't know why it is lower on idle. Despite the fuel pulse damper (FPD), it seems like the gauge is flickering again, but not as bad as it was before the FPD, yet not rock solid like it was after the FPD. I'm not sure if this is a problem or not or how long it has been low, or if it is a consequence of installing the fire ring and the tune is trying to correct something, or if the in-tank fuel pressure regulator is getting old or if the fuel filter is getting clogged or what, but I don't know that it matters because I will be removing everything very soon to do the return system conversion.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#375 | |
|
Rust bucket enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2013 Turbo Firestorm FRS
Location: Vermont
Posts: 4,073
Thanks: 3,335
Thanked 4,222 Times in 2,122 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Turbo FR-S Build - Build Thread
JDL EL Recirc manifold, Boostlab BL58x Turbo w/ T51R, 17x9 ARC-8, IAG block |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DarkPira7e For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (12-13-2022) |
|
|
#376 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
Quote:
https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=97827 The CD009 is pretty close. Slightly shorter gearing. https://www.ft86club.com/forums/show...75&postcount=8 A used CD009 would be marginally more expensive in price than a second gen, depending on the miles, but way more miles. Definitely cheaper than a new T56 Magnum at $3.5k or a new CD009 at $2k, which is about the price of a new 86 tranny. I think I can get a low mileage second gen 86 tranny for $1.2k. A CD009 is $750-1750 depending on the miles, but most have 80K-150k miles at sub $1.2k. I would need a swap kit for $1.5k, clutch for $500-1000, transmission mounts, shifter, driveshaft, clutch fork/hydraulic kit. I’m thinking I could recover 50% of the value of my Kpower kit, so in the end, probably $2k more, which isn’t a big deal, but I’ll also need to modify the trans tunnel, probably remove interior bits to drill holes for the transmission mounts, bla bla. Yeah, I’ll probably just do the second gen and then upgrade in the future if I need to upgrade for a bigger power build or track use, someday.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | DarkPira7e (12-13-2022) |
|
|
#377 |
|
Wears Pants
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 14 FRS K24 swap - SOLD
Location: Bella Vista, AR
Posts: 559
Thanks: 383
Thanked 449 Times in 274 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
|
Has anyone confirmed the actual differences between a gen 1 and 2 trans yet? I've been tempted to snatch one up if a good deal presents itself, but I didn't think it was supposed to be that drastic of a change from a beefcake standpoint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#378 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,810 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Here we have some discussion. A lot of the links are dead, so I have to assume the OP was quoting the articles accurately. I feel like I read in the past that 4th gear wasn't necessarily weak, but the synchro or something causing the gear to displace would cause it to fail. They used shot peening on the pistons of the MY17+, so using shot peening on the gears doesn't sound unreasonable. I feel like I remember early press briefs with all the specifics on the upgrades from the first gen and people were talking about the improvements to the transmission, but it is hard to find now. Dead links or searches are muddled by new articles: Quote:
Quote:
Mentions 4th gear carbon synchro. https://www.ft86club.com/forums/show....php?p=3546730
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | DarkPira7e (12-13-2022) |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| worst.build.ever. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KPower Industries K24 swap | PulsarBeeerz | Engine Swaps | 1801 | 04-15-2025 11:54 AM |
| Irace86.2.0 Build | Irace86.2.0 | Member's Car Journals | 195 | 03-25-2024 12:29 AM |
| Turbo or swap | Fastend | Forced Induction | 35 | 06-11-2020 07:12 PM |
| Built Turbo K24 Swap? | Calmwhiteguy | Engine Swaps | 31 | 02-13-2018 05:07 PM |
| IRACE86's Build | Irace86 | Member's Car Journals | 25 | 01-10-2017 04:35 PM |